PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

fill in spec #s pls: need new MB; had bx, cusl2-c; ram, FSB, etc...

 
 
kgs
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Nov 2003
I don't know what to look for in a new board.
what items are new for a P4?

I assume pc 133 ram is now pc400

What about FSB

Don't need:
dual processor
expensive technology e/.g 800RAM
scsi
network: I use a pci ethernet and router
onboard video or audio: I use SBlive 5.1 pci, and a Radeon 7200 64 VIVO
AGP4X.
Also have USR V90 pci, 192 MB pc133, 30GB deskstar ATA-100

Basically, what board should I be looking at, probably in Asus?
don't think going to a PIII 1gb from my current 600 Celeron-a mistake-low on
funds a while back.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
kgs
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Nov 2003
don't do anything to excess. I've never even used my Pioneer 16x DVD player
Not gonna spend on a very best processor either. The upgrade itself is what
I'm asking for, not any other perforamnce improvement for any speicifis
reason. I've got a brand new 300W power supply, and the case is great, and
happy with everything else.
THINK I'll need board, processor, and RAm only. If I could pay less for the
MB, RAM, and processor e.g. say $400CDN for 2.0GB, std. board, and 512 pc400
RAM, and save a few hunred I would like to know what that board was. Don't
know the current specs, so I can't shop. Don't think I'll need to with the
right info, just look for the best price.
ANybody know where I'm coming from?



"kgs" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:XXBpb.176468$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I don't know what to look for in a new board.
> what items are new for a P4?
>
> I assume pc 133 ram is now pc400
>
> What about FSB
>
> Don't need:
> dual processor
> expensive technology e/.g 800RAM
> scsi
> network: I use a pci ethernet and router
> onboard video or audio: I use SBlive 5.1 pci, and a Radeon 7200 64 VIVO
> AGP4X.
> Also have USR V90 pci, 192 MB pc133, 30GB deskstar ATA-100
>
> Basically, what board should I be looking at, probably in Asus?
> don't think going to a PIII 1gb from my current 600 Celeron-a mistake-low

on
> funds a while back.
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Nov 2003
In article
<57Cpb.176548$(E-Mail Removed)>, "kgs"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> don't do anything to excess. I've never even used my Pioneer 16x DVD player
> Not gonna spend on a very best processor either. The upgrade itself is what
> I'm asking for, not any other perforamnce improvement for any speicifis
> reason. I've got a brand new 300W power supply, and the case is great, and
> happy with everything else.
> THINK I'll need board, processor, and RAm only. If I could pay less for the
> MB, RAM, and processor e.g. say $400CDN for 2.0GB, std. board, and 512 pc400
> RAM, and save a few hunred I would like to know what that board was. Don't
> know the current specs, so I can't shop. Don't think I'll need to with the
> right info, just look for the best price.
> ANybody know where I'm coming from?


So, let us work the problem backwards. What can $400 CDN ($296 US) buy ?
Using newegg.com solely for pricing purposes:

512MB PC3200 (DDR400) - you didn't state CAS2, CAS2.5, CAS3 (lower
is better). Best price $77.00 US and it is probably CAS3...

Intel processors:

2.0GHZ processor 400MHz FSB 128KB cache (Celeron P4) $62.50
2.0GHz processor 400MHz FSB 512KB cache (Pentium P4) $135.00
2.4GHz processor 533MHz FSB 512KB cache (Pentium P4) $167.99
2.4Ghz processor 800MHz FSB 512KB cache (Pentium P4) $182.00

If we use the Celeron, this leaves $156.50, but we don't get the best
use of the DDR400 ram. Usually the ram can be run one "notch" higher
than the FSB. FSB400 = DDR200 or DDR266. FSB533 = DDR266 or DDR333.
FSB800 = DDR400+. At the other extreme, choosing the $182 processor
leaves only $37 for a motherboard. The FSB533 leaves us with $51,
which is a pretty low target to hit. Of the other two choices, the
extra cache buys you a few hundred MHz equivalent performance, so
once the motherboard is selected, a faster Celeron with 128KB
can be used instead.

