PC Review
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Word
Microsoft Frontpage
hidden text
Forums
Newsgroups
Microsoft Word
Microsoft Frontpage
hidden text
![]() |
hidden text |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in detail what
the web page is for search engines but i've just read that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is this right? I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the figures in the tables. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That is right.
-- === Tom "Pepper" Willett Microsoft MVP - FrontPage --- About FrontPage 2003: http://office.microsoft.com/home/of...etid=FX01085802 FrontPage 2003 Product Information: http://www.microsoft.com/office/fro...fo/default.mspx Understanding FrontPage: http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/un...ding/frontpage/ === "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in detail what | the web page is for search engines but i've just read that hidden text on | pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is this right? | | I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures and so | the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the figures in the | tables. | | |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a penalty on some search engines.
"guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in detail what | the web page is for search engines but i've just read that hidden text on | pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is this right? | | I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures and so | the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the figures in the | tables. | | |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden?
"Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a penalty on some search engines. "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in detail what | the web page is for search engines but i've just read that hidden text on | pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is this right? | | I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures and so | the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the figures in the | tables. | | |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
IMHO, you'd be better off using the meta name="description" and meta
name="keywords" tags. -- ~ Kathleen Anderson Microsoft FrontPage MVP Spider Web Woman Designs http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/resources/ guy <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote: > What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden? > > "Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" > <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message > news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a > penalty on some search engines. > > > "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in >> detail what the web page is for search engines but i've just read >> that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is >> this right? >> >> I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures >> and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the >> figures in the tables. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Kathleen:
If only the SE's paid attention to them anymore.... 8( There's just not going to be any substitute for a well and carefully constructed page in this case, I'm afraid. -- Murray "Kathleen Anderson [MVP - FrontPage]" <spiderwebwoman@mvps.org> wrote in message news:%23OGt0rdtEHA.904@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > IMHO, you'd be better off using the meta name="description" and meta > name="keywords" tags. > > > -- > > ~ Kathleen Anderson > Microsoft FrontPage MVP > Spider Web Woman Designs > http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/resources/ > > > > guy <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote: >> What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden? >> >> "Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" >> <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message >> news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a >> penalty on some search engines. >> >> >> "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >>> I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in >>> detail what the web page is for search engines but i've just read >>> that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is >>> this right? >>> >>> I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures >>> and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the >>> figures in the tables. > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
in your opinion, how "bad" is it to do this? I also put some hidden text
(in a div marked display: none strictly to make the google adsenseadvertisements more relevant. but I don't want to "shoot myself in the foot" with it. -- Chris Leeds, Microsoft MVP-FrontPage Make More Money with Less Work Let Your Clients Control Their Content With Just A Browser! http://contentseed.com/ -- "Kathleen Anderson [MVP - FrontPage]" <spiderwebwoman@mvps.org> wrote in message news:#OGt0rdtEHA.904@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > IMHO, you'd be better off using the meta name="description" and meta > name="keywords" tags. > > > -- > > ~ Kathleen Anderson > Microsoft FrontPage MVP > Spider Web Woman Designs > http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/resources/ > > > > guy <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote: > > What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden? > > > > "Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" > > <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message > > news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > > page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a > > penalty on some search engines. > > > > > > "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >> I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in > >> detail what the web page is for search engines but i've just read > >> that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is > >> this right? > >> > >> I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures > >> and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the > >> figures in the tables. > |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
At one point in time, search engines were penalizing for hidden text or text
