"ASCII" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:4aab4ef3.5019703@EBCDIC...
> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>"ASCII" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:4aa94947.3567953@EBCDIC...
>>> 1PW wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Personally I recommend MBAM & SAS as a pair when attempting to resolve
>>>>many malware issues.
>>>
>>> Just an intuition, not proven, but MBAM seems to enjoy a reputation of
>>> having a slight edge on SAS, and if so, why wouldn't either be as good
>>> as the other, yet without the redundance?
>>
>>I believe that the difference in method between these two is enough to
>>offset any redundancy concerns.
>
> Maybe it's the presence of RaiD in this forum that positively skews the
> impressions of his product, in spite of the petty hosts file wars of
> late, but I gather MBAM has incorporated most if not all the heuristic
> advantage SAS might once have enjoyed into their current version?
>
>>I too would recommend SAS to users that want that sort of thing.
>
> Want what sort of thing, the confusing bloat of redundance,
> or to be polite, a second opinion in a world of 0-day sploits?

You were born an idiot, and you will die an idiot!

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:36:00 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>"ASCII" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:4aab4ef3.5019703@EBCDIC...
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>"ASCII" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>news:4aa94947.3567953@EBCDIC...
>>>> 1PW wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Personally I recommend MBAM & SAS as a pair when attempting to resolve
>>>>>many malware issues.
>>>>
>>>> Just an intuition, not proven, but MBAM seems to enjoy a reputation of
>>>> having a slight edge on SAS, and if so, why wouldn't either be as good
>>>> as the other, yet without the redundance?
>>>
>>>I believe that the difference in method between these two is enough to
>>>offset any redundancy concerns.
>>
>> Maybe it's the presence of RaiD in this forum that positively skews the
>> impressions of his product, in spite of the petty hosts file wars of
>> late, but I gather MBAM has incorporated most if not all the heuristic
>> advantage SAS might once have enjoyed into their current version?
>>
>>>I too would recommend SAS to users that want that sort of thing.
>>
I couldn't get MBAM to work without bombing on my past Win XP machine.
I got another new machine last week and MBAM bombs on that, too.
Again, I had to remove it, despite the fact I had the paid-for
version.

Paid-for SAS hasn't given me any problems on the old machine nor on
the new one.

(E-Mail Removed)o wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:36:00 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> "ASCII" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:4aab4ef3.5019703@EBCDIC...
>>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> "ASCII" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>> news:4aa94947.3567953@EBCDIC...
>>>>> 1PW wrote:
>>>>>> Personally I recommend MBAM & SAS as a pair when attempting to resolve
>>>>>> many malware issues.
>>>>> Just an intuition, not proven, but MBAM seems to enjoy a reputation of
>>>>> having a slight edge on SAS, and if so, why wouldn't either be as good
>>>>> as the other, yet without the redundance?
>>>> I believe that the difference in method between these two is enough to
>>>> offset any redundancy concerns.
>>> Maybe it's the presence of RaiD in this forum that positively skews the
>>> impressions of his product, in spite of the petty hosts file wars of
>>> late, but I gather MBAM has incorporated most if not all the heuristic
>>> advantage SAS might once have enjoyed into their current version?
>>>
>>>> I too would recommend SAS to users that want that sort of thing.
> I couldn't get MBAM to work without bombing on my past Win XP machine.
> I got another new machine last week and MBAM bombs on that, too.
> Again, I had to remove it, despite the fact I had the paid-for
> version.

Please let us help you. What were the symptoms you saw?

> Paid-for SAS hasn't given me any problems on the old machine nor on
> the new one.


--
1PW

George Orwell wrote:
>
>You were born an idiot, and you will die an idiot!

Did the fortune teller reveal anything else about you?