I was running it the same way you are, the problem is that the system always
goes "wonky" after a few months. (To the point taht roll backs and restoring
backups don't help). I am trying to build up windows so that the software
does'nt conflict with time and control what software/services runs in the
background (EX: Norton).
You see, my external audio interface is a really touchy "Bitch" (pardon my
language). Too many things make it crash in a firey ball death. I run Cubase
5, which eats alot of processor and memory.
I was hoping to avoid running an external drive for 2 reasons:
1) the delay in writting and playing the wave files to the drive. There is
already quite a delay in events as is (Delay to the card, delay from the
external instruments.)
2)What would be the extra (if any) load on processing.
"Just D." wrote:
> EtherStreams,
>
> > However that I can do, what I am looking to do, I can not put at risk, any
> > of the drives attached to the system (the reason for the dual-boot was to
> > make sure that my studio went completely unaffected by the first
> > installation.)
>
> Well, that sounds strange to me, because I write programs, but I also do
> photo shooting/editing and video recording/editing, and I got same Windows
> and same account for everything and no problems for many years.
>
> > The reason I wish to do this, is so that no users on the "beat up"
> > installation (or myself) can access, change, or delete anything on the
> > drive
> > from that operating system. (Right now I can afford to by a secondary
> > computer to keep it all seperate).
>
> Did you think about external SATA hard drive? It's fast enough and you can
> hide the whole drive with no problems. 
>
> Just D.
>
>
>