the same color as the page background. It could be they no longer even recognize it. -- === Tom "Pepper" Willett Microsoft MVP - FrontPage --- About FrontPage 2003: http://office.microsoft.com/home/of...etid=FX01085802 FrontPage 2003 Product Information: http://www.microsoft.com/office/fro...fo/default.mspx Understanding FrontPage: http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/un...ding/frontpage/ FrontPage 2002 Server Extensions Support Center: http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...fh;en-us;fp10se === "Chris Leeds, MVP-FrontPage" <Leeds@mvps.org> wrote in message news:OI1s4detEHA.1328@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... | in your opinion, how "bad" is it to do this? I also put some hidden text | (in a div marked display: none strictly to make the google adsense| advertisements more relevant. | | but I don't want to "shoot myself in the foot" with it. | | -- | Chris Leeds, | Microsoft MVP-FrontPage | | Make More Money with Less Work | Let Your Clients Control Their Content With Just A Browser! | http://contentseed.com/ | -- | "Kathleen Anderson [MVP - FrontPage]" <spiderwebwoman@mvps.org> wrote in | message news:#OGt0rdtEHA.904@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... | > IMHO, you'd be better off using the meta name="description" and meta | > name="keywords" tags. | > | > | > -- | > | > ~ Kathleen Anderson | > Microsoft FrontPage MVP | > Spider Web Woman Designs | > http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/resources/ | > | > | > | > guy <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote: | > > What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden? | > > | > > "Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" | > > <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message | > > news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | > > page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a | > > penalty on some search engines. | > > | > > | > > "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message | > > news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... | > >> I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in | > >> detail what the web page is for search engines but i've just read | > >> that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is | > >> this right? | > >> | > >> I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures | > >> and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the | > >> figures in the tables. | > | | |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think it's generally a bad approach. If I were an aggressive competitor
struggling with you for a higher ranking, and I looked at your code and saw that, I'd report you to the SE. -- Murray "Chris Leeds, MVP-FrontPage" <Leeds@mvps.org> wrote in message news:OI1s4detEHA.1328@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > in your opinion, how "bad" is it to do this? I also put some hidden text > (in a div marked display: none strictly to make the google adsense> advertisements more relevant. > > but I don't want to "shoot myself in the foot" with it. > > -- > Chris Leeds, > Microsoft MVP-FrontPage > > Make More Money with Less Work > Let Your Clients Control Their Content With Just A Browser! > http://contentseed.com/ > -- > "Kathleen Anderson [MVP - FrontPage]" <spiderwebwoman@mvps.org> wrote in > message news:#OGt0rdtEHA.904@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >> IMHO, you'd be better off using the meta name="description" and meta >> name="keywords" tags. >> >> >> -- >> >> ~ Kathleen Anderson >> Microsoft FrontPage MVP >> Spider Web Woman Designs >> http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/resources/ >> >> >> >> guy <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote: >> > What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden? >> > >> > "Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" >> > <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message >> > news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> > page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a >> > penalty on some search engines. >> > >> > >> > "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... >> >> I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in >> >> detail what the web page is for search engines but i've just read >> >> that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is >> >> this right? >> >> >> >> I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures >> >> and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the >> >> figures in the tables. >> > > |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
that's too bad, the ironic thing is that I'm not doing it to "spoof" the
search engines, but to "guide" adsense! urrgh. I guess it's back to the drawing board on that aspect. worked real good too! -- Chris Leeds, Microsoft MVP-FrontPage Make More Money with Less Work Let Your Clients Control Their Content With Just A Browser! http://contentseed.com/ -- "Murray" <forums@HAHAgreat-web-sights.com> wrote in message news:ufjklxetEHA.1464@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > I think it's generally a bad approach. If I were an aggressive competitor > struggling with you for a higher ranking, and I looked at your code and saw > that, I'd report you to the SE. > > -- > Murray > > "Chris Leeds, MVP-FrontPage" <Leeds@mvps.org> wrote in message > news:OI1s4detEHA.1328@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > in your opinion, how "bad" is it to do this? I also put some hidden text > > (in a div marked display: none strictly to make the google adsense> > advertisements more relevant. > > > > but I don't want to "shoot myself in the foot" with it. > > > > -- > > Chris Leeds, > > Microsoft MVP-FrontPage > > > > Make More Money with Less Work > > Let Your Clients Control Their Content With Just A Browser! > > http://contentseed.com/ > > -- > > "Kathleen Anderson [MVP - FrontPage]" <spiderwebwoman@mvps.org> wrote in > > message news:#OGt0rdtEHA.904@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > >> IMHO, you'd be better off using the meta name="description" and meta > >> name="keywords" tags. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> ~ Kathleen Anderson > >> Microsoft FrontPage MVP > >> Spider Web Woman Designs > >> http://www.spiderwebwoman.com/resources/ > >> > >> > >> > >> guy <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > What about making the text size (font) very small but not hidden? > >> > > >> > "Rob Giordano (aka: Crash Gordon®)" > >> > <NOVIAGRAwebmaster@siriussystems.com> wrote in message > >> > news:eoohy0WtEHA.4044@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >> > page stuffing (invisible text) for search engines may get you a > >> > penalty on some search engines. > >> > > >> > > >> > "guy" <wildfiction@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >> > news:OUY%23fqWtEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > >> >> I have some hidden text at the top of my page that describers in > >> >> detail what the web page is for search engines but i've just read > >> >> that hidden text on pages is not a good idea for search engines. Is > >> >> this right? > >> >> > >> >> I originally put it there because the pages have tables of figures > >> >> and so the brief in the search engine results didn't describe the > >> >> figures in the tables. > >> > > > > > > |
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|

Main Page 

strictly to make the google adsense
