Nope..mine is the only computer in the building that
cannot print to it. I use the same drivers on all the
machines so I don't think thats the case. It does not give
any error messages except that the test page failed to
print. But if you go to the Printer's control panel,
Windows 2k shows that it is ready to print. Strange huh?
>-----Original Message-----
>In mixed OS environments, it is essential to have
a "compatible" set of
>drivers on the server and the clients. So, having
the "latest" driver on
>your W2K workstation may not necessarily help if the NT 4
Print Server has
>some other version installed.
>
>"Can't print" comes in many flavours. Do you get an
error message? Does
>the print end up in the print queue on the server? Do
you get garbage
>printed? Does the Print Spooler stop? - on the client or
on the server?
>
>Exactly what edition and version of the driver is
installed on the Print
>Server and the client?
>
>--
>Bruce Sanderson MVP
>
>It's perfectly useless to know the right answer to the
wrong question.
>
>
>"Tony" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:037401c33508$8b4fa910$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> We have an HP 650c plotter in the office connected with
a
>> EDIMAX print share device (IP based). We also have a
>> computer hooked up with all the IP based printers hooked
>> up so that anyone can print to any printer on the
network.
>> I can print to EVERY other printer EXCEPT the plotter. I
>> can ping the IP address of the (1) print server and (2)
>> the computer that controls the printers. I have
installed
>> the printer several times and I seem to be the only
person
>> that cannot print to it. I can log on at another
>> workstation and use my userid and password and I can
print
>> to the plotter so that gets out a profile problem with
the
>> NT server (It runs NT Server Ver 4.0). My account has
>> full administrator rights. I've installed the newest
>> drivers from HP and still nothing. When I reinstall the
>> printer it says its ready. I've flushed the DNS cache
>> several times thinking its looking for the printer
>> elsewhere. I'm totally stumped. What am I overlooking?
>
>
>.
>
|