Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:34:38 +0200, OK wrote:
>>>
>>>> APRIL'S FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> Actually, is DECREASED to 0.61%, down from 0.65% in February:
>>>>
>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/repo...qpcustom=Linux
>>>>
>>>> The future looks bright :-)
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, Vista reached 14.05% in a steady linear growth:
>>>>
>>>>
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/repo...=Windows+Vista
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Linux seems to be losing no matter where you look.
>>> The ODF vs OOXML debates.
>>> Market Share.
>>>
>>> So if you want to be on the losing team, go with Linux.
>>> At least you can say Linux is consistent.
>>>
>>> After 10+ years it still is hovering around 0.6 percent of desktop
>>> market share.
>>>
>>
>> Um, Linux cannot be sold so it therefore has ZERO market share.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Translation: not enough users so it's market share cannot be determined.
> Frank
Again Francis, you've missed the point entirely. Market share cannot be
determined because it's FREE and can be installed on as many computers as
one wants. There is no way to count how many machines Linux is installed
on. I have 6 machines here running Linux. Since they don't need to
be "activated", how can they possibly be counted? Please tell me how you
think they can be counted.
Cheers.
--
A US president declared war on poverty. Poverty won.
Another US president declared a war on drugs. Drugs won.
This US president declared a war on terror. Terror won.
Next?