PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

E7300 vs Q8200

 
 
HDI
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2009
Hi,

Which one should be better for a administrative task like office?
I thought E7300 should be a good choose but the shopkeeper said Q8200
would be better. I always thought that you had to choose a quad when
you want to do video, 3D or gaming and the dual core should be fine
for adminstration.

What is your opinion?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Jun 2009
HDI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which one should be better for a administrative task like office?
> I thought E7300 should be a good choose but the shopkeeper said Q8200
> would be better. I always thought that you had to choose a quad when
> you want to do video, 3D or gaming and the dual core should be fine
> for adminstration.
>
> What is your opinion?



E7300 2.66GHz/FSB1066/3MB L2 dual core 45nm 65W TDP

http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLAPB

Q8200 2.33GHz/FSB1333/4MB L2 quad core 45nm 95W TDP

http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLB5M

In single threaded tasks, the 2.66GHz core is going to beat
the 2.33GHz core.

Given the choice, I'd rather have the faster dual core E7300.
My current computer uses a Core2 2.6Ghz dual, so I didn't buy
into the "quad thing".

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jun 2009

"HDI" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:093fee2e-020c-47a3-b534-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
>
> Which one should be better for a administrative task like office?
> I thought E7300 should be a good choose but the shopkeeper said Q8200
> would be better. I always thought that you had to choose a quad when
> you want to do video, 3D or gaming and the dual core should be fine
> for adminstration.
>
> What is your opinion?


I run an E7300 admittedly overclocked to 3.2GHz. I haven't noticed any lack
of real world performance in any program. It has a really low power
consumption most of the time on an Asus board with all the power saving
speed-step & fan stuff on, and makes for a an almost silent efficient PC
with the option of going to quad core if it ever proves necessary (unlikely
IMHO). I built mine 7 months ago and it was the obvious solution to my
needs at that time, but AMD now have options and shouldn't be ignored.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Get to BIOS on HP Pavilion Q8200? Ritter197 Windows XP Hardware 9 15th Apr 2010 02:23 AM
My HP Pavilion Q8200 scores low Ritter197 Windows XP General 12 10th Apr 2010 08:30 PM
HP Pavilion Q8200 scores low Ritter197 Windows Vista Hardware 0 8th Apr 2010 02:32 AM
Re: Intel Quad Q8200 Paul Computer Hardware 0 9th Aug 2009 10:21 PM
Re: Very high CPU temp on E7300 Carl Parisien Natick MA DIY PC 0 27th Mar 2009 03:50 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 AM.