PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Re: Seeking Opinions On This Build...

 
 
Red Cloud
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jul 2012
On Jul 29, 3:31*pm, Agent_C <agent-c-hates-s...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> CPU - Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz - BX80623I72600K $289
>
> Motherboard - ASUS P8Q67-M DO/CSM (REV 3.0) LGA 1155 *$129
>
> Memory - Kingston 8GB 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 KVR16N11/8 *$43
>
> Case - Antec Sonata III 500 Black ATX Mid Tower 500W Power Supply $129
>
> SSD - Intel 520 Cherryville SSDSC2CW120A3K5 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC
> $144
>
> HD - Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s
> 3.5 $109
>
> Blu-Ray - LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM
> 4MB $69
>
> Card Reader - nMEDIAPC ZE-C198 All-in-one USB 3.0/IEEE 1394/e-SATA $27
>
> CPU Cooler - ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 7 Pro Rev.2 92mm *$30
>
> OS - Microsoft Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit $139
>
> Much oblidged!
>
> A_C



What advantages do you have for overspending on hardware stuff?




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
John Doe
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jul 2012
A freak racist troll...

Red Cloud <mmdir2005 yahoo.com> wrote:
see also Google Groups
> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000pbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Red Cloud <mmdir2005 yahoo.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
> Subject: Re: Seeking Opinions On This Build...
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 23:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 34
> Message-ID: <3be3b9ec-84e9-40c5-aa23-1d8510006bc5 a7g2000pbm.googlegroups.com>
> References: <haeb18lflvm1p8f1cecvqc0sjqn1fe99dl 4ax.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.119.234.20
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1343630591 20819 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2012 06:43:11 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:43:11 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
> Injection-Info: a7g2000pbm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=98.119.234.20; posting-account=J56LSgkAAADXgXF-d8W7le6CF3ZN1DW1
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0,gzip(gfe)
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:23729
>
> On Jul 29, 3:31’pm, Agent_C <agent-c-hates-s... nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>> CPU - Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz - BX80623I72600K $289
>>
>> Motherboard - ASUS P8Q67-M DO/CSM (REV 3.0) LGA 1155 ’$129
>>
>> Memory - Kingston 8GB 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 KVR16N11/8 ’$43
>>
>> Case - Antec Sonata III 500 Black ATX Mid Tower 500W Power Supply $129
>>
>> SSD - Intel 520 Cherryville SSDSC2CW120A3K5 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC
>> $144
>>
>> HD - Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s
>> 3.5 $109
>>
>> Blu-Ray - LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM
>> 4MB $69
>>
>> Card Reader - nMEDIAPC ZE-C198 All-in-one USB 3.0/IEEE 1394/e-SATA $27
>>
>> CPU Cooler - ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 7 Pro Rev.2 92mm ’$30
>>
>> OS - Microsoft Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit $139
>>
>> Much oblidged!
>>
>> A_C

>
>
> What advantages do you have for overspending on hardware stuff?
>
>
>
>
>
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jul 2012
Red Cloud wrote:
> On Jul 29, 3:31 pm, Agent_C <agent-c-hates-s...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>> CPU - Intel Core i7-2600K Sandy Bridge 3.4GHz - BX80623I72600K $289
>>
>> Motherboard - ASUS P8Q67-M DO/CSM (REV 3.0) LGA 1155 $129
>>
>> Memory - Kingston 8GB 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 KVR16N11/8 $43
>>
>> Case - Antec Sonata III 500 Black ATX Mid Tower 500W Power Supply $129
>>
>> SSD - Intel 520 Cherryville SSDSC2CW120A3K5 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC
>> $144
>>
>> HD - Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s
>> 3.5 $109
>>
>> Blu-Ray - LG Black 14X BD-R 2X BD-RE 16X DVD+R 5X DVD-RAM 12X BD-ROM
>> 4MB $69
>>
>> Card Reader - nMEDIAPC ZE-C198 All-in-one USB 3.0/IEEE 1394/e-SATA $27
>>
>> CPU Cooler - ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 7 Pro Rev.2 92mm $30
>>
>> OS - Microsoft Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit $139
>>
>> Much oblidged!
>>
>> A_C

>
>
> What advantages do you have for overspending on hardware stuff?