P4PE-X $77 (Official FSB800 support, otherwise a stripped down P4PE)
P4G8X $80 (Dual channel DDR266, FSB533)
P4P8X $89 (Dual channel DDR333, FSB533)
P4PE $95 (Single channel DDR333, FSB533 - 2x512MB max mem cheaply)
P4P800 $104 (Dual channel DDR400, FSB800, non-deluxe model)
P4P800 $129 (Dual channel DDR400, FSB800, deluxe model)

If you buy the P4P800 (non-deluxe), you can stick more memory or a
better processor in it later. Since the P4P800 is dual channel, we
can use (2) 256MB memory modules. With the money left, buy a better
processor.

Budget (US Dollars) $296
P4P800 non-deluxe $104
256MB PC3200 (DDR400) CAS3 Infineon N82E16820200038 $41 * 2 = $ 82
Celeron FSB400 128KB cache 2.7GHz $108
Left over money $ 2

(If you did buy the 2.0GHz Celeron for $62.50, you could try
overclocking it to FSB533. See http://www.cpudatabase.com/CPUdb/
and the entry for P4 Celeron 2.0. That would give you a core
speed of 2.66GHz, and the faster FSB533 would give you more memory
bandwidth for less money. Leftover money now $47.50 US. With that
money, you could go for the P4P800 Deluxe at $129 if you want.)

Chances are, for the same money, you can get more kick from a
A7N8X Nforce2 plus a Athlon XP2500+. On a Pentium system,
overclocking is via FSB adjustment. On the A7N8X, it is best to
keep FSB and memory clock the same - you can then crank both of
them up an extra notch, and as well, you can adjust the multiplier.

Budget (US Dollars) $296
A7N8X deluxe $125
Athlon XP 2500+ (overclock to 3200+ level with DDR400 rates) $ 85
256MB PC3200 (DDR400) CAS3 Infineon N82E16820200038 $41 * 2 = $ 82
Left over money ($39 leftover with A7N8X non-deluxe) $ 4

As before, the non-deluxe is cheaper, in this case the A7N8X
non-deluxe is $90 US, a considerable saving.

To review all the options, start here:

http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/mbindex.htm

Summaries are here, but they don't list onboard peripherals:

http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/overview_p4.htm
http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/overview_amd.htm

Oh, one other thing. The amount of +12V power you need...

2.0Ghz Celeron FSB400 128K cache 53W max
2.7Ghz Celeron FSB400 128K cache 67W max
AthlonXP 2500+ FSB333 512K cache 54W max
AthlonXP 3200+ FSB400 512K cache 61W max

At 67W, this is (67/12)*1.25 = 7 amps from the +12V supply.

Processor max consumption from +12V = 7 amps
Disk drive = 2 amps during POST, 0.5 amps idle
Cooling fans = 1 amp
Video card = 3 amps if separate power cable

If you have an older video card without a separate power cable, power
comes from the other rails. Since power numbers for video cards aren't
published, the 3 amp number is just a guess. With the older video
card, a running system will draw 8.5 amps (Prime95 or 3DMark). With a
newer video card with separate power, the number could be more than
11.5 amps (3DMark). The video card only draws large currents while
doing 3D stuff. Compare these numbers to the amps printed on the
label of your new power supply.

