In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Loony <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On 11/05/2012 19:30, Loren Pechtel wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 May 2012 12:44:47 +0000 (UTC), John Doe
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>> He says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
>>> reproductive health services...we could lower the population by 10 or
>>> 15%".
>>>
>>> Vaccines are used for birth control?
>>>
>>> I would ask the same about "health care", but everybody knows what
>>> health care is (or at least what it is supposed to be).
>>
>> Note "reproductive health services" in your quote.
>
>It's time that humans stopped breeding like rodents and give our
>polluted planet a chance to recover.
We are so insignificant the the whole scheme of things that the Earth will go
on regardless of us.

Loony <Loony nowhere.con> wrote:

> It's time that humans stopped breeding like rodents and give our
> polluted planet a chance to recover.

More people means more drilling for oil and gas. If I were Mother
and Earth, I certainly wouldn't want that nasty gooey stinky stuff
left inside of me. Mother Earth breathes a sigh of relief with the
drilling of every new oil well.

--














> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.albasani.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
> From: Loony <Loony nowhere.con>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
> Subject: Re: OT Bill Gates "population control with vaccines"
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:25:06 +0100
> Lines: 17
> Message-ID: <a15746FjdvU1 mid.individual.net>
> References: <joj1jv$b7$1 dont-email.me> <i8mqq7tmjtec5n55vb4csp67jraalv447c 4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: individual.net zvcQ6SUlC2WmxqA7VDPiagQJjnBaloauymUKxyuguF6YiVKhmxJ3sgR7SpE1MYIwfI
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pv6P540SBClxRI+ydjprok2lV8M=
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
> In-Reply-To: <i8mqq7tmjtec5n55vb4csp67jraalv447c 4ax.com>
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:22628
>

"Paul" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:jojcss$67c$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Metspitzer wrote:
>
>>
>> I think it is a brilliant idea. A really simple solution to human
>> suffering is to have less humans. The population growth can't
>> continue. It will stop. The most humane way to do that is to lower
>> births.
>
> It will stop, no matter what you do. It's called a sigmoid curve.
>
> http://www.ibguides.com/images/biology/5.3.1.png
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function
>
> "A typical application of the logistic equation is a common model of
> population growth, originally due to Pierre-François Verhulst in 1838,
> where the rate of reproduction is proportional to both the existing
> population and the amount of available resources, all else being equal."
>
> If you test that with single cell organisms, you're likely to get
> the requisite (sigmoid) shape.
>
> When human population is "resource limited", the shape of the
> curve is not likely to be smooth. Likely some big downward spikes.
> That's where intelligence fits in. And lethality multipliers.
>
> At the moment, I don't see intelligence playing much of a part.
>

"Beam me up, Scotty. There's no intelligent life down here."

Sooner or later, growth will stop because of lack of resources (as quoted above). The bad part is, if we (as a race)
wait that long, what will life be like afterwards? I keep thinking of scenes from "Soylent Green" or "Terminator 3."

In reply to GMAN, China really doesn't have a bad idea; they just have a terrible way of going about it.

As far as the "vaccines" go, would reversible sterility until age 21 (or older) really be all that bad an idea? Doesn't
anyone besides me get tired of seeing 15 year old girls wheeling their 2 year olds through the store? Where are the
resources going to come from to support this uneducated horde (since most drop out of school after childbirth) that will
be the next two generations? You can't eat tax dollars, even if there will be a working force left to tax.

I better stop here. I'm sure I'll get enough flame out of this to heat my house this coming winter (unless the
"terrorists" decide to provide us all with a nuclear winter).
--
SC Tom

"SC Tom" <sc tom.net> wrote:

> China really doesn't have a bad idea; they just have a terrible
> way of going about it.

In other words... Your creed is "Greed is good, jobs Americans
won't do, I couldn't care less about anything except money". You
don't think twice about putting your fellow Americans out of work
when you go to the store, so you can save a few pennies.

Communism China sucks. Communist Chinese slave labor sucks. Stop
helping the ruling class destroy our democracy.

--














> --
> SC Tom
>
>
>

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: "SC Tom" <sc tom.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
> Subject: Re: OT Bill Gates "population control with vaccines"
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:45:35 -0400
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 48
> Message-ID: <jok8b0$ibi$1 dont-email.me>
> References: <joj1jv$b7$1 dont-email.me> <gh8qq7dq929755b1fgg8so73mb5avm195t 4ax.com> <jojcss$67c$1 dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 23:45:37 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="B33Ojf2G9vOF5HZV+dLsgg"; logging-data="18802"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GWg4F1DLy0RH2z9DMwuZR"
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:B8q4D/I9SDf179uoqofp7sM2orM=
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:22632
>
>

John Doe wrote:
> "SC Tom" <sc tom.net> wrote:
>
>> China really doesn't have a bad idea; they just have a terrible
>> way of going about it.
>
> In other words... Your creed is "Greed is good, jobs Americans
> won't do, I couldn't care less about anything except money". You
> don't think twice about putting your fellow Americans out of work
> when you go to the store, so you can save a few pennies.
>
> Communism China sucks. Communist Chinese slave labor sucks. Stop
> helping the ruling class destroy our democracy.
>