I think it would be better, to state the question diplomatically,
such as what the intention of the build is. Once you know the
intention of the build, then it's easier to make suggestions.

It looks like a premium business user setup of some sort. With provisions
to support the computer via an IT department, at night.

Issues:

1) P8Q67-M DO/CSM.

Very few reviews of the motherboard are available. Three reviews on
Newegg. Zero comments or questions in the vip.asus.com forum dedicated
to that particular motherboard model. A problem with unpopular motherboard
models, is getting support for them. The motherboard maker might not
do more than five BIOS updates on the web site, if the model is not
popular and nobody bought it. More BIOS updates are done, on popular
models. And user interest, helps provide solutions to problems, like
where to find the right driver etc.

Board has no downloadable user manual. You may need to download the
P8Q67-M DO manual and pretend it's a manual for the P8Q67-M DO/CSM.
I particularly don't like this. I won't buy a motherboard, unless I
can look at the (proper) manual first. If Asus had a pre-sales contact,
I'd ask for this.

Motherboard has Q67 chipset, which gives the possibility of AMT support
(for IT department to wake the computer or even reset it remotely when
the computer has crashed). This may also be a reason it's got an Intel NIC.
The BIOS file on such a motherboard, consists of the BIOS portion for
the CPU, plus a separate portion for the processor inside the chipset.
And then the question would be, how well does the included version of
AMT work, or is there some way to update it. AMT doesn't have much
purpose, if there isn't an IT department using/needing it. In which case,
more non-AMT motherboard models can be candidates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_A...ent_Technology

Motherboard has a TPM chip, good for BitLocker. With the caveats
that come with it. Surprisingly, TPM solutions aren't bulletproof
(if you're looking for guarantees). It's certainly true, that it's
hard to find a motherboard with a built-in TPM. Some have a header for
it, and then you can't find a convenient retail source of the TPM module.
Having the TPM chip right on the motherboard (or, part of the chipset),
means not having to deal with the details of finding one.

2) I7-2600K. While the motherboard has support for Turbo enable or disable,
the motherboard doesn't appear to be able to set the multiplier. If you
can't set the multiplier, there might not be a good reason to own a
2600K. Either change the motherboard to one that supports the "K" portion
properly. Or, change the processor. Note that, if you buy 2600K, you may
lose features like VT-d (IOMMU). It's one reason to *carefully* check the
ark.intel.com site for a processor, to make sure you're getting what you
want. Intel does some pretty silly things, in the name of market
differentiation. In some review I was reading, a user was complaining the
option was missing in a BIOS screen, and I suspect he may have had a 2600K
and Intel disabled it.

http://ark.intel.com/products/52214/...up-to-3_80-GHz)

3) Case comes with EarthWatts 500w power supply. Check the Newegg page for
the EarthWatts 500W supply before buying. One reviewer comments that if
his "cheap" UPS switches over to battery, the EarthWatts switches itself
off. This could possibly be due to active PFC on the power supply. At the
very least, if using a UPS, be prepared to have to buy a new one with
"close to sine wave" output. With the trend to the power supply makers
delivering PFC supplies to North America, this is getting harder to avoid.
Not all PFC supplies are a problem, but generally the active PFC method,
of making the current waveform look like the voltage waveform, is a problem.
If the UPS makes something that looks more like a square wave, when the UPS
is on battery, the active PFC power supply tries its best to modify the current
flow waveform. Which may lead to a little extra stress and strain.

Sometimes, buying a case without power supply is the answer. I think the
Sonata III I bought, might have been "sans PSU". Because I won't buy a case
that comes with a supply. I shop for supplies separately. The last (spare)
supply I bought, was an (inefficient) Sparkle, without PFC. Because I know
my UPS supply is crap (non-sine output).

4) nMEDIAPC ZE-C198

This device uses a mixture of internal and external connectors. You might not
get as much value from this purchase as you think. The motherboard selection,
has no USB3, so there's nothing to drive the USB3 ports as such, and the wiring
on the ZE-C198 is not intended to plug into a USB3 pin header. A simpler card
reader, without "thru connectors", might make more sense, and result in less
dangling (unused) wires inside the case.

