PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Need Freebie AV that does not have "on access" capability

 
 
terry8@terry.no_place
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2009
I'm using the paid for Avast, which is a p.o.s.

I temporarily need a freebie AV that will not operate "on access". I
don't want it interfering with Avast's on-access capability. Can
someone point one out for me?

I'm bought Avast because I have an older computer and the latest
Kaspersky - which I had used for years and years, would not work with my
XP Pro unless it had service pack 3 in full.

Anyway, I'm getting new box soon and will go back to Kaspersky. In the
meantime I need a half way decent AV to double-check on this p.o.s.
known as Avast.

(All I need is an answer to my question. I'm not going to argue about
Avast.)
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
David H. Lipman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2009
From: <(E-Mail Removed)_place>

| I'm using the paid for Avast, which is a p.o.s.

| I temporarily need a freebie AV that will not operate "on access". I
| don't want it interfering with Avast's on-access capability. Can
| someone point one out for me?

| I'm bought Avast because I have an older computer and the latest
| Kaspersky - which I had used for years and years, would not work with my
| XP Pro unless it had service pack 3 in full.

| Anyway, I'm getting new box soon and will go back to Kaspersky. In the
| meantime I need a half way decent AV to double-check on this p.o.s.
| known as Avast.

| (All I need is an answer to my question. I'm not going to argue about
| Avast.)


ClamAV

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


 
Reply With Quote
 
Buffalo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2009


(E-Mail Removed)_place wrote:
> I'm using the paid for Avast, which is a p.o.s.
>
> I temporarily need a freebie AV that will not operate "on access". I
> don't want it interfering with Avast's on-access capability. Can
> someone point one out for me?
>
> I'm bought Avast because I have an older computer and the latest
> Kaspersky - which I had used for years and years, would not work with
> my XP Pro unless it had service pack 3 in full.
>
> Anyway, I'm getting new box soon and will go back to Kaspersky. In
> the meantime I need a half way decent AV to double-check on this
> p.o.s. known as Avast.
>
> (All I need is an answer to my question. I'm not going to argue about
> Avast.)


Avira AntiVir is available and can easily be taken off 'real-time'
protection by just rt clicking on the taskbar icon and 'unchecking' "AntiVir
Enable".
It will probably go to Enable each time it is booted up.
Buffalo


 
Reply With Quote
 
Max Wachtel
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2009
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:35:55 -0400
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

> From: <(E-Mail Removed)_place>
>
> | I'm using the paid for Avast, which is a p.o.s.
>
> | I temporarily need a freebie AV that will not operate "on access". I
> | don't want it interfering with Avast's on-access capability. Can
> | someone point one out for me?
>
> | I'm bought Avast because I have an older computer and the latest
> | Kaspersky - which I had used for years and years, would not work with my
> | XP Pro unless it had service pack 3 in full.
>
> | Anyway, I'm getting new box soon and will go back to Kaspersky. In the
> | meantime I need a half way decent AV to double-check on this p.o.s.
> | known as Avast.
>
> | (All I need is an answer to my question. I'm not going to argue about
> | Avast.)
>
>
> ClamAV
>

Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

I think your Multi_AV would be an ideal solution. The OP would have 4 scanners to choose from.
--
Max Wachtel
 
Reply With Quote
 
David H. Lipman
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2009
From: "Max Wachtel" <(E-Mail Removed)>




>> ClamAV


| Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

| I think your Multi_AV would be an ideal solution. The OP would have 4 scanners to
| choose from.
| --
| Max Wachtel


I can't argue with that Max :-)

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


 
Reply With Quote
 
idbeholda
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Sep 2009
I have a malware scanner that is fairly quick, however you will need
to have an internet connection to use it. The database that I am
currently in the process of updating will eventually contain over 4.57
million entries for malware. You will need the visual basic 6 runtime
package installed along with richtx32.ocx and msinet.ocx. You will
also need winrar, or some other archive utility that supports
decompression of rar archives installed. With decent internet
latency, the scanner can process up to 50GB of data per minute.

http://www.tot-ltd.org/TT-Livescan.rar
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dustin Cook
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      5th Sep 2009
idbeholda <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:f5cc041e-80df-4da2-91e7-
(E-Mail Removed):

> I have a malware scanner that is fairly quick, however you will need
> to have an internet connection to use it. The database that I am
> currently in the process of updating will eventually contain over 4.57
> million entries for malware. You will need the visual basic 6 runtime
> package installed along with richtx32.ocx and msinet.ocx. You will
> also need winrar, or some other archive utility that supports
> decompression of rar archives installed. With decent internet
> latency, the scanner can process up to 50GB of data per minute.
>
> http://www.tot-ltd.org/TT-Livescan.rar
>


50gb per minute? I'm going to have to check this out myself and see what
you've been upto in the shed... *grin*


--
Dustin Cook [Malware Researcher]
MalwareBytes - http://www.malwarebytes.org
BugHunter - http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outlook 2007: "broken" email capability =?Utf-8?B?YmFtYWdl?= Microsoft Outlook Discussion 3 2nd Oct 2006 04:45 AM
enable small user to have "out of office" capability =?Utf-8?B?aG9zZXJuZWI=?= Microsoft Outlook 4 11th Oct 2005 06:44 AM
No "host" capability in direct cable connection Ron Perry Windows XP Networking 2 12th Jan 2005 03:16 AM
user permission issue - "search" capability ndaniell@uma-inc.org Windows XP New Users 0 6th Jan 2004 07:32 PM
Computer hangs when using "Switch User" capability marc Windows XP General 0 11th Dec 2003 03:46 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM.