But have we traded one kind of DLL hell for another? How many versions of
the Framework are loaded on your system? How is COM-based DLL management any
different than GAC-cached modules that can be replaced without retesting the
consumer applications? Since we now must wait while the code is compiled
before it can be executed, the performance argument might not hold water for
some applications. Notice how long it takes to launch the Report Manager...
I expect that managed code has managed to disenfranchise a lot of perfectly
good COM developers...
--
__________________________________________________________________________
William R. Vaughn
President and Founder Beta V Corporation
Author, Mentor, Dad, Grandpa
Microsoft MVP
(425) 556-9205 (Pacific time)
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
____________________________________________________________________________________________
"Juan T. Llibre" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OJP$(E-Mail Removed)...
> re:
> !> What are the advantages actually achieved of managed code?
>
> Imho, the greatest achievement for managed code is: it gets rid of "dll
> hell".
>
> There's also automatic memory management, platform-neutrality, and
> cross-language integration.
>
> Performance benefits are gained from executing all code in the CLR.
> Calling unmanaged code decreases performance because additional security
> checks are required.
>
> Other performance advantages are available through the use of the
> Just-In-Time compiler,
> with gains in built-in security by using code access security and the
> avoidance of buffer overruns.
>
>
>
>
> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
> asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> ======================================
> "John" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%23A%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hi
>>
>> What are the advantages actually achieved of managed code? I am not
>> talking of theory but in reality.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>
>