Hello guys
I would like to know what is the normal duration of the appearance of
the WinXP boot icon during the start up.
Which should be longer the appearance of the blank screen or the
appearance of the XP Icon?
I had observed that its not the same in every WinXP run PC. Therefore
there should be a bench mark to check, as that will indicate if right
at the start there is some abnormality in your or someone else PC...
Or does this makes the difference, if there is a long time lag before
the XP boot icon disappears?
TIA

Roy <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hello guys
>I would like to know what is the normal duration of the appearance of
>the WinXP boot icon during the start up.
>Which should be longer the appearance of the blank screen or the
>appearance of the XP Icon?
>I had observed that its not the same in every WinXP run PC. Therefore
>there should be a bench mark to check, as that will indicate if right
>at the start there is some abnormality in your or someone else PC...
>Or does this makes the difference, if there is a long time lag before
>the XP boot icon disappears?
>TIA

What do you consider to be "long time lag"?

Each machine will be somewhat different for a lot of good reasons.

On Apr 21, 1:45*pm, Mike Torello <torel...@chicoplt.com> wrote:
> Roy <royba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hello guys
> >I would like to know what is the normal duration of the appearance of
> >the WinXP boot icon during the start up.
> >Which should be longer the appearance of the blank screen or the
> >appearance of the XP Icon?
> >I had observed that its not the same in every WinXP run PC. Therefore
> >there should be a bench mark to check, as that will indicate if right
> >at the start there is some abnormality in your or someone else PC...
> >Or does this makes the difference, if there is a long time lag before
> >the XP boot icon disappears?
> >TIA
>
> What do you consider to be "long time lag"?
>
> Each machine will be somewhat different for a lot of good reasons.

I just noticed that my PC takes about a minute for that ...my work pc
only took half that long, my colleagues pc about 35 seconds,
So,,... its not an abnormality of that XP icon display takes longer?

Roy

What are the competing hartdware specifications -CPU capacity, RAM etc?

What software is scheduled to load when booting? Is there software loading
which does need to load on booting?

How well is the computer maintained? Disk CleanUp, Defragmenting etc. Good
maintenance does NOT include using a Registry Cleaner or installing
optimisers etc.

You can only really make sure that the computer works efficiently to achieve
the optimum performance of the available computer hardware.This can be
improved where for example the limited quantity of available RAM is a
bottleneck.

Make sure there are no unnecessary errors and warnings in Event Viewer.

Have a look in the System and Application logs in Event Viewer for Errors
and Warnings and post copies here. Don't post any more than 48 hours ago.

You can access Event Viewer by selecting Start, Control Panel,
Administrative Tools, and Event Viewer. When researching the meaning
of the error, information regarding Event ID, Source and Description
are important.

A tip for posting copies of Error Reports! Run Event Viewer and double
click on the error you want to copy. In the window, which appears is a
button resembling two pages. Click the button and close Event
Viewer.Now start your message (email) and do a paste into the body of
the message. Make sure this is the first paste after exiting from
Event Viewer.

--


Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Roy wrote:
> On Apr 21, 1:45 pm, Mike Torello <torel...@chicoplt.com> wrote:
>> Roy <royba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello guys
>>> I would like to know what is the normal duration of the appearance
>>> of the WinXP boot icon during the start up.
>>> Which should be longer the appearance of the blank screen or the
>>> appearance of the XP Icon?
>>> I had observed that its not the same in every WinXP run PC.
>>> Therefore there should be a bench mark to check, as that will
>>> indicate if right at the start there is some abnormality in your or
>>> someone else PC... Or does this makes the difference, if there is a
>>> long time lag before the XP boot icon disappears?
>>> TIA
>>
>> What do you consider to be "long time lag"?
>>
>> Each machine will be somewhat different for a lot of good reasons.
>
> I just noticed that my PC takes about a minute for that ...my work pc
> only took half that long, my colleagues pc about 35 seconds,
> So,,... its not an abnormality of that XP icon display takes longer?

BTW does the tune up tools ( like tune up utilities 2009slow down the
PC)?
Regarding the event viewer I can’t access as it’s not found in my
administrative tools but only the short cut for the netframework 2.
Mind if you tell me how to put that event viewer there?

On Apr 21, 6:49 pm, "Gerry" <ge...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Roy
>
> What are the competing hardware specifications -CPU capacity, RAM etc?
RAM, CPU type?
Does not make sense to me as the workplace Pc is just Celeron type
with DDR 256Ram my PC is Pentium M 780 2.26ghz, with 2 gig DDR2 ram .
therefore hardware configuration is out of the question… the work
place pc boots up faster than mine.

> What software is scheduled to load when booting? Is there software loading
> which does need to load on booting?
Software, Adobe Gamma, Adobe reader,Internet Explorer, Microsoft
Outlook, Orbit downloader, Statease Design Expert.
Work Pc software loading, almost the same…

> How well is the computer maintained? Disk CleanUp, Defragmenting etc. Good
> maintenance does NOT include using a Registry Cleaner or installing
> optimisers etc.
MY PC is regularly cleaned up, defragged,
BTW, what has the Tune Up utilities 2009 have to do with that?
When they just optimize your pc performance?

> You can only really make sure that the computer works efficiently to achieve
> the optimum performance of the available computer hardware.This can be
> improved where for example the limited quantity of available RAM is a
> bottleneck.

Well mine with full RAM capacity shows bottleneck if compared to the
inferior pc of my workplace….
>
> Make sure there are no unnecessary errors and warnings in Event Viewer.

Well I can’t check that out as I can access Event viewer as its not in
my administrative tools but only the Microsoft Net framework 2
shortcut.

