PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Dual Core vs Dual CPU - Which One?

 
 
art@chicagorsvp.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Jun 2006

Hi All,

I need to build 2 machines. One will be a web server running Apache,
and the other will be a mail server running Postfix. I'll be running
Red Hat.

I have a T1, but what I am wondering about is the speed of the machine
itself to deal with all the processing of emails and such....... the
system does in excess of 50,000 emails per day.

Anyhow, which is better for this kind of job, a dual core processor, or
a motherboard with 2 CPU's?? I would also assume memory is a big
factor??

Thanks!

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
aryzhov@spasu.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jun 2006
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to build 2 machines. One will be a web server running Apache,
> and the other will be a mail server running Postfix. I'll be running
> Red Hat.
>
> I have a T1, but what I am wondering about is the speed of the machine
> itself to deal with all the processing of emails and such....... the
> system does in excess of 50,000 emails per day.
>
> Anyhow, which is better for this kind of job, a dual core processor, or
> a motherboard with 2 CPU's?? I would also assume memory is a big
> factor??


I recently looked at newest multi-CPU Mboards, and could not find any
as modern as dual-core-single-CPU ones - front bus speeds are still
at 2-years-old level, built-in SCSI is UW160, not UW320, none of them
even offers onboard 1.5 GB/s SATA.
Whereas latest boards with a single AM2 socket must be much faster with

2GB/s access to memory and up to 6 onboard SATA-II 3GB/s channels.

If multitasking really becomes a concern, I'd suggest to look at
8-core SPARC-based machines (entry box starts at $3.5K).
You'll probably look at $4.5K for a reasonable configuration,
but then a single box will most likely be able to handle the load of
BOTH
your services. You can run them in separate containers (virtual hosts).

Porting Apache and Postfix content to SPARC/Solaris must be trivial.
Not sure if Fedora runs on 8-core SPARCs yet, but for sure it will
soon.
My choise would be Solaris, anyway.
Whereas Intel and AMD would certainly win on single-thread crunching,
SPARC is much better in context switching.
I have no association with Sun, being just a happy customer,
and I have no intetnion to start a flame here.

Regards,
Andrei

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
art@chicagorsvp.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jun 2006

(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I need to build 2 machines. One will be a web server running Apache,
> > and the other will be a mail server running Postfix. I'll be running
> > Red Hat.
> >
> > I have a T1, but what I am wondering about is the speed of the machine
> > itself to deal with all the processing of emails and such....... the
> > system does in excess of 50,000 emails per day.
> >
> > Anyhow, which is better for this kind of job, a dual core processor, or
> > a motherboard with 2 CPU's?? I would also assume memory is a big
> > factor??

>
> I recently looked at newest multi-CPU Mboards, and could not find any
> as modern as dual-core-single-CPU ones - front bus speeds are still
> at 2-years-old level, built-in SCSI is UW160, not UW320, none of them
> even offers onboard 1.5 GB/s SATA.
> Whereas latest boards with a single AM2 socket must be much faster with
>
> 2GB/s access to memory and up to 6 onboard SATA-II 3GB/s channels.
>
> If multitasking really becomes a concern, I'd suggest to look at
> 8-core SPARC-based machines (entry box starts at $3.5K).
> You'll probably look at $4.5K for a reasonable configuration,
> but then a single box will most likely be able to handle the load of
> BOTH
> your services. You can run them in separate containers (virtual hosts).
>
> Porting Apache and Postfix content to SPARC/Solaris must be trivial.
> Not sure if Fedora runs on 8-core SPARCs yet, but for sure it will
> soon.
> My choise would be Solaris, anyway.
> Whereas Intel and AMD would certainly win on single-thread crunching,
> SPARC is much better in context switching.
> I have no association with Sun, being just a happy customer,
> and I have no intetnion to start a flame here.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei



Well, I'm not looking to spend $4K. I can be satisfied with a couple
of Asus motherboards, and either