PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Quietness of 2.5" vs. 1.8" Notebook Drives

 
 
wj777x@netscape.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      6th Apr 2008
I need to replace a 2.5" notebook drive. I can just purchase another
2.5" drive, or there's the possibility of getting a 1.8" drive and a
2.5" - to - 1.8" drive adapter. What II'm curious to know is if anyone
knows to what degree the 1.8" drives are quieter than the 2.5" drives.
They all seem to run at 4200 rpms, so I would think the smaller moter
and platter would make for a quieter drive. The problem is this is
just an assumption. I've looked for dB ratings for the smaller drives
but haven't found any as of yet.

If anyone has any dB info or any personal experience with these two
different size drives, I'd appreciate your sharing this knowledge.

Thank you.

William
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tim_Mac
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      8th Apr 2008
hi william. bear in mind that a 4200 drive will give even more
miserable performance than a 5400 drive. although it should be
marginally quieter. a 10k raptor drive in comparison is a bit of a
tiger.
i've just swapped out my mechanical drive and replaced it with an 8Gb
compact flash card + IDE adaptor. the laptop is now totally silent
except for the quiet fan, and the performance benefit is amazing,
vista boots in about 15 seconds and programs load and close
instantly. vLite enabled a 2Gb vista installation and i don't need a
whole of software on the laptop anyway (office, visual studio, sql
server etc) so it has turned out great. thought you may be interested
if you want to reduce noise. getting rid of the hard drive should
also extend battery life, but i accept that not everyone will be happy
with such limited storage space. you could get a cheap 8 or 16 Gb USB
drive to help. a guide to the steps i took is online at
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=219225

tim

On Apr 6, 11:59 am, wj7...@netscape.net wrote:
> I need to replace a 2.5" notebook drive. I can just purchase another
> 2.5" drive, or there's the possibility of getting a 1.8" drive and a
> 2.5" - to - 1.8" drive adapter. What II'm curious to know is if anyone
> knows to what degree the 1.8" drives are quieter than the 2.5" drives.
> They all seem to run at 4200 rpms, so I would think the smaller moter
> and platter would make for a quieter drive. The problem is this is
> just an assumption. I've looked for dB ratings for the smaller drives
> but haven't found any as of yet.
>
> If anyone has any dB info or any personal experience with these two
> different size drives, I'd appreciate your sharing this knowledge.
>
> Thank you.
>
> William


 
Reply With Quote
 
wj777x@netscape.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10th Apr 2008
Tim,

Thanks for your post. A Flash drive is a great idea, but I need more
space as the 2.5 laptop drive has been used in a desktop unit for its
relative quietness compared to a regular 3.5" drive. So I guess I'll
stay with another 2.5" drive.

Thanks again.

William

On Apr 8, 5:49 pm, Tim_Mac <timm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi william. bear in mind that a 4200 drive will give even more
> miserable performance than a 5400 drive. although it should be
> m++arginally quieter. a 10k raptor drive in comparison is a bit of a
> tiger.
> i've just swapped out my mechanical drive and repla+ced it with an 8Gb
> compact flash card + IDE adaptor. the laptop is now totally silent
> except for the quiet fan, and the performance benefit is amazing,
> vista boots in about 15 seconds and programs load and close
> instantly. vLite enabled a 2Gb vista installation and i don't need a
> whole of software on the laptop anyway (office, visual studio, sql
> server etc) so it has turned out great. thought you may be interested
> if you want to reduce noise. getting rid of the hard drive should
> also extend battery life, but i accept that not everyone will be happy
> with such limited storage space. you could get a cheap 8 or 16 Gb USB
> drive to help. a guide to the steps i took is online athttp://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=219225
>
> tim


 
Reply With Quote
 
John Turco
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11th Apr 2008
Tim_Mac wrote:

<edited for brevity>

> i've just swapped out my mechanical drive and replaced it with an 8Gb
> compact flash card + IDE adaptor. the laptop is now totally silent
> except for the quiet fan, and the performance benefit is amazing,
> vista boots in about 15 seconds and programs load and close
> instantly. vLite enabled a 2Gb vista installation and i don't need a
> whole of software on the laptop anyway (office, visual studio, sql
> server etc) so it has turned out great. thought you may be interested
> if you want to reduce noise. getting rid of the hard drive should
> also extend battery life, but i accept that not everyone will be happy
> with such limited storage space. you could get a cheap 8 or 16 Gb USB
> drive to help. a guide to the steps i took is online at
> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=219225


<edited>

Hello, Tim:

I followed the link you've provided, above...still, I'd be concerned about
flash memory's relatively limited number of rewrite cycles (approximately
100,000, typically), if I were you.