Have fun shopping,
Paul

>
>
>
> "kgs" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:XXBpb.176468$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I don't know what to look for in a new board.
> > what items are new for a P4?
> >
> > I assume pc 133 ram is now pc400
> >
> > What about FSB
> >
> > Don't need:
> > dual processor
> > expensive technology e/.g 800RAM
> > scsi
> > network: I use a pci ethernet and router
> > onboard video or audio: I use SBlive 5.1 pci, and a Radeon 7200 64 VIVO
> > AGP4X.
> > Also have USR V90 pci, 192 MB pc133, 30GB deskstar ATA-100
> >
> > Basically, what board should I be looking at, probably in Asus?
> > don't think going to a PIII 1gb from my current 600 Celeron-a mistake-low

> on
> > funds a while back.
> >
> >

 
Reply With Quote
 
Aussie
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Nov 2003
Mate , this is fantastic..U should run a service of some sort..Altough i
didnt ask the question but i'll take everything onboard just in case..TX
again and keep us informed.

Have Nice Day......

"Paul" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:nospam-0311032234040001@192.168.1.177...
> In article
> <57Cpb.176548$(E-Mail Removed)>, "kgs"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> > don't do anything to excess. I've never even used my Pioneer 16x DVD

player
> > Not gonna spend on a very best processor either. The upgrade itself is

what
> > I'm asking for, not any other perforamnce improvement for any speicifis
> > reason. I've got a brand new 300W power supply, and the case is great,

and
> > happy with everything else.
> > THINK I'll need board, processor, and RAm only. If I could pay less for

the
> > MB, RAM, and processor e.g. say $400CDN for 2.0GB, std. board, and 512

pc400
> > RAM, and save a few hunred I would like to know what that board was.

Don't
> > know the current specs, so I can't shop. Don't think I'll need to with

the
> > right info, just look for the best price.
> > ANybody know where I'm coming from?

