PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Security
is a linux server safer than windows?
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows XP
Windows XP Security
is a linux server safer than windows?
![]() |
is a linux server safer than windows? |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is more
secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? I was hoping someone could put some light on this situation. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All OSes and software have vulnerabilities. What makes Windows ~seem~ less
safe than Windows is that there are more people trying to find the security holes. If you're a malicious person wanting to write a virus or plan an attack, it wouldn't make sense to pick an OS that only 2% of the world uses. That is why you hear or Windows attacks more often than other OSes. Ray at home "Aaron Lewis" <tadafumi@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:xMisb.372391$6C4.313126@pd7tw1no... > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is more > secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? I was > hoping someone could put some light on this situation. > > |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
linux is far more robust and secure than windows
thats a fact "Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <myfirstname at lane 34 . komm> wrote in message news:%235Hs8ROqDHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > All OSes and software have vulnerabilities. What makes Windows ~seem~ less > safe than Windows is that there are more people trying to find the security > holes. If you're a malicious person wanting to write a virus or plan an > attack, it wouldn't make sense to pick an OS that only 2% of the world uses. > That is why you hear or Windows attacks more often than other OSes. > > Ray at home > > "Aaron Lewis" <tadafumi@shaw.ca> wrote in message > news:xMisb.372391$6C4.313126@pd7tw1no... > > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is more > > secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? I > was > > hoping someone could put some light on this situation. > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph...w.microsoft.com
see for yourself lol "ceedee" <dontbother@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:O1iovdRqDHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > linux is far more robust and secure than windows > thats a fact > > > "Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <myfirstname at lane 34 . komm> wrote in message > news:%235Hs8ROqDHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > All OSes and software have vulnerabilities. What makes Windows ~seem~ > less > > safe than Windows is that there are more people trying to find the > security > > holes. If you're a malicious person wanting to write a virus or plan an > > attack, it wouldn't make sense to pick an OS that only 2% of the world > uses. > > That is why you hear or Windows attacks more often than other OSes. > > > > Ray at home > > > > "Aaron Lewis" <tadafumi@shaw.ca> wrote in message > > news:xMisb.372391$6C4.313126@pd7tw1no... > > > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is more > > > secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? I > > was > > > hoping someone could put some light on this situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please provide some sources to back up this claim.
-- Regards, Mike -- Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these newsgroups "ceedee" <dontbother@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:O1iovdRqDHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > linux is far more robust and secure than windows > thats a fact > > > "Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <myfirstname at lane 34 . komm> wrote in message > news:%235Hs8ROqDHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > All OSes and software have vulnerabilities. What makes Windows ~seem~ > less > > safe than Windows is that there are more people trying to find the > security > > holes. If you're a malicious person wanting to write a virus or plan an > > attack, it wouldn't make sense to pick an OS that only 2% of the world > uses. > > That is why you hear or Windows attacks more often than other OSes. > > > > Ray at home > > > > "Aaron Lewis" <tadafumi@shaw.ca> wrote in message > > news:xMisb.372391$6C4.313126@pd7tw1no... > > > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is more > > > secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? I > > was > > > hoping someone could put some light on this situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The link you posted shows Microsoft IIS 6.0 running on "Linux" - which it
obviously does not not. The netcraft site is incorrectly identifying the fact that there are other systems used by our hosting partners that route and load balance etc etc prior to you actually reaching the Windows Server IIS web servers that actually host the microsoft.com external web site. For a better understanding of this - look at the link on the page you posted the link to. It is right at the top and has the title Microsoft Running Linux?! this links to http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2...o_a_point_.html It is always advisable to understand the full story and meaning of the data you are quoting when used as evidence to back up a claim. -- Regards, Mike -- Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these newsgroups "ceedee" <dontbother@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:O6nyXjRqDHA.2588@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph...w.microsoft.com > > see for yourself lol > > > > > "ceedee" <dontbother@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:O1iovdRqDHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > linux is far more robust and secure than windows > > thats a fact > > > > > > "Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <myfirstname at lane 34 . komm> wrote in message > > news:%235Hs8ROqDHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > All OSes and software have vulnerabilities. What makes Windows ~seem~ > > less > > > safe than Windows is that there are more people trying to find the > > security > > > holes. If you're a malicious person wanting to write a virus or plan an > > > attack, it wouldn't make sense to pick an OS that only 2% of the world > > uses. > > > That is why you hear or Windows attacks more often than other OSes. > > > > > > Ray at home > > > > > > "Aaron Lewis" <tadafumi@shaw.ca> wrote in message > > > news:xMisb.372391$6C4.313126@pd7tw1no... > > > > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is > more > > > > secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? > I > > > was > > > > hoping someone could put some light on this situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yeah yeah yeah
the link was just a laff or didnt you see the lol bit check this longest uptimes http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html BSD and nix got MS over a barrel "Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mikebran@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:eoswzASqDHA.3612@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > The link you posted shows Microsoft IIS 6.0 running on "Linux" - which it > obviously does not not. > The netcraft site is incorrectly identifying the fact that there are other > systems used by our hosting partners that route and load balance etc etc > prior to you actually reaching the Windows Server IIS web servers that > actually host the microsoft.com external web site. > > For a better understanding of this - look at the link on the page you posted > the link to. > It is right at the top and has the title Microsoft Running Linux?! this > links to > http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2...o_a_point_.html > > It is always advisable to understand the full story and meaning of the data > you are quoting when used as evidence to back up a claim. > -- > Regards, > > Mike > -- > Mike Brannigan [Microsoft] > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights > > Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these > newsgroups > > "ceedee" <dontbother@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:O6nyXjRqDHA.2588@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph...w.microsoft.com > > > > see for yourself lol > > > > > > > > > > "ceedee" <dontbother@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:O1iovdRqDHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > > linux is far more robust and secure than windows > > > thats a fact > > > > > > > > > "Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <myfirstname at lane 34 . komm> wrote in message > > > news:%235Hs8ROqDHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > > > All OSes and software have vulnerabilities. What makes Windows ~seem~ > > > less > > > > safe than Windows is that there are more people trying to find the > > > security > > > > holes. If you're a malicious person wanting to write a virus or plan > an > > > > attack, it wouldn't make sense to pick an OS that only 2% of the world > > > uses. > > > > That is why you hear or Windows attacks more often than other OSes. > > > > > > > > Ray at home > > > > > > > > "Aaron Lewis" <tadafumi@shaw.ca> wrote in message > > > > news:xMisb.372391$6C4.313126@pd7tw1no... > > > > > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is > > more > > > > > secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is it? > > I > > > > was > > > > > hoping someone could put some light on this situation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Much depends on the skill of the administrator, in either case. You can
build a crappy Linux box just as easily as a crappy Windows box.... Aaron Lewis wrote: > Lately I've heard a lot of people telling me that a Linux server is > more secure than a Windows server. I don't know what to believe. Is > it? I was hoping someone could put some light on this situation. |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

