In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Thomas R. Kettler <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> In article <TOKdneOHo5TKlsTRnZ2dnUVZ_h-(E-Mail Removed)>,
[...]
>> > However this guy is also damaging the USB ports, not only the USB
>> > sticks. And they are typically far more expensive to replace.
>>
>> Good point. I will tell him that.
> I thought the same thing but did not know how much stress a USB port can
> handle. Does anyone have the specs?
The spec do specify materials, plating and the like, but
not maximum ratings. The plastic contact carrier inside
a standard USB connector is 1.84mm x 11.1mm "Thermoplastic
Insulator UL94-V0", which can be different materials and
does not require any glass-fiber strengthening. Also note
that this thing does not even need to break. A hairline-fracture
in a contact trace is quite enough. Standard wisdom would say
to not put more mechanical load on the connector than its
extraction force, which for USB is 10N (~1kG). Divide that
by the lever-type torque amplification represented by the
USB key.
Some quick measurements with my keys show an insertion depth
of 8mm and a key length of total 28mm to 64mm (there are
longer ones), this gives torque-amplification factors
of 2.5x ... 7x. So with a medium length USB key, a mechanical
load of 200g at its end would already be right at the maximum
for safe operation.
Surprisingly, a standard USB receptacle is only rated at 1500
insertion cycles, wereas a mini-USB has 5000 and micro-USB has
10000.
Arno
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email:
(E-Mail Removed)
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans