Agreed... clusters can be very expensive. It really depends on the what the
server is doing as to whether or not a cluster is appropriate.
one word of advice... stay away from Dell PowerVault shared SCSI cluster
implimentations. We have had more exchange databases get corrupted during
cluster failover that i can tell you about.
NuTs
"Doug" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:07fb01c34188$417a2ef0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi, you're looking or a cluster. Companies such as
> Compaq and Dell have preconfigured cluster solutions that
> will work fine. One thing to ask is do you need the
> availability of a cluster and can you afford it? Many
> people say they need it buy don't really and can't afford
> it. Would a RAID implementation suffice? Like RAID5 + a
> hot spare?
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm looking for a way to give to my server the most
> availability as
> >possible. I think about something like 2 computer
> running win2000 server at
> >the same time with an external raid system that when a
> computer have
> >problem an other take the place automaticaly without any
> interuption. I sit
> >possible? What I need to do that? Does it have special
> hardware or
> >software? Where I can find some document about it?
> >
> >Dany
> >.
> >
|