Thanks.
Unfortunately, I use a laptop (which has a 1.0 GHz Pentium III CPU), so
upgrading the chip will require a new laptop, (~$2000 or so) and would only
result in a 10-15% improvement.
Guess I'll uninstall BCM.
"Travis Rabe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> CPU for starters. Then RAM. If you can do the disk, SCSI is preferred.
>
> Travis
>
>
> "jg70124" <jg70124 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:#(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Upgrade what part of the machine?
> >
> > Does it require more CPU, more RAM, or a faster disk?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > J
> >
> > "Travis Rabe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > The only way would be tp upgrade the machine. BCM uses MSDE and it
runs
> > in
> > > the background. As such, the requirements of the machine to run the
> > > program smoothly are more.
> > >
> > > Travis
> > >
> > > "jg70124" <jg70124 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:#(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > Outlook 2003 on XP Home
> > > >
> > > > I installed Business Contact Manager, but have no data in there yet.
> > > >
> > > > Now, when I type a name to find in contact search box in the menu
bar,
> > it
> > > > takes a long time to return the list of contacts.
> > > >
> > > > In 2002, and in 2003 without BCM, if I put "Pat" in the search box,
I
> > get
> > > a
> > > > list of all the "pat"s in my database in less than a second. With
> BCM,
> > it
> > > > takes 30-45 seconds, and sometimes more. That might not seem like
> much,
> > > but
> > > > when you make 30-40 phone calls a day, as I do, that's a lot of
> waiting
> > > > around.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas on how to improve performance with BCM?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
Similar Threads
