PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Re: Problem for creating ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk

 
 
Danno
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Jan 2009
I've been trying to find out how to implement a ram drive in Vista. It
appears that your registry entries will do so.

I want to use the ram drive as a place to save files that I will only use in
the current session, like unzipping files. Can you tell me what entries I
would use to set up, say, a 512kb ram drive. Nothing fancy, just suitable
for saving files to.


Thanks to anyone who has suggestions or answers,
Danno


--

----------
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------



"ImranHossain" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> I want to create a ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk (manually) in Windows Vista
> Ultimate 0x32 bit, for this I did the following things
>
> - Set the registry value for this device at the registry key
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
> NT\CurrentVersion\EMDMgmt\"Corresponding device Name" as
>
> -- CacheSizeInMB = 0x0000010e (270)
> -- CacheStatus = 0x00000001 (1)
> -- DeviceStatus = 0x00000002 (2)
> -- DoRetestDevice = 0x00000000 (0)
> -- HasSlowRegions = 0x00000000 (0)
> -- LastTestedTime = 0x00000000 (0)
> -- PhysicalDeviceSizeMB = 0x0000017f (383)
> -- ReadSpeedKBs = 0x3b9aca00 ( 1000000000 )
> -- RecommendedCacheSizeMB = 0x0000010e (270)
> -- USBVersion = 0x00020000 (131072)
> -- WriteSpeedKBs = 0x3b9aca00 ( 1000000000 )
>
> - Restart the "ReadyBoost" service
>
> The RAMDrive has not configured as ReadyBoost and the
> "readyboost.sfcache" has not created on the RAMDrive; If I right click
> on the RAMDrive and configure it as ReadyBoost from properties then it
> works properly; the "readyboost.sfcache" file has been created on the
> drive also and the registry value has been set as above.
>
> One more thing, The same procedure I have followed for a USB Flash
> drive and it can be configured as ReadyBoost by both way.
>
> NB: To make a ReadyBoost on RAMDisk, the RAMDisk type must be USBDrive
> Type.
>
> Could anybody please tell me how can I solve the problem?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Imran
>
>
> --
> ImranHossain
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ken Blake, MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Jan 2009
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:13:51 -0600, "Danno" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

> I've been trying to find out how to implement a ram drive in Vista.



In my view, except for a very rare very special situation, it's
invariably a very bad thing to do. It reduces the amount of RAM
available to Windows, and can adversely affect your performance--in
many cases, very seriously.


> It
> appears that your registry entries will do so.
>
> I want to use the ram drive as a place to save files that I will only use in
> the current session, like unzipping files.



There's no need to do that. If you are concerned about keeping those
temporary files, just create a folder on the hard drive to save them
in; then write a batch file to delete the contents of that folder, and
put a shortcut to that batch file in your Startup folder.

The above will accomplish the same thing without hurting your
performance.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Reply With Quote
 
Danno
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Jan 2009
But Ken, having a ram drive is so kewl!

You're probably right. Under 98 & 2000 I use to make a lot of use of batch
files. Just not used to thinking of them in Vista.

I'm going to use one as you suggest. Just for my edification, why does the
performance take such a hit? I've got 2MB ram and never go over 75% usage.


Thanks much for the help,
Danno

--

----------
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------



"Ken Blake, MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:13:51 -0600, "Danno" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to find out how to implement a ram drive in Vista.

>
>
> In my view, except for a very rare very special situation, it's
> invariably a very bad thing to do. It reduces the amount of RAM
> available to Windows, and can adversely affect your performance--in
> many cases, very seriously.
>
>
>> It
>> appears that your registry entries will do so.
>>
>> I want to use the ram drive as a place to save files that I will only use
>> in
>> the current session, like unzipping files.

>
>
> There's no need to do that. If you are concerned about keeping those
> temporary files, just create a folder on the hard drive to save them
> in; then write a batch file to delete the contents of that folder, and
> put a shortcut to that batch file in your Startup folder.
>
> The above will accomplish the same thing without hurting your
> performance.
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Blake, MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Jan 2009
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:56:29 -0600, "Danno" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

> But Ken, having a ram drive is so kewl!
>
> You're probably right. Under 98 & 2000 I use to make a lot of use of batch
> files. Just not used to thinking of them in Vista.
>
> I'm going to use one as you suggest. Just for my edification, why does the
> performance take such a hit? I've got 2MB ram and never go over 75% usage.



Most people don't have more RAM than they need, and if they use some
of it for a RAM drive, there is less RAM for Windows.

If you have more RAM than you can use, then, of course, a ram drive
doesn't hurt you. But that's very unusual.


> Thanks much for the help,
> Danno



You're welcome. Glad to help.



> --
>
> ----------
> Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
> ----------
>
>
>
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:13:51 -0600, "Danno" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I've been trying to find out how to implement a ram drive in Vista.

> >
> >
> > In my view, except for a very rare very special situation, it's
> > invariably a very bad thing to do. It reduces the amount of RAM
> > available to Windows, and can adversely affect your performance--in
> > many cases, very seriously.
> >
> >
> >> It
> >> appears that your registry entries will do so.
> >>
> >> I want to use the ram drive as a place to save files that I will only use
> >> in
> >> the current session, like unzipping files.

> >
> >
> > There's no need to do that. If you are concerned about keeping those
> > temporary files, just create a folder on the hard drive to save them
> > in; then write a batch file to delete the contents of that folder, and
> > put a shortcut to that batch file in your Startup folder.
> >
> > The above will accomplish the same thing without hurting your
> > performance.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
> >


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Problem for creating ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk Steve Thackery Windows Vista Performance 1 19th Jan 2009 06:38 PM
Re: Problem for creating ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk Steve Thackery Windows Vista Performance 3 17th Jan 2009 09:10 PM
Re: Problem for creating ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk Ken Blake, MVP Windows Vista Performance 0 16th Jan 2009 09:15 PM
Re: Problem for creating ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk Dave Warren Windows Vista Performance 0 16th Jan 2009 01:51 PM
Re: Problem for creating ReadyBoost on a RAMDisk Dave Warren Windows Vista Performance 0 16th Jan 2009 08:50 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.