Any ideas how to put Event viewer in my PC? Thanks >

Roy

Tune up utilities 2009 falls into the category of software many in these
newsgroups would not recommend. They offer dubious benefits. I would not use
Tune up utilities 2009. Not having used the software I cannot say what
affect it would have on system performance.

HOW TO: View and Manage Event Logs in Event Viewer in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308427/en-us

Also you can access Event Viewer by selecting Start, Run, type "eventvwr.msc
/s" without the quotes and hit ENTER.

--


Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Roy wrote:
> BTW does the tune up tools ( like tune up utilities 2009slow down the
> PC)?
> Regarding the event viewer I can’t access as it’s not found in my
> administrative tools but only the short cut for the netframework 2.
> Mind if you tell me how to put that event viewer there?
>
> On Apr 21, 6:49 pm, "Gerry" <ge...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Roy
>>
>> What are the competing hardware specifications -CPU capacity, RAM
>> etc?
> RAM, CPU type?
> Does not make sense to me as the workplace Pc is just Celeron type
> with DDR 256Ram my PC is Pentium M 780 2.26ghz, with 2 gig DDR2 ram .
> therefore hardware configuration is out of the question… the work
> place pc boots up faster than mine.
>
>> What software is scheduled to load when booting? Is there software
>> loading which does need to load on booting?
> Software, Adobe Gamma, Adobe reader,Internet Explorer, Microsoft
> Outlook, Orbit downloader, Statease Design Expert.
> Work Pc software loading, almost the same…
>
>> How well is the computer maintained? Disk CleanUp, Defragmenting
>> etc. Good maintenance does NOT include using a Registry Cleaner or
>> installing optimisers etc.
> MY PC is regularly cleaned up, defragged,
> BTW, what has the Tune Up utilities 2009 have to do with that?
> When they just optimize your pc performance?
>
>> You can only really make sure that the computer works efficiently to
>> achieve the optimum performance of the available computer
>> hardware.This can be improved where for example the limited quantity
>> of available RAM is a bottleneck.
>
> Well mine with full RAM capacity shows bottleneck if compared to the
> inferior pc of my workplace….
>>
>> Make sure there are no unnecessary errors and warnings in Event
>> Viewer.
>
> Well I can’t check that out as I can access Event viewer as its not in
> my administrative tools but only the Microsoft Net framework 2
> shortcut.
>
> Any ideas how to put Event viewer in my PC? Thanks >

On Apr 23, 12:53*am, "Gerry" <ge...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Roy
>
> Tune up utilities *2009 falls into the category of software many in these
> newsgroups would not recommend. They offer dubious benefits. I would not use
> Tune up utilities *2009. Not having used the software I cannot say what
> affect it would have on system performance.
>
> HOW TO: View and Manage Event Logs in Event Viewer in Windows XPhttp://support.microsoft.com/kb/308427/en-us
>
> Also you can access Event Viewer by selecting Start, Run, type "eventvwr.msc
> /s" without the quotes and hit ENTER.
>
> --
>
> Hope *this helps.
>
> Gerry
> *~~~~
> FCA
> Stourport, England
> Enquire, plan and execute
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> Roy wrote:
> > BTW does the tune up tools ( like tune up utilities *2009slow down the
> > PC)?
> > Regarding the event viewer I can’t access as it’s not found in my
> > administrative tools but only the short cut for the netframework 2.
> > Mind if you tell me how to *put that event viewer there?
>
> > On Apr 21, 6:49 pm, "Gerry" <ge...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> Roy
>
> >> What are the competing hardware specifications -CPU capacity, RAM
> >> etc?
> > RAM, CPU type?
> > *Does *not make sense to me as the workplace Pc is just Celeron type
> > with *DDR 256Ram my PC is Pentium M 780 2.26ghz, with 2 gig DDR2 ram ..
> > therefore hardware configuration is out of the question… the work
> > place pc boots up faster than mine.
>
> >> What software is scheduled to load when booting? Is there software
> >> loading which does need to load on booting?
> > Software, Adobe Gamma, Adobe reader,Internet Explorer, Microsoft
> > Outlook, Orbit downloader, Statease Design Expert.
> > Work Pc *software loading, almost the same…
>
> >> How well is the computer maintained? Disk CleanUp, Defragmenting
> >> etc. Good maintenance does NOT include using a Registry Cleaner or
> >> installing optimisers etc.
> > MY PC is regularly cleaned up, defragged,
> > BTW, what has the Tune Up utilities 2009 have to do with that?
> > *When they just optimize your pc performance?
>
> >> You can only really make sure that the computer works efficiently to
> >> achieve the optimum performance of the available computer
> >> hardware.This can be improved where for example the limited quantity
> >> of available RAM is a bottleneck.
>
> > Well mine with full RAM capacity shows bottleneck if compared to the
> > inferior pc of my workplace….
>
> >> Make sure there are no unnecessary errors and warnings in Event
> >> Viewer.
>
> > Well I can’t check that out as I can access Event viewer as its not in
> > my administrative tools but only the Microsoft Net framework 2
> > shortcut.
>
> > Any ideas how to put Event viewer in my PC? Thanks >- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Gerry,
In the past I was told about the same way but when I experienced using
their latest version the 2009 it changed my perspective about this
tool, as its totally unlike any other systems tools that I have used.
To tell you those two pc in my workplace which I used for bench mark
are also using the Tune up2009 and it really sure improved the pc's
performance.
I am also against using it at first by seeing how this utility it
does it stuff really changed my perspective and installed it in my pc
also.
Its is a comprehensive PC optimization tool, much better than
competition that I have tested in the past.

Therefore I can't attribute this problem Tune up utilities 2009.
There is only one culprit of my problem , that bungled Sp3 upgrade
installation and that is what I want to sort out.