Simon. <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):
> on Sun, 29 Jun 2003 01:41:14 +0300, "Pavel A." <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote this wisdom:
>
>>"Simon." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> I thought that IRQ 2 was the chained link between the interrupt
>>> chips which means that irq 2 and 9 are the same thing.
>>>
>>> My memory may be failing though !
>>
>>No, irq 9 is not same as irq 2. It's time to begin forgetting about
>>dos
-- PA
>>
>>
> Well I thought that the hardware was wired that way and had nothing to
> do with any particular OS.
>
> You're right though it's time to dump DOS (windows too really and go
> Linux - more reliable and PROPER multiuser environmnent !)
>
> *grin*
>
And tons of headaches and incompatabilities to boot...