PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

.NET 1.1 and 2.0 on same development machine

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?amxvdG1hcg==?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      19th Jan 2006
As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same machine
at the same time. Can anyone verify that this is correct and there are no
problems related to having both framework versions installed simultaneously?
This is a development machine used for web and windows based applications in
VB.Net & C#.

Thanks for any comments...
--
Jonathan
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Kevin Spencer
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Jan 2006
Yes, this is true. I have been running both on the same machine for about a
year now.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
..Net Developer
Who is Mighty Abbott?
A twin turret scalawag.

"jlotmar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1089E8A2-6CF3-4906-B91D-(E-Mail Removed)...
> As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same
> machine
> at the same time. Can anyone verify that this is correct and there are no
> problems related to having both framework versions installed
> simultaneously?
> This is a development machine used for web and windows based applications
> in
> VB.Net & C#.
>
> Thanks for any comments...
> --
> Jonathan



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Shez
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Jan 2006
I just updated to 2.0 from 1.1 (on XP Pro SP2) and Outlook with the Business
Contact Manager caused Outlook to quit working completely. Only option was
to uninstall 2.0 framework. If anyone else has this experience (and fixed
it) please post solution
"jlotmar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:1089E8A2-6CF3-4906-B91D-(E-Mail Removed)...
> As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same
> machine
> at the same time. Can anyone verify that this is correct and there are no
> problems related to having both framework versions installed
> simultaneously?
> This is a development machine used for web and windows based applications
> in
> VB.Net & C#.
>
> Thanks for any comments...
> --
> Jonathan



 
Reply With Quote
 
Jim Wooley
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Jan 2006
----- Original Message -----
From: "jlotmar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> As I understand, the 1.1 and 2.0 framework can co-exist on the same
> machine
> at the same time. Can anyone verify that this is correct and there are no
> problems related to having both framework versions installed
> simultaneously?
> This is a development machine used for web and windows based applications
> in
> VB.Net & C#.


I have been running 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 (including beta versions) for some time
now without problems. I was even able to uninstall 2.0 betas without 1.0 or
1.1 breaking. The only thing you need to watch for is IIS, making sure it is
using the right framework version in each directory.

Jim Wooley


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Directory structures different on development machine vs. install machine. UJ Microsoft ASP .NET 2 24th Oct 2006 11:35 AM
if i run tap.exe on a windowsxp machine how do i get all the files associated with the pmq onto my development machine's .slx yoyomeltz Windows XP Embedded 3 7th Mar 2006 07:33 AM
Same directory structure on development machine and final machine.... UJ Microsoft ASP .NET 2 20th Feb 2006 09:09 PM
Development Machine and Target Machine Hardware different Rong Windows XP Embedded 7 21st Feb 2005 08:59 PM
Can XPe SP1 and SP2 co-exist on the same development machine? Mark K Vallevand Windows XP Embedded 5 16th Dec 2004 06:34 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 AM.