PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows 2000 Printing
Local print queues for remote printers
Forums
Newsgroups
Windows 2000
Microsoft Windows 2000 Printing
Local print queues for remote printers
![]() |
Local print queues for remote printers |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have a number of dial-in computers (WinXP) with a
printer attached to the back of each. I need two-way communication to those remote printers, ie. People from home base can print to them, and well as the remote users being able to print for themselves. I have attempted to set things up in the following manner. I have set up shares for the printers on all the remote computers, then I set up those computers/printers on my print server (W2K), effectively creating a share of a share. The idea behind this is so that my print server acts as a queue for the remote printers. So far, I have been able to get the print jobs from other clients to go to the print server and stay in the queue until the remote computer comes on-line - the problem arises when the print server tries to pump those jobs through to the remote computer/printer, and the print queue on the print server always comes up with following error: "Error printing." I can ping the remote computers and see the remote printers, so Computer Name/IP resolution doesn't appear to be the problem. I'm trying to achieve it this way because one of my applications won't release itself back to the user while it's spooling a print job to a printer - over a remote connection this could take some time. Another problem with this application is that one module "hunts" for the printers before it will let the user continue - if a printer is offline, it won't let the user continue at all. I figured if I can get the application to dump the print job into the print server queue and let the print server worry about getting the job to the remote computer, at least the user can continue working. Any ideas why the print jobs won't reach their destinations, or is there a better solution? |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

