What I meant was: If you change the system date or time of
a Win2000 installation that uses a FAT32 system partition
then your scheduled tasks are likely to fail.
Since your file system is NTFS, this does not apply. I'm
afraid I have no further suggestions.
"Ben Hinshaw" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0a6f01c3be6f$d44d9f50$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Appreciate the response. I double checked all 3 servers
> and all are using NTFS system partitions and have been
> since going into production. I'm not exactly clear what
> is meant by playing w/ the system date/time. I do call
> the XSET32 library to insert a date stamp in the file name
> of the backup01.log file, however that is done through a
> separate scheduled task and batch file which runs several
> hours after the backup has run. Could you fill me a bit
> more? Is this an issue I should open a TAC with Microsoft
> for?
> >
> >
> The problem you report is usually encountered on machines
> that use a FAT32 file system for the system drive, on the
> day when Daylight Saving Time changes (I know this sounds
> improbable but that's the way it is). Are you perhaps
> playing with the system date/time?
>
>
> "Ben Hinshaw" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
> in message
> news:1e9301c3bdd6$61470080$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I am attempting to use Task Scheduler on 3 servers
> running > 2K Server SP4. Each night at 11, the scheduler
> calls on a > batch file to run the designated backups for
> that night. I have assigned the Run as: account to the
> local administrator and password account. Everything,
> every night works fine for approx. a week to a week and a
> half before I begin getting the following error:
> > The attempt to log on to the account associated with the
> > task failed, therefore, the task did not run. The
> > specific error is: 0x80070569: Logon failure: the user
> > has not been granted the requested logon type at this
> > computer. Verify the task's Run-as name and password are
> > valid and try again. I will then re-enter the admin
> password and things work fine again for another week
> before getting the same errors again. Technet article
> 328773, refers to this similar error which was supposed to
> be fixed in SP4, however that's what I'm running and still
> getting these errors.
> >
> > Any help is greatly appreciated!
>
>
> .
>
>
|