IBM's PowerPC-based CPU called 'Broadway' for the Nintendo Revolution
is almost definitally going to be based on one of two designs: a.) the
PPE (PowerPC Processing Element ) that is used in Xenon/Waternoose
(Xbox 360's triple-core CPU) and Cell --
or b.) the PowerPC 970FX.


Ars Technica speculates in this article:
http://arstechnica.com/articles/paed...revolution.ars

really worth reading. Hannibal thinks that Broadway (Revolution's CPU)
is going to be the best next-gen CPU for gameplay control code and will
have the largest L2 cache at 2 MB (Xbox 360 CPU has 1 MB of L2 and
PS3's Cell has half a MB (512K). that makes perfect sense--Gamecube's
Gekko CPU had the largest amount of L2 cache of any current-gen
console, 256K, compared to 128K in Xbox CPU and even less in PS2's
Emotion Engine. the Revolution's Broadway CPU is likely to have 1 or
2 PPE cores and would therefore be able to process 2 or 4 threads, but
would be more effecient and easier to use than either Xbox360's
tri-core Xenon CPU or PS3's Cell.

Oh, my!

--
Keith

this is just a test. I am checking if i can start posting essages, but
the topic you are discussing is so interesting.

this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
messages are not displayed?

this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
messages are not displayed?

"Computer Freak" <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:

> this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
> messages are not displayed?
>

They are. Some mailreaders and some mailservers are configured so you
don't see your own posts; the rest of us have seen at least three from
you.

It is customary to send test messages to alt.test, rather than
clogging three newsgroups with crossposted tests.
--
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer
skype: jjpfeifferjr

"Computer Freak" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
> messages are not displayed?
>
Becuz u r n idiot too stupid to read usenet. Which group do you read,
moron?

On 02 Nov 2005 13:05:41 -0700 Joe Pfeiffer <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
Message id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:

>"Computer Freak" <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>
>> this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
>> messages are not displayed?
>>
>
>They are. Some mailreaders and some mailservers are configured so you
>don't see your own posts; the rest of us have seen at least three from
>you.
>
>It is customary to send test messages to alt.test, rather than
>clogging three newsgroups with crossposted tests.

Testing... testing...

On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:41:00 -0500, Trent wrote:

> On 02 Nov 2005 13:05:41 -0700 Joe Pfeiffer <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> Message id: <(E-Mail Removed)>:
>
>>"Computer Freak" <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>>
>>> this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
>>> messages are not displayed?
>>>
>>
>>They are. Some mailreaders and some mailservers are configured so you
>>don't see your own posts; the rest of us have seen at least three from
>>you.
>>
>>It is customary to send test messages to alt.test, rather than
>>clogging three newsgroups with crossposted tests.
>
> Testing... testing...

Your article didn't get posted. Try again.

--
Keith

no problems here
"Computer Freak" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> this is another test. Hope it works this time. I wondery why my
> messages are not displayed?
>