5) Freezer 7

If selecting an aftermarket cooler, I'd try to get one that "blows downwards"
onto the motherboard. That's good if the VCore regulator gets a little warm
in normal operation. Or, you want to cool the chipset. Or the RAM is sandwiched
so close together, a little assistance in cooling is needed.

The computer case is big enough for a regular ATX motherboard, so using
a microATX for the motherboard isn't absolutely necessary with the case choice.
But the case might also be wide enough, you won't have to worry too much about
the vertical height of the CPU cooler.

If the purchase is prefaced on AMT support, I can see the choices made
ending up the way they are.

HTH,
Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Jul 2012
Agent_C wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 05:05:02 -0400, Paul <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>


>> It looks like a premium business user setup of some sort. With provisions
>> to support the computer via an IT department, at night.

>
> Precisely... It's for a financial application that requires a lot of
> CPU horsepower, but noting special in the video department.
>
>> Issues:
>>
>> 1) P8Q67-M DO/CSM.
>>
>> Very few reviews of the motherboard are available. Three reviews on
>> Newegg. Zero comments or questions in the vip.asus.com forum dedicated
>> to that particular motherboard model. A problem with unpopular motherboard
>> models, is getting support for them. The motherboard maker might not
>> do more than five BIOS updates on the web site, if the model is not
>> popular and nobody bought it. More BIOS updates are done, on popular
>> models. And user interest, helps provide solutions to problems, like
>> where to find the right driver etc.
>>
>> Board has no downloadable user manual. You may need to download the
>> P8Q67-M DO manual and pretend it's a manual for the P8Q67-M DO/CSM.
>> I particularly don't like this. I won't buy a motherboard, unless I
>> can look at the (proper) manual first. If Asus had a pre-sales contact,
>> I'd ask for this.
>>
>> Motherboard has Q67 chipset, which gives the possibility of AMT support
>> (for IT department to wake the computer or even reset it remotely when
>> the computer has crashed). This may also be a reason it's got an Intel NIC.
>> The BIOS file on such a motherboard, consists of the BIOS portion for
>> the CPU, plus a separate portion for the processor inside the chipset.
>> And then the question would be, how well does the included version of
>> AMT work, or is there some way to update it. AMT doesn't have much
>> purpose, if there isn't an IT department using/needing it. In which case,
>> more non-AMT motherboard models can be candidates.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_A...ent_Technology
>>
>> Motherboard has a TPM chip, good for BitLocker. With the caveats
>> that come with it. Surprisingly, TPM solutions aren't bulletproof
>> (if you're looking for guarantees). It's certainly true, that it's
>> hard to find a motherboard with a built-in TPM. Some have a header for
>> it, and then you can't find a convenient retail source of the TPM module.
>> Having the TPM chip right on the motherboard (or, part of the chipset),
>> means not having to deal with the details of finding one.

>
> Interesting. Would you have an alternate recommendation?


You mean, to getting a Q-series chipset motherboard, or to getting TPM ?

I think I saw at least one more Q-series, in the Newegg listing.

Finding TPM could be harder. I've never really gone looking for it specifically
(like, for my own motherboard). It would be popular on government/civil service
equipment, where TPM would be more common. What's strange about TPM, is the
lack of modules for the pin-header version. If the government needs to buy them,
you'd think they'd "trickle out" into retail. Home users wouldn't particularly
want TPM, which is why retail motherboards used the pin-header approach, so
that people wishing to remove the TPM module, could unplug it. When a motherboard
has TPM soldered to the motherboard, then that product is aimed at business
or government (where there may be a mandate for TPM based encryption for storage).

The problem with TPM, is it can be used for good or for evil. Which leaves
users confused about whether it should be on the motherboard or not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module

"However even where a TPM is used, a key is still vulnerable while a software
application that has obtained it from the TPM is using it to perform
encryption/decryption operations, as has been illustrated in the case
of a cold boot attack."

This is an example of the pin-header TPM module I've never found at retail.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...4/TPM_Asus.jpg

More motherboards have the 2x10 header, than have a TPM soldered to the
motherboard. A lot of business laptops, would have TPM soldered onto
their motherboards.

