On Mar 14, 4:03 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.net (GMAN) wrote:
>
> Jesus Christ professor, instead of making zero sense, why dont you direct the
> man to http://www.dlna.org/
>
> That generalized and open standard you speak of is called DNLA!!! and its not
> provided by the panel makers, its standards agreed upon by the indutry.
>
> http://www.dlna.
> org/dlna-for-industry/about-dlna-corporate-history/member-companies
>
> Many TV;s nowadays have DLNA capabilities built into them. And the router he
> has is supposed to stream video and audio from his wireless router directly to
> his TV from a USB attached drive plugged directly into his router.
>
> Did you do too much LSD back in the day???? Becuase what you type makes no
> sense to anybody here.
> .
Amazing, I suppose, perhaps you then should realize there exists a
corporate membership. I had, although only couched in allusions,
referred to that membership in a sense of 'in-house and proprietary'
cases. But, I think I do see where ignoring a triviality associated
with facts, those I didn't care more closely to inspect or specify,
apparently have transgressed past all a meaning I did convey for a sum
impact of affected ingratiation you're sharing with me. Very well.
Might we then attempt to follow this line of reasoning, were I to
further, openly to submit, a) nothing other than Windows Media Player
will play with such devices, and, b) how should you to react to a
prior suspicion, in point of fact, I may already have sensed to know
prior this, viz in that very supposition I stated prior, that another
player, apart from Microsoft's, first be [dis]qualified? I sincerely
hope, beyond Jesus Christ, LSD, and the greater academia, by now I
will have provided some precious means to that modicum you wish to
share with all. . . . By Zeus my dear man, go for it!