"Hank Oredson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

lDVb.201568$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Yousuf Khan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:KKbVb.9631$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Well, Intel's tradition of finding the most embarrassingly stupid names
on
> > the planet and naming their technology after it continues. Just when you
> > thought that they couldn't get much stupider than Yamhill or Tuckwilla,
> > they've outdone themselves, Clackamas Technology! Aiee!
> >
> > http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103_2-5154924.html
>
>
> Thought I already posted my comment that CT would be Clackamas Technology.
> Getting old (65th birthday was Friday) maybe forgot.
You may have, but my news server is hardly reliable enough to catch
everything. Let's check Google:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22253857
> I live within 1/4 km. of the Clackamas / Yamhill county line :-)
> Seemed obvious when I first saw CT vs. YT.
>
> Wait and watch for MT and WT ... perhaps coming soon.
> Marion and Washington Counties are also adjacent to Yamhill County.
> Washington County is "Intel Land", e.g. IAL is there.
You know maybe because Yamhill may have been an incompatible x86-64
technology to AMD64, therefore they renamed their compatible technology to
Clackamas, since it's almost the same just a next door.
Yousuf Khan