I ran a system scan and it found NewDot spyware. I
directed the scan to delete this hazard. Unfortunately,
it caused my system to corrupt. My advise is to not
remove this hazard, until a safer method can be derived.

Otis--the problem you experienced following newdotnet removal is easily
fixed:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892350

--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Otis" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:43c801c520f0$1c4f0df0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>I ran a system scan and it found NewDot spyware. I
> directed the scan to delete this hazard. Unfortunately,
> it caused my system to corrupt. My advise is to not
> remove this hazard, until a safer method can be derived.

http://www.newdotnet.com

Is NewDotNet Really Spyware?
http://newdotnet.com/spywareinfo.html

Is New.Net spyware,adware, etc....?
http://newdotnet.com/netintegration.html

Lavasoft has determined that New.net does not merit
detection.
http://www.newdotnet.com/lavasoft_letter_010705.pdf

New.net User Privacy and Technical Compatibility
Practices and Policies Report as of June 26, 2003
http://www.new.net/PWC_NewNet_Softwa...cy_Attest_Repo
rt.pdf



>-----Original Message-----
>I ran a system scan and it found NewDot spyware. I
>directed the scan to delete this hazard. Unfortunately,
>it caused my system to corrupt. My advise is to not
>remove this hazard, until a safer method can be derived.
>.
>

Thank you for your guidance. It worked perfectly. :-)
>-----Original Message-----
>Otis--the problem you experienced following newdotnet
removal is easily
>fixed:
>
>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892350
>
>--
>FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
>http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm
>
>"Otis" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>news:43c801c520f0$1c4f0df0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I ran a system scan and it found NewDot spyware. I
>> directed the scan to delete this hazard. Unfortunately,
>> it caused my system to corrupt. My advise is to not
>> remove this hazard, until a safer method can be
derived.
>
>
>.
>

Horsefeathers. If your application had been installed with the users
informed consent, and had an easily found menu entry and removal link,
there'd be no issue.

--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"New.net Support" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:312601c5210c$347193f0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.newdotnet.com
>
> Is NewDotNet Really Spyware?
> http://newdotnet.com/spywareinfo.html
>
> Is New.Net spyware,adware, etc....?
> http://newdotnet.com/netintegration.html
>
> Lavasoft has determined that New.net does not merit
> detection.
> http://www.newdotnet.com/lavasoft_letter_010705.pdf
>
> New.net User Privacy and Technical Compatibility
> Practices and Policies Report as of June 26, 2003
> http://www.new.net/PWC_NewNet_Softwa...cy_Attest_Repo
> rt.pdf
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>I ran a system scan and it found NewDot spyware. I
>>directed the scan to delete this hazard. Unfortunately,
>>it caused my system to corrupt. My advise is to not
>>remove this hazard, until a safer method can be derived.
>>.
>>

"Horsefeathers. "
Gosh Bill, your incredible patience seems to be wearing thin:-)

--
Regards;
Rob
------------------------------------------------------------------------

'sumpin wrong with that language? <G>

There is something about a vendor with the history that this one has, making
posts about their current newly minted innocence that is a little hard to
take.
--
FAQ for Microsoft Antispyware:
http://www.geocities.com/marfer_mvp/FAQ_MSantispy.htm

"Rob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Horsefeathers. "
> Gosh Bill, your incredible patience seems to be wearing thin:-)
>
> --
> Regards;
> Rob
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>