People v Caputo - Exhibit B - 12/03/01 - Caputo Says "anadvocate" Has Been Warned

Received: by nym.alias.net with unique id NakGw1wRvB8xjF for <(E-Mail Removed)>; Mon Dec 3 18:29:04 2001 +0000 (GMT)
X-From: (E-Mail Removed) Mon Dec 03 18:29:04 2001
Received: from (E-Mail Removed) (207.14.113.18) (HELO nacho.alt.net)
by anon.lcs.mit.edu with SMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 18:29:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 25509 invoked by uid 511); 3 Dec 2001 18:27:04 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 18:27:04 -0000
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:27:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Altopia Abuse Admin <(E-Mail Removed)>
To: Sarek <(E-Mail Removed)>
Subject: Re: An Altopia user is forging my name and email
In-Reply-To: <(E-Mail Removed)>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112031026470.25309-(E-Mail Removed)>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

Hi. I have warned the poster. If this forgery continues, please let us
know.

Chris Caputo
President, Altopia Corporation

On 2 Dec 2001, Sarek wrote:
> Hello Mr. Caputo:
>
> One of your users has been threatening me and forging my name by
> mail, and now he is forging my name and posting from Altopia with
> my forged name and real address. I have never given anyone permission
> to use my real nym or real email address, not ever.
>
> Some of the forged posts I saw are below, one crossposted to SEVEN
> GROUPS which aren't even relevant to the content! One post that
> he's replying to was only posted to 2 groups, one NONE. So it's
> pretty obvious what he's trying to do to me. I am getting spam now
> not only from the places he's signing me up to but also because he
> is now forging my real name and address on Usenet.
>
> Please cancel the account of this abuser right away. No one has
> the right to forge my nym and real email address on Usenet.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Path: news.alt.net!usenet
> From: (E-Mail Removed) (Sarek)
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.win95,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,
> alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.kidnapd-harem,
> alt.binaries.warez,alt.binaries.pictures.leek
> Subject: Re: RFC: New WarezFAQ v3.0.5 Proposal (minor revision of 3.0.4)
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:08:56 GMT
> Organization: .
> Lines: 281
> Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
> References: <(E-Mail Removed)>
> Reply-To: (E-Mail Removed)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> I vote "NO" to this half-as*ed FAQ hijack
>
> fix the errors in the real ABWI FAQ and forget this junk
>
> :The alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc FAQ
> :
> :- -Introduction - -
> :
> :The Warez (pronounced "wares") Community is bringing you these
> :answers to some common questions. This document is known as the FAQ.
> :
> :We wish to thank the Inner Circle for reforming this segment of
> :Usenet.
> :
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Path: news.alt.net!usenet
> From: (E-Mail Removed) (Sarek)
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.win95,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,
> alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.kidnapd-harem,
> alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.old,alt.binaries.warez,
> alt.binaries.pictures.leek
> Subject: Re: Request for A Vote
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:17:09 GMT
> Organization: .
> Lines: 71
> Message-ID: <(E-Mail Removed)>
> References: <(E-Mail Removed)>
> Reply-To: (E-Mail Removed)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> crossposted to interested groups
>
> :Subject: Vote.
> :
> :To the following regulars and contributors to the discussion:
>
> that's been carfully kept in .d so as to eliminate any opposing views,
> instead of broadcast widly as it should have been, nice rail-road
> job, guys
>
> some of us have given up on .d for serious discussion and it sure look
> like you've beeen counting on that, otherwise why the rush?
>
> :Adan Etian akula
> :Balto degaussed
> :gypsy John S
> :K-9 Tina
> :ledgerDeMain Mj°lner
> :thurn
> :Zeke
> :
> :I would suggest that we need to decide which path we are to take in
> :designing a new WarezFAQ.
> :A vote of the persons who are regulars or who have contributed to the
> roject so far is requested.
> :
> :*****This is *not* a vote on content but a vote on direction.********
>
> and no third choice of simply fixing the errors and out of date parts
> of the exsiting FAQ, nice rail-road job guys
>
> :Proposition A. <Mjolner>
> :
> :Adoption of RFC 3.0.5 as an interim text post daily FAQ, with a
> :gradual and measured development of an extensive Web-based FAQ. RFC
> :3.0.5 will be the outline, with a comprehensive "How To Post" FAQ for
> :the more technically inclined.
> :
> :The text version will contain Questions and hyper links.
> ocument will be dynamic by democratic process, with multiple access.
> :
> :New Web site due to design and access requirement.
>
> who pays for the site? going to collect IP addresses and sell them to
> SPA/BSA? bet roy wishes he'd thought of that
>
> :Proposition B. <ledgerDeMain/akula>
> :
> :We continue posting the current daily FAQ, while we write a whole,
> :complete, new WebFAQ.
>
> same objection
>
> :Process will result in the following: Post a skeleton text post to
> :the groups with links to a comprehensive Web Site combining the best
> oints of the current FAQ and aKulas proposed FAQ. User friendly in
> :tone, but containing 90% of the information that posters and down
> :loaders need to function in ABW*
> :
> :Probably hosted by current WebMaster.
> :
> :Please vote by 6 PM Eastern Time December 2nd, 2001
>
> hurry, wouldn't want anyone but the .d clic to have any input to the
> railroad job
>
> :george
>


~~~
This PGP signature only certifies the receipt and date of the message.
It implies no approval from the administrators of nym.alias.net.
Date: Mon Dec 3 18:29:04 2001 GMT
To: (E-Mail Removed)