>
> So, let us work the problem backwards. What can $400 CDN ($296 US) buy ?
> Using newegg.com solely for pricing purposes:
>
> 512MB PC3200 (DDR400) - you didn't state CAS2, CAS2.5, CAS3 (lower
> is better). Best price $77.00 US and it is probably CAS3...
>
> Intel processors:
>
> 2.0GHZ processor 400MHz FSB 128KB cache (Celeron P4) $62.50
> 2.0GHz processor 400MHz FSB 512KB cache (Pentium P4) $135.00
> 2.4GHz processor 533MHz FSB 512KB cache (Pentium P4) $167.99
> 2.4Ghz processor 800MHz FSB 512KB cache (Pentium P4) $182.00
>
> If we use the Celeron, this leaves $156.50, but we don't get the best
> use of the DDR400 ram. Usually the ram can be run one "notch" higher
> than the FSB. FSB400 = DDR200 or DDR266. FSB533 = DDR266 or DDR333.
> FSB800 = DDR400+. At the other extreme, choosing the $182 processor
> leaves only $37 for a motherboard. The FSB533 leaves us with $51,
> which is a pretty low target to hit. Of the other two choices, the
> extra cache buys you a few hundred MHz equivalent performance, so
> once the motherboard is selected, a faster Celeron with 128KB
> can be used instead.
>
> P4PE-X $77 (Official FSB800 support, otherwise a stripped down P4PE)
> P4G8X $80 (Dual channel DDR266, FSB533)
> P4P8X $89 (Dual channel DDR333, FSB533)
> P4PE $95 (Single channel DDR333, FSB533 - 2x512MB max mem cheaply)
> P4P800 $104 (Dual channel DDR400, FSB800, non-deluxe model)
> P4P800 $129 (Dual channel DDR400, FSB800, deluxe model)
>
> If you buy the P4P800 (non-deluxe), you can stick more memory or a
> better processor in it later. Since the P4P800 is dual channel, we
> can use (2) 256MB memory modules. With the money left, buy a better
> processor.
>
> Budget (US Dollars) $296
> P4P800 non-deluxe $104
> 256MB PC3200 (DDR400) CAS3 Infineon N82E16820200038 $41 * 2 = $ 82
> Celeron FSB400 128KB cache 2.7GHz $108
> Left over money $ 2
>
> (If you did buy the 2.0GHz Celeron for $62.50, you could try
> overclocking it to FSB533. See http://www.cpudatabase.com/CPUdb/
> and the entry for P4 Celeron 2.0. That would give you a core
> speed of 2.66GHz, and the faster FSB533 would give you more memory
> bandwidth for less money. Leftover money now $47.50 US. With that
> money, you could go for the P4P800 Deluxe at $129 if you want.)
>
> Chances are, for the same money, you can get more kick from a
> A7N8X Nforce2 plus a Athlon XP2500+. On a Pentium system,
> overclocking is via FSB adjustment. On the A7N8X, it is best to
> keep FSB and memory clock the same - you can then crank both of
> them up an extra notch, and as well, you can adjust the multiplier.
>
> Budget (US Dollars) $296
> A7N8X deluxe $125
> Athlon XP 2500+ (overclock to 3200+ level with DDR400 rates) $ 85
> 256MB PC3200 (DDR400) CAS3 Infineon N82E16820200038 $41 * 2 = $ 82
> Left over money ($39 leftover with A7N8X non-deluxe) $ 4
>
> As before, the non-deluxe is cheaper, in this case the A7N8X
> non-deluxe is $90 US, a considerable saving.
>
> To review all the options, start here:
>
> http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/mbindex.htm
>
> Summaries are here, but they don't list onboard peripherals:
>
> http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/overview_p4.htm
> http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/overview_amd.htm
>
> Oh, one other thing. The amount of +12V power you need...
>
> 2.0Ghz Celeron FSB400 128K cache 53W max
> 2.7Ghz Celeron FSB400 128K cache 67W max
> AthlonXP 2500+ FSB333 512K cache 54W max
> AthlonXP 3200+ FSB400 512K cache 61W max
>
> At 67W, this is (67/12)*1.25 = 7 amps from the +12V supply.
>
> Processor max consumption from +12V = 7 amps
> Disk drive = 2 amps during POST, 0.5 amps idle
> Cooling fans = 1 amp
> Video card = 3 amps if separate power cable
>
> If you have an older video card without a separate power cable, power
> comes from the other rails. Since power numbers for video cards aren't
> published, the 3 amp number is just a guess. With the older video
> card, a running system will draw 8.5 amps (Prime95 or 3DMark). With a
> newer video card with separate power, the number could be more than
> 11.5 amps (3DMark). The video card only draws large currents while
> doing 3D stuff. Compare these numbers to the amps printed on the
> label of your new power supply.
>
> Have fun shopping,
> Paul
>
> >
> >
> >
> > "kgs" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:XXBpb.176468$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I don't know what to look for in a new board.
> > > what items are new for a P4?
> > >
> > > I assume pc 133 ram is now pc400
> > >
> > > What about FSB
> > >
> > > Don't need:
> > > dual processor
> > > expensive technology e/.g 800RAM
> > > scsi
> > > network: I use a pci ethernet and router
> > > onboard video or audio: I use SBlive 5.1 pci, and a Radeon 7200 64

VIVO
> > > AGP4X.
> > > Also have USR V90 pci, 192 MB pc133, 30GB deskstar ATA-100
> > >
> > > Basically, what board should I be looking at, probably in Asus?
> > > don't think going to a PIII 1gb from my current 600 Celeron-a

mistake-low
> > on
> > > funds a while back.
> > >
> > >



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inheritance of static members in the CLR spec vs the C# spec Tim Van Wassenhove Microsoft C# .NET 2 18th Aug 2007 10:35 PM
Re: Inheritance of static members in the CLR spec vs the C# spec GlennDoten Microsoft C# .NET 0 18th Aug 2007 05:06 PM
CUSL2-C Scott Asus Motherboards 3 4th Dec 2005 08:43 AM
CUSL2-C Martin Bach Asus Motherboards 0 31st Dec 2004 07:52 AM
CUSL2-C & AGP Skip Maletz Asus Motherboards 3 6th Aug 2003 07:33 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 PM.