And some business laptops, use full disk encryption hard drives (FDE),
where the cryptoprocessor is inside the hard drive. I've also seen
a claim, that some day, all hard drives will have that cryptoprocessor
in them. The problem with the approach, is integrating the FDE with
the system. Seagate has had drives like this, floating around for a while,
but you don't see them for sale too often (because end users like me
wouldn't know what to do with them).

http://storageeffect.media.seagate.c...certification/

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
Flasherly
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Jul 2012
On Jul 30, 7:18 pm, Agent_C <agent-c-hates-s...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

> Interesting. Would you have an alternate recommendation?


When 3770K is faster than 2600K if cheaper?

https://fb.emsix.com/uploads/FBH2Asplashlike.jpg

$30 off store price of $289.99 if you LIKE Microcenter on Facebook and
fill out the form for the coupon. 3770K is currently selling at Newegg
for $339.99 & TigerDirect for $334.99.

Intel Core i7 3770K 3.5GHz LGA 1155 Processor for $259.99 at
Microcenter
 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Jul 2012
Paul wrote:
> Agent_C wrote:



>>
>> Interesting. Would you have an alternate recommendation?

>
> You mean, to getting a Q-series chipset motherboard, or to getting TPM ?
>
> I think I saw at least one more Q-series, in the Newegg listing.
>


There's a Gigabyte board with AMT. GIGABYTE GA-Q77M-D2H LGA 1155 Intel Q77 $135
No reviews at all. To verify it had TPM, I had to use the picture of the
motherboard on Newegg (details of TPM not in manual, as to who makes it).
It's the small chip next to the words "SATA Connectors: 6Gb/s".
Board also has an Intel NIC (perhaps the price to pay, for having AMT code).
Apparently (according to the Wikipedia article), TPM is illegal in
a very small number of countries, so I presume Gigabyte ships a
different SKU with the TPM missing in that case. I guess everyone
in those countries uses Truecrypt :-)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128557

ftp://download.gigabyte.ru/manual/mb...q77m-d2h_e.pdf

ftp://download.gigabyte.ru/manual/mb...intel-ui_e.pdf

(The Russian site has the best download transfer rate...)

CPU Support chart

http://www.gigabyte.com/support-down....aspx?pid=4237

I don't know if there's an equivalent of vip.asus.com, in terms of
a forum for Gigabyte motherboard users. With no reviews at all for
the board, it's hard to say how well it works.

There is an Asrock motherboard as well, and one reviewer comment there.
And even one review in that case, is helpful.

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd Aug 2012
geoff wrote:
> Is it safe to say that benchmarking software used by tom's hardware, and
> other sites, is written for multi-core CPUs and unless one is playing
> games or doing serious video editing, a core i3 (dual core) running at
> 3.3 ghz would be plenty of power?
>


I don't do serious video editing, but I do play (older) games, and
have a dual core. So that's good enough for non-demanding usage
(like web surfing).

On occasion, some of your software uses GPU acceleration, and
you can get that too with a not-too-old video card. So if all you
had was some crusty old FX5200 cards from a decade ago, get something
a little more recent. Even a $50 card gives you "buzzword compliance",
and may help with Adobe Flash acceleration a bit. So it's not totally
CPU - sometimes a little GPU can help, and a newer card has the
hardware support that newer software might use.

Paul

 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd Aug 2012
geoff wrote:
> Looking at the price/performance charts at:
> http://www.passmark.com/
>
> These three parts seem to have the best value:
> CPU:
> http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?...20+%40+3.30GHz
> SSD: http://www.harddrivebenchmark.net/hd...dd=OCZ-VERTEX3
> Video: http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gp...Radeon+HD+6850
>
> At NewEgg, they are:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115077
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227706
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102908
>
> What MB would you get, and what would you change above?


First I get the socket info, by looking up the processor on ark.intel.com

http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/...Cache-3_30-GHz)

That one is LGA1155.

Then, I look for the "most popular" motherboard on newegg, for
the socket, and try to figure out why it is popular.

