"Dave U. Random" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> (Well, gee - Duh! One of the AV geniuses finally figured it out:
> It is a TOTAL waste of time conversing with a psychotic liar and
> evader. It's about time. Oh, by the way, Raid/Dustin Cook also
> offered on his page the program to decrypt the viruses - BUT in
> no way is that to be construed as 'passing' viruses. Jeesh!)
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...f1cad242f42f7c
>
>
> or
>
> http://preview.tinyurl.com/22k77p9
>
>
> Pierre Vandevenne View profile More options Jun 7 2000, 8:00
> am Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus From: pie...@datarescue.com
> (Pierre Vandevenne) Date: 2000/06/07 Subject: Re: HELP!! MS DOS
> window "Scrambler for gigabites" In article
> <012f7070.28e61...@usw-ex0103-023.remarq.com>,
> Raid Slam <soho20NOsoS...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>write more of them, I said I wouldn't spread one. And no, I'm
>>sorry, but offering ENCRYPTED files on a website isn't
>>spreading.
>
> It is spreading, by all definitions : spreading of encrypted
> viruses and spreading of their decryptors. Spreading loaded guns
> with the safety on or with the safety off sin't fundamentally
> different. You are spreading harmful software, with a safety so
> that you can wash your hands.
>
> The problem that makes most discussions with you on this topic
> impossible and a loss of time is that you are simply dishonest
> in the way you present things.
>
> --- Pierre Vandevenne, MD www.datarescue.com, home of the IDA
> Pro Disassembler
>

"One of the AV geniuses"?????

ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!

Get real, you newbie idiot!

"Genius" is "Sugien" in Belgian!

Pierre Vandevenne was a Zvi Netiv lickspittle who waltzed into
the virus newsgroups and accused Rodzilla of being a Nazi. Not
unexpectedly, Rod shoved the Jewboy's head right up his ass.

Ah, how I Iong for The Good Old Days when Rod and Laura ruled
as King and Queen of Cyberspace. This Raid stuff is mild. :-)

As usual Raid changes links and the subject. The subject of this post
is Pierre Vandevenne's assessment of Raid:
"The problem that makes most discussions with you on this topic
impossible and a loss of time is that you are simply dishonest
in the way you present things. "


On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:11:41 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
(Well, gee - Duh! One of the AV geniuses finally figured it out:
It is a TOTAL waste of time conversing with a psychotic liar and
evader. It's about time. Oh, by the way, Raid/Dustin Cook also
offered on his page the program to decrypt the viruses - BUT in
no way is that to be construed as 'passing' viruses. Jeesh!)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...f1cad242f42f7c


or

http://preview.tinyurl.com/22k77p9


Pierre Vandevenne View profile More options Jun 7 2000, 8:00
am Newsgroups: alt.comp.virus From: pie...@datarescue.com
(Pierre Vandevenne) Date: 2000/06/07 Subject: Re: HELP!! MS DOS
window "Scrambler for gigabites" In article
<012f7070.28e61...@usw-ex0103-023.remarq.com>,
Raid Slam <soho20NOsoS...@hotmail.com.invalid> wrote:

>write more of them, I said I wouldn't spread one. And no, I'm
>sorry, but offering ENCRYPTED files on a website isn't
>spreading.

It is spreading, by all definitions : spreading of encrypted
viruses and spreading of their decryptors. Spreading loaded guns
with the safety on or with the safety off sin't fundamentally
different. You are spreading harmful software, with a safety so
that you can wash your hands.

The problem that makes most discussions with you on this topic
impossible and a loss of time is that you are simply dishonest
in the way you present things.

--- Pierre Vandevenne, MD www.datarescue.com, home of the IDA
Pro Disassembler

(E-Mail Removed).?.I.don't.com wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> As usual Raid changes links and the subject. The subject of this post
> is Pierre Vandevenne's assessment of Raid:

As usual, in a failing attempt to critize me, your again giving me credit
for a post I didn't make. Are you going to do this each time you use a
less than perfectly reliable source material/misread said source material
and someone else (not me) calls you on it? Will you next accuse them of
either being me (I don't use an anonymous remailer) or a friend because
they found a flaw in your post and responded to you?

I know you wouldn't talk like you do here with the words you use about me
and what you called my mom in person. No civilized individual would need
to resort to such lame schoolyard antics. The fact you still post
anonymously because you feel the need to protect yourself from me, even
after seeing what I look like (and thanks for the goatee comment, I
hadn't shaved when the picture was taken) only tells me that your a real
coward in real life who won't take any responsibility for his words,
probably because if you mouthed off in person like you do here you'd get
your arse kicked good by whoever you smarted off too.

His words in all fairness could be used verbatim to describe you and
these posts of yours lately. You are certainly being dishonest with your
comments and claims.

You've spent a great deal of time flooding various newsgroups I hangout
in, digging up articles, quoting posts out of context, doing basically
anything you can to try and paint me as some crazy nutjob who's only out
to hurt people. You're failing in this task. It's gotten to the point
now, where I actually find you humourous because it's very easy to take
each post you've made apart if I wanted to take the time. I could respond
in great detail, as I have here with almost all of them.

I'm not doing this for you, but for the readers, so they too can see you
for what you are; it goes both ways.


--
Are you a former BBSer? Want to go back in time to the old days of
ANSI and Renegade? Fire up telnet and go here then: ttb.slyip.com

"Bullwinkle" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:(E-Mail Removed):

> Rambling word wall.

Anything past "but" "and" etc are too complicated for you to follow along
huh? It's okay, I understand.


--
Are you a former BBSer? Want to go back in time to the old days of
ANSI and Renegade? Fire up telnet and go here then: ttb.slyip.com