Thanks Shock,
I thought it would be better to have a dataset with all the records from the
db in memory, and manipulate the records inside the dataset. Then have a
thread that synchronizes the dataset with db every once in a while.
This server will be accessed by multiple users at once, and if all of them
delete records - the server will have to clear the dataset and refill it
from db every time a record is deleted. If the table contains alot of
records this might be pretty laggy.
This whole thing is in C# btw.
I don't know maybe im just being strange here, ne way I hope someone out
there can clarify this whole thing.
Thanks again,
Val
"Shock" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Val wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Im trying to make a lil database server, it communicates with clients
>> through tcp connections.
>> Its pretty cool so far, but manipulating with the DataSet is messy:
>> There is a function which loads xml data (and schema) into the dataset
>> but whats the way to delete records from a dataset using xml?
>>
>> So far my solution came to this:
>>
>> DataSet "A" - Contains the original records
>> DataSet "B" - Contains same records as "A" but some have deleted
>>
>> 1.Create a new dataset "C" which contains deleted records using
>> "B.GetChanges(DataRowState.Deleted)"
>> 2.Convert "C" into xml string and send it to the server
>>
>> But ones "C" gets to server how do I delete the records in "A" using it?
>> I could use "foreach" on all the records in "A" and delete them if they
>> match records in "C", but surely theres a better way...
>>
>> Thank u!
>> Val
>
> Why not create a collection of objects (i.e. a collection of records to be
> deleted) and pass that collection to the server? Then you could have the
> server create an new instance of each record using an identifer from each
> object (i.e. record). Then simply remove each object (i.e. record) from
> the database. This would be easily implemented using a persistence
> framework such as Gentle.Net
> (http://www.mertner.com/confluence/homepage.action).
>
> This is pretty much the same basic idea, only it is much more OO than just
> using ADO/ADO.NET, easier to implement IMHO, and it would possibly be much
> faster.
>
> Shock