Some of the chipsets are listed here, but they don't have a
table entry for B75. Notice that some of the columns, show
chipsets with native USB3 interfaces.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4830/i...ecture-exposed

You can also do a search on support.asus.com, for the processor, and
see how many motherboards can handle it.

http://support.asus.com/cpu.aspx?SLanguage=en

P8Z77

This is an example. It's one of the cheaper Z77 motherboards (from Asus).
P8Z77-V LK

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131837 $140

I doubt you'll get all the value from that, and perhaps once
you find some details for the B75, it'll become clearer whether
something even cheaper is a better option.

If you look at the B75 column here, I think you're paying
for more of the things you can use. There is USB3. But on the SATA
ports, the cheap bastards only put one SATA III port. I generally
like stuff like that in pairs. So they crippled that for no good reason.

http://www.anandtech.com/print/4318

This is an example of a B75 board. And it has five SATA II and only
one SATA III. And that kinda ruins it for me. But otherwise, this
$70 board hits all the high points. It has USB3 built-in. GA-B75M-D3V
You see, if they didn't cripple the SATA III ports, then everyone
would be buying these, and they don't want that.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128540 $70

Intel, up to its usual tricks.

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Aug 2012
geoff wrote:
> Looking here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...eries_chipsets
>
> . . . two SATA III ports is the most Intel will support. So, with this
> board:
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128540
>
> . . . would one notice a performance difference if the SSD went on the
> SATA III port and a mechanical HDD on a SATA II port (rather than a SATA
> III port)?
>
> Also, if one maxed out the memory and installed Win 7/64-bit, do you
> think the system would be 'build it and go', or endless 'configuration'
> troubles?


For me, the issue is the transition to SSD drives, and how
suitable the system would be to operating two SSDs, and transferring
at full rate.

There's no problem if you want to use a hard drive on a SATA II
port and an SSD on the single SATA III port. The hardware supports
a typical usage pattern for today (single SSD).

I just hate to see motherboards designed to promote pre-mature
obsolescence. Some day, you could be using two solid state drives.

I don't see a reason why it would not be "build it and go". It's
up to the motherboard maker, to choose hardware which is
supported by Windows drivers. It would be pretty stupid to
include hardware which didn't have drivers. You're less assured
when it comes to things like running Linux, because the motherboard
makers don't test or provide for that. But at least for Windows,
there should be good support. It's why the download site for the
motherboard, will have drivers listed for Windows.

The $70 motherboard only has two DIMM slots, so "maxed" on memory
won't be an excessive amount of RAM. Normally, that might be
something like 2x4GB, but I notice that 8GB modules have shown up.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231486

I'd check the documentation before going with the 8GB sized modules.
And I do see some 8GB ones listed in the first document. The memory
support, is actually a processor function, as the memory controller
is in the processor. So support is actually determined by whether
the processor has an address bus format for larger DIMMs or not.
So far, I'm not seeing anything that predicts 2x8GB won't work.
If that's what you want. But 2x4GB should be enough and allow
plenty of fun.

ftp://download.gigabyte.ru/memory/mb...a-b75m-d3v.pdf

ftp://download.gigabyte.ru/manual/mb...b75m-d3v_e.pdf

Looking back at the processor information again, the processor
supports two channels of two DIMMs each, and lists 32GB max.
Which implies support for 8GB DDR3 modules.

http://ark.intel.com/products/53426/...Cache-3_30-GHz)

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Doe
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Aug 2012
Paul <nospam needed.com> wrote:

> I just hate to see motherboards designed to promote pre-mature
> obsolescence.


Like my system with an Intel LGA775 motherboard. I can't do a
major upgrade without dumping my perfectly good quad core Q9550
CPU.

Arg.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seeking opinions on these LCDs OSbandito DIY PC 14 1st Dec 2006 03:03 AM
Seeking opinions on business card scanners/readers/organizers Smells@fish.net Scanners 12 6th Sep 2005 05:30 AM
plain test post of "PDC's , dhcp and dns, and broadband router -- seeking opinions on best config" Lance Sherman Microsoft Windows 2000 Networking 1 27th Nov 2004 12:19 AM
PDC's , dhcp and dns, and broadband router -- seeking opinions on best config Lance Sherman Microsoft Windows 2000 Networking 1 27th Nov 2004 12:03 AM
Seeking opinions on asp2aspx (Netcoole software) - Converting asp to aspx Microsoft ASP .NET 3 30th Mar 2004 04:04 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 AM.