I think he was referring to the Chinese ideas on limiting population
growth. Where a family is limited as to how many children they can have.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy

Paul

On Fri, 11 May 2012 12:44:47 +0000 (UTC), John Doe
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>If you don't want to read further, this is the question.
>
>Are vaccines used for birth control?
>
>I thought the claim was strange, and maybe Bill Gates misspoke,
>but...
>
>Here is the YouTube video.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9vZL...eature=related
>
>Here is the point of interest.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>feature=player_detailpage&v=T9vZLlJhI7o#t=120s
>
>He says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
>reproductive health services...we could lower the population by 10 or
>15%".
>
>Vaccines are used for birth control?
>
>I would ask the same about "health care", but everybody knows what
>health care is (or at least what it is supposed to be).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou...layer_embedded

Metspitzer <Kilowatt charter.net> wrote:

> John Doe <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>>If you don't want to read further, this is the question.
>>
>>Are vaccines used for birth control?
>>
>>I thought the claim was strange, and maybe Bill Gates misspoke,
>>but...
>>
>>Here is the YouTube video.
>>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9vZL...eature=related
>>
>>Here is the point of interest.
>>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...LlJhI7o#t=120s
>>
>>He says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
>>reproductive health services...we could lower the population by 10 or
>>15%".
>>
>>Vaccines are used for birth control?
>>
>>I would ask the same about "health care", but everybody knows what
>>health care is (or at least what it is supposed to be).
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou...layer_embedded

That would be a good question for Bill Gates to dodge.

Should a poor woman be allowed to have as many children as she
can, with the government supporting her and every last one of her
children?

What if she doesn't want "reproductive health services"...

Women's "rights" advocates have no answer for that question.
Or maybe it's "Let's all be like Communist China."

"John Doe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:jok9f1$lrs$(E-Mail Removed)...
> "SC Tom" <sc tom.net> wrote:
>
>> China really doesn't have a bad idea; they just have a terrible
>> way of going about it.
>
> In other words... Your creed is "Greed is good, jobs Americans
> won't do, I couldn't care less about anything except money". You
> don't think twice about putting your fellow Americans out of work
> when you go to the store, so you can save a few pennies.
>
> Communism China sucks. Communist Chinese slave labor sucks. Stop
> helping the ruling class destroy our democracy.
>
My answer had nothing to do with their politics, greed, or money. The response was to GMAN's reply about birth control,
which is not a bad idea, but their way of going about it is not so good.
--
SC Tom

On Fri, 11 May 2012 19:42:59 GMT, (E-Mail Removed)
(GMAN) wrote:

>In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Loony <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>On 11/05/2012 19:30, Loren Pechtel wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 May 2012 12:44:47 +0000 (UTC), John Doe
>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
>>>> reproductive health services...we could lower the population by 10 or
>>>> 15%".
>>>>
>>>> Vaccines are used for birth control?
>>>>
>>>> I would ask the same about "health care", but everybody knows what
>>>> health care is (or at least what it is supposed to be).
>>>
>>> Note "reproductive health services" in your quote.
>>
>>It's time that humans stopped breeding like rodents and give our
>>polluted planet a chance to recover.
>We are so insignificant the the whole scheme of things that the Earth will go
>on regardless of us.

Earth will. The biosphere, though...

1) We could shoot it out. The result very well might do as much
damage as the KT impactor.

2) If global warming causes the methane hydrate layers to let go we
might do far worse than that. There's a point in the fossil record
that's almost blank due to heat, it could happen again.

On May 12, 12:26*pm, John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> Metspitzer <Kilowatt charter.net> wrote:
> > John Doe <j...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
> >>If you don't want to read further, this is the question.
>
> >>Are vaccines used for birth control?
>
> >>I thought the claim was strange, and maybe Bill Gates misspoke,
> >>but...
>
> >>Here is the YouTube video.
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9vZL...eature=related
>
> >>Here is the point of interest.
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=T9vZLlJhI7o#...
>
> >>He says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
> >>reproductive health services...we could lower the population by 10 or
> >>15%".
>
> >>Vaccines are used for birth control?
>
> >>I would ask the same about "health care", but everybody knows what
> >>health care is (or at least what it is supposed to be).
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou...layer_embedded
>
> That would be a good question for Bill Gates to dodge.
>
> Should a poor woman be allowed to have as many children as she
> can, with the government supporting her and every last one of her
> children?
>
> What if she doesn't want "reproductive health services"...
>
> Women's "rights" advocates have no answer for that question.
> Or maybe it's "Let's all be like Communist China."

I don't have a problem with people having as many kids as they want,
as long as it can be shown that they can fully pay for them at the
time. I do have a problem with the taxpayer paying for people having
kids, (except in the case of legitimate parents becoming
incapacitated, widowed or other things beyond their control)
especially when we are talking about bogans who make a career out of
breeding for welfare income and the taxpayer is forced to foot the
bill for the "child support"