"dos" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:bngrh1$ais$(E-Mail Removed)...

> You might find http://www.av-test.org/ and interesting read.

Interesting horseshit! av-test.org is a JOKE!

"Anonymous Sender" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "dos" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bngrh1$ais$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > You might find http://www.av-test.org/ and interesting read.
>
> Interesting horseshit! av-test.org is a JOKE!
>

Let see what testing you can do then, and are you that scared of what people
think about your own opinions you hide behind and anonymouse account?

"dos" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bnli2r$jgu$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Anonymous Sender" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "dos" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bngrh1$ais$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > > You might find http://www.av-test.org/ and interesting read.
> >
> > Interesting horseshit! av-test.org is a JOKE!
> >
>
> Let see what testing you can do then, and are you that scared of what
people
> think about your own opinions you hide behind and anonymouse account?
>
>
I don't know what anonymous' point is, but the data posted there is quite
out of date, not only in terms of testing dates. The versions of the
products that were benchmarked are out of date, as well.
The whole point of benchmarking is that it is a dynamic process and looking
at old benchmark data isn't particularly useful. By the time they post their
next results, the data will be six months old already.