PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows 2000 Deployment
Re: NT WKS to W2K rollout
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows 2000 Deployment
Re: NT WKS to W2K rollout
![]() |
Re: NT WKS to W2K rollout |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>-----Original Message----- >I agree, clean wipe is much better; I didn't do anything special with >the roaming profiles though; just logged off NT one day, and straight >into 2000 the next. > >Kevin Mattson wrote: >> I have migrated many workstations from NT to 2000. The most successful >> and consistent method I have seen is to perform a wipe a load instead >> of an upgrade. I like to use imaging software to perform this. Also >> if you have roaming user profiles you will want to create new profiles. >> You can use the User State Migration Tool to capture settings from the >> old profile or at the least copy the favorites. >> >> Kevin Mattson >> www.deploy-tech.net >> >> >> TrxyM5 wrote: >> >>>Have any of you done a successful company-wide upgrade >>>from Windows NT Workstation to Windows 2000 Professional? >>>We have about 50 boxes left and are in disagreement as to >>>the best way to go about it. Any advice would help! >> >> >> > > >-- >Gerry Hickman (London UK) > >. I would agree. I migrated over 300 computers from WIN98/WINNT to WIN2000 and did a wipe and load on each and everyone of them. Takes a bit longer but you know the saying: better to spend a little time/money upfront than to spend a whole lotta time/money afterwards... There would be far few problems with the wipe and load method. Plus, for the WINNT clients you would not have the same directory structure. Meaning, you will not have "Documents and Settings" with each user profile located in there. It would stay the "NT" way - having each user profile located in the the Profiles folder which is located inside the WINNT folder...IIRC. HTH, Cary |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Cary Shultz wrote:
> There would be far few problems with the wipe and load > method. Plus, for the WINNT clients you would not have > the same directory structure. Exactly; I ran into this exact problem today. A user reported an obscure problem that didn't make any sense in my "clean" build; when I got to her machine I realized she was on an "upgrade" (I'd forgotten to zap and re-build), so I wasted time sorting it out, whereas it would never have happened on a clean box. -- Gerry Hickman (London UK) |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