Good luck!


Cordially,
John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)>
 
Reply With Quote
 
JW
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11th Apr 2008
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:10:58 -0500 John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
in Message id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:

>Tim_Mac wrote:
>
><edited for brevity>
>
>> i've just swapped out my mechanical drive and replaced it with an 8Gb
>> compact flash card + IDE adaptor. the laptop is now totally silent
>> except for the quiet fan, and the performance benefit is amazing,
>> vista boots in about 15 seconds and programs load and close
>> instantly. vLite enabled a 2Gb vista installation and i don't need a
>> whole of software on the laptop anyway (office, visual studio, sql
>> server etc) so it has turned out great. thought you may be interested
>> if you want to reduce noise. getting rid of the hard drive should
>> also extend battery life, but i accept that not everyone will be happy
>> with such limited storage space. you could get a cheap 8 or 16 Gb USB
>> drive to help. a guide to the steps i took is online at
>> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=219225

>
><edited>
>
>Hello, Tim:
>
>I followed the link you've provided, above...still, I'd be concerned about
>flash memory's relatively limited number of rewrite cycles (approximately
>100,000, typically), if I were you.


Some industrial flash is good for 2 million writes. Combine that with wear
leveling this is not as bad as you might think. We've shipped over a
thousand XP embedded systems on CF in the last few years, and I've yet to
see a drive wear out.
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Turco
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Apr 2008
JW wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:10:58 -0500 John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
> in Message id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:
>
> >Tim_Mac wrote:
> >
> ><edited for brevity>
> >
> >> i've just swapped out my mechanical drive and replaced it with an 8Gb
> >> compact flash card + IDE adaptor. the laptop is now totally silent
> >> except for the quiet fan, and the performance benefit is amazing,
> >> vista boots in about 15 seconds and programs load and close
> >> instantly. vLite enabled a 2Gb vista installation and i don't need a
> >> whole of software on the laptop anyway (office, visual studio, sql
> >> server etc) so it has turned out great. thought you may be interested
> >> if you want to reduce noise. getting rid of the hard drive should
> >> also extend battery life, but i accept that not everyone will be happy
> >> with such limited storage space. you could get a cheap 8 or 16 Gb USB
> >> drive to help. a guide to the steps i took is online at
> >> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=219225

> >
> ><edited>
> >
> >Hello, Tim:
> >
> >I followed the link you've provided, above...still, I'd be concerned about
> >flash memory's relatively limited number of rewrite cycles (approximately
> >100,000, typically), if I were you.

>
> Some industrial flash is good for 2 million writes. Combine that with wear
> leveling this is not as bad as you might think. We've shipped over a
> thousand XP embedded systems on CF in the last few years, and I've yet to
> see a drive wear out.



Hello, JW:

Oh, I was already aware of "wear leveling," but, didn't know about that "2
million writes" stuff.

Thanks, for the info!


Cordially,
John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)>
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Turco
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Apr 2008
Eric Gisin wrote:
>
> "John Turco" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > JW wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:10:58 -0500 John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
> >> in Message id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:
> >>
> >> >I followed the link you've provided, above...still, I'd be concerned about
> >> >flash memory's relatively limited number of rewrite cycles (approximately
> >> >100,000, typically), if I were you.
> >>
> >> Some industrial flash is good for 2 million writes. Combine that with wear
> >> leveling this is not as bad as you might think. We've shipped over a
> >> thousand XP embedded systems on CF in the last few years, and I've yet to
> >> see a drive wear out.

> >
> > Oh, I was already aware of "wear leveling," but, didn't know about that "2
> > million writes" stuff.
> >

> If you knew about wear leveling all along,
> why do continue to post your paranoid claim about flash memory "wearing out"?



