I got a USB flash drive that is formatted with FAT32.
Does this mean that a 64-bit OS cannot be installed on it?
I'm not much of a computer expert...
Thanks.
--
tb

On 04/19/2012 12:05 PM, Grinder wrote:
> On 4/19/2012 11:14 AM, tb wrote:
>> I got a USB flash drive that is formatted with FAT32.
>> Does this mean that a 64-bit OS cannot be installed on it?
>> I'm not much of a computer expert...
>> Thanks.
>
> The 32 in FAT32 is really a different thing than the "bittedness" of an
> operating system, so that technically presents no barrier. However, each
> operating system has a specific set of file systems that they may use
> for the system drive, and the only 64-bit OS that I know of that can use
> FAT32 *might* be Windows XP 64-bit--but I'm not sure about that.
>
>



Sure, XP (64bit) can be installed on a fat32 partition
however no version of Windows is designed to boot from USB
and it requires a "hack"

I've looked and thought it more trouble than it's worth.
The folks who have done it claim it's performance is rather terrible.

OTOH: I've installed Linux on a USB "thumb drive" and it worked fine
and was easy to do

--
https://www.createspace.com/3707686

"Grinder" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On 4/19/2012 11:14 AM, tb wrote:
>> I got a USB flash drive that is formatted with FAT32.
>> Does this mean that a 64-bit OS cannot be installed on it?
>> I'm not much of a computer expert...
>> Thanks.
>
> The 32 in FAT32 is really a different thing than the "bittedness" of an
> operating system, so that technically presents no barrier. However, each
> operating system has a specific set of file systems that they may use for
> the system drive, and the only 64-bit OS that I know of that can use FAT32
> *might* be Windows XP 64-bit--but I'm not sure about that.

If FAT32 is an issue then the USB flash drive can be reformatted to NTFS.
I've done that on one of mine but that was to just to let me copy a larger
file.
--
Brian Cryer
http://www.cryer.co.uk/brian

"philo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:jmpomr$qvd$(E-Mail Removed)...
> On 04/19/2012 12:05 PM, Grinder wrote:
>> On 4/19/2012 11:14 AM, tb wrote:
>>> I got a USB flash drive that is formatted with FAT32.
>>> Does this mean that a 64-bit OS cannot be installed on it?
>>> I'm not much of a computer expert...
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> The 32 in FAT32 is really a different thing than the "bittedness" of an
>> operating system, so that technically presents no barrier. However, each
>> operating system has a specific set of file systems that they may use
>> for the system drive, and the only 64-bit OS that I know of that can use
>> FAT32 *might* be Windows XP 64-bit--but I'm not sure about that.
>>
>
> Sure, XP (64bit) can be installed on a fat32 partition
> however no version of Windows is designed to boot from USB
> and it requires a "hack"
>
> I've looked and thought it more trouble than it's worth.
> The folks who have done it claim it's performance is rather terrible.
>
> OTOH: I've installed Linux on a USB "thumb drive" and it worked fine
> and was easy to do

Isn't the main issue simply whether the OS will let you boot from a USB
drive? I'm sure that XP couldn't care, or am I missing something?
--
Brian Cryer
http://www.cryer.co.uk/brian

Brian Cryer wrote:
> "philo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:jmpomr$qvd$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On 04/19/2012 12:05 PM, Grinder wrote:
>>> On 4/19/2012 11:14 AM, tb wrote:
>>>> I got a USB flash drive that is formatted with FAT32.
>>>> Does this mean that a 64-bit OS cannot be installed on it?
>>>> I'm not much of a computer expert...
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> The 32 in FAT32 is really a different thing than the "bittedness" of an
>>> operating system, so that technically presents no barrier. However, each
>>> operating system has a specific set of file systems that they may use
>>> for the system drive, and the only 64-bit OS that I know of that can use
>>> FAT32 *might* be Windows XP 64-bit--but I'm not sure about that.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, XP (64bit) can be installed on a fat32 partition
>> however no version of Windows is designed to boot from USB
>> and it requires a "hack"
>>
>> I've looked and thought it more trouble than it's worth.
>> The folks who have done it claim it's performance is rather terrible.
>>
>> OTOH: I've installed Linux on a USB "thumb drive" and it worked fine
>> and was easy to do
>
> Isn't the main issue simply whether the OS will let you boot from a USB
> drive? I'm sure that XP couldn't care, or am I missing something?

The keyword is "BootBusExtender". There are a few recipes around.

http://www.techspot.com/community/to...-drive.116114/

Without modification, I've read the boot fails, when the OS does a "reset"
on the USB bus, and promptly loses the ability to continue loading boot
data from the disk. The modification seeks to prevent that interruption,
by having the OS take control of USB, earlier in the process.

Then all you have to solve, is activation, and as long as you only
boot the one computer with it, you're fine.

Paul

GlowingBlueMist wrote:
> On 4/19/2012 11:14 AM, tb wrote:
>> I got a USB flash drive that is formatted with FAT32.
>> Does this mean that a 64-bit OS cannot be installed on it?
>> I'm not much of a computer expert...
>> Thanks.
>
> If you mean can you load a 64-bit version of Windows on a USB and boot
> your computer from that, the easy answer is no. The short answer is the
> USB port gets reset while Windows is still loading from the USB flash.
>
> On the other hand, if you mean can you install a 64-bit version of
> Windows on a USB that can be used to install Windows onto a hard drive,
> then the answer is yes. I believe the Windows 7 USB/DVD download tool
> will reformat the flash as part of the ISO transfer but I'm not 100%
> certain on that.
>
> More on the Window-7-usb tool can be found at this rather long URL,
> among others that a Google search will turn up.
>
> http://www.mydigitallife.info/window...rom-iso-image/
>
>

Yeah, sometimes when you get to this stage, the bar turns red.
And that happens, because the thing that puts the boot info
on the USB stick, fails (bootsect.exe).

http://www.mydigitallife.info/wp-con.../10/wudt-6.jpg

If you want the least trouble with that tool, try it from a computer
running 64 bit Windows. I think then, it wouldn't matter whether
the extracted bootsect.exe was 32 bit or 64 bit.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...4?dmode=source

Paul