TreeView with adjustable TreeNode height

Hi,

Does anyone know a third party TreeView control with the possibility to
adjust (programmatically) independently the heights of the TreeNodes? i.e.
sort of multiline TreeNode.

(Or would it be feasible to construct such one by yourself inheriting from
the .NET TreeNode class?)


Ron

The UltraTree from Infragistics has an 'ItemHeight' property on its
Override object so it can be specified for all nodes, a specific level of
nodes, all the children of a particular node or for a specific node. It also
has a bunch of features not present in the inbox tree control.

http://www.infragistics.com/product...ltrawintree.asp

"Ron Bullman" <ron.bullman@mail.com> wrote in message
news:uFQQgUISDHA.2228@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know a third party TreeView control with the possibility to
> adjust (programmatically) independently the heights of the TreeNodes? i.e.
> sort of multiline TreeNode.
>
> (Or would it be feasible to construct such one by yourself inheriting from
> the .NET TreeNode class?)
>
>
> Ron
>
>

Thanks Andrew,

I'll check the UltraTree more detailed.

Ron
"Andrew (Infragistics)" <productmanager@infragistics.com> wrote in message
news:uZNFZ0JSDHA.3132@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> The UltraTree from Infragistics has an 'ItemHeight' property on its
> Override object so it can be specified for all nodes, a specific level of
> nodes, all the children of a particular node or for a specific node. It
also
> has a bunch of features not present in the inbox tree control.
>
> http://www.infragistics.com/product...ltrawintree.asp
>
> "Ron Bullman" <ron.bullman@mail.com> wrote in message
> news:uFQQgUISDHA.2228@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know a third party TreeView control with the possibility to
> > adjust (programmatically) independently the heights of the TreeNodes?
i.e.
> > sort of multiline TreeNode.
> >
> > (Or would it be feasible to construct such one by yourself inheriting
from
> > the .NET TreeNode class?)
> >
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
>
>

Did anybody resolved this issue?