Hello, Eric:

No "paranoia" involved, wise guy. <g> Besides, if the Windows "page file" is
enabled, even 2,000,000 write cycles will be used up, pretty quickly -- wear
leveling, or not.


Cordially,
John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)>
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rod Speed
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Apr 2008
Eric Gisin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
> John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>> Eric Gisin wrote


>>>> Oh, I was already aware of "wear leveling," but, didn't know about that "2 million writes" stuff.


>>> If you knew about wear leveling all along, why do continue to post your paranoid claim about flash memory "wearing
>>> out"?



>> No "paranoia" involved, wise guy. <g>


>> Besides, if the Windows "page file" is enabled, even 2,000,000 write cycles will be used up, pretty quickly -- wear
>> leveling, or not.


> Raving Lunatic.


Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

> Page file I/O is *much* less than your total I/O.


What matters is the write I/O. Your claim is just plain wrong with many Win systems.

> Get some RAM if not.


You still get page file write I/O even with the maximum ram the system can handle.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Arno Wagner
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Apr 2008
Previously John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Eric Gisin wrote:
>>
>> "John Turco" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > JW wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:10:58 -0500 John Turco <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>> >> in Message id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:
>> >>
>> >> >I followed the link you've provided, above...still, I'd be concerned about
>> >> >flash memory's relatively limited number of rewrite cycles (approximately
>> >> >100,000, typically), if I were you.
>> >>
>> >> Some industrial flash is good for 2 million writes. Combine that with wear
>> >> leveling this is not as bad as you might think. We've shipped over a
>> >> thousand XP embedded systems on CF in the last few years, and I've yet to
>> >> see a drive wear out.
>> >
>> > Oh, I was already aware of "wear leveling," but, didn't know about that "2
>> > million writes" stuff.
>> >

>> If you knew about wear leveling all along,
>> why do continue to post your paranoid claim about flash memory "wearing out"?



> Hello, Eric:


> No "paranoia" involved, wise guy. <g> Besides, if the Windows "page
> file" is enabled, even 2,000,000 write cycles will be used up,
> pretty quickly -- wear leveling, or not.


No flash can do 2'000'000 writes per cell. That is after wear
leveling and/or ECC. SLC flash does around 100'000 writes reliably
per cell. MLC is still stuck in the 10'000 range. However wear leveling
and ECC are facts and will extend device life significantly.
Some flash drives can even do defect remapping, AFAIK, which will
extend device life even more.

There are also things you can do to reduce wear. One thing is
realizing that pageing actually can be done on ramdisk to a degree.
Surprising, but true. Pageing is not only about having more memory,
but also about being able to use precious direcly mapped memopry in
multiple instances. Some OSes do not need to do that. Linux, for
example, runns pretty well without swap-space. XP is braind-damaged
that way and needs some minimal amount, which can be provided
on ramdisk.

Side note: The german computer magazine c't occasinally tries
to break FLASH devices by overwriting. So far they have not
succeeded with current memory sticks and SSDs.

Arno
 
Reply With Quote
 
JW
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      18th Apr 2008
On 18 Apr 2008 04:29:00 GMT Arno Wagner <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in Message
id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:

>No flash can do 2'000'000 writes per cell.



http://ec.transcendusa.com/product/I...ID=TS8GCF45I-D
"Endurance: 2,000,000 Program/Erase cycles"

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"notebook layout" in "View" section jlo Microsoft Word Document Management 1 8th Apr 2009 08:35 PM
Disabling device type from "auto detect" to "none" has no effect onslave drives kimiraikkonen Windows XP General 1 14th Jan 2008 01:29 PM
Defaulting drives for "quick removal" not "performance" Black Shuck Windows XP Embedded 3 15th Sep 2006 08:49 PM
Multiple "hard drives" listed on "My Computer" =?Utf-8?B?SU9QU0M=?= Windows XP Help 2 3rd Apr 2005 10:31 PM
Mapped Network Drives, USB Hard drives and "Not enough server storage is available to process this command" CWatters Storage Devices 1 14th Nov 2003 09:35 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM.