http://www.slipstick.com/emo/2007/up070607.htm#2
resetting the restricted zone to defaults should clear the entire list:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923737
for another workaround, see:
http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?p=151...80e0887#151711
--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours
Need Help with Common Tasks?
http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
Outlook Tips by email:
dailytips-subscribe-(E-Mail Removed)
Outlook Tips:
http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center:
http://www.slipstick.com
Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-(E-Mail Removed)
"GM" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:F63F77F6-8BC0-4AEA-BBC9-(E-Mail Removed)...
> JC: I'm having the EXACT same problems & you have described it exactly as
> I
> would have. I'm waiting for a "fix it" reply too!
>
>
>
> "JC" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running WinXP with SP2, IE7 and Office 2003 professional with all
>> updates
>> installed on a 3GB PC fitted with 1Gb RAM. The PC is probably 3 years
>> old now.
>>
>> Since the May updates I have noticed that Outlook 2003 is slow to open
>> messages
>> when moving the selection bar to or from an HTML message. The delay
>> seems to
>> vary day to day so it is reasonable some days and slow on others. At
>> its worst
>> it can take about 30 secs for some messages to open.
>>
>> Outlook itself opens up at the same speed it always has but opening
>> messages has
>> noticeably slowed down.
>>
>> I read one message about deleting the sites in the IE restricted sites
>> list
>> would help so I checked the IE restricted sites list and there are a heap
>> of
>> sites listed - I couldn't tell how many. It looks like they have to be
>> deleted
>> individually as I couldn't select more than one at a time using the usual
>> <select>, move down the list, <SHIFT> <select> approach. I am not sure
>> that I
>> want to delete them as they are there for my security.
>>
>> I am not sure how relevant the number of sites in the restricted sites
>> list is
>> anyway. The number of sites listed would be of a similar number to what
>> I had
>> prior to noticing the slowdown.
>>
>> This would seem to be related to the security updates issued last month
>> but that
>> may simply be a coincidence. Does anyone have any suggestions?
>> --
>>
>> Cheers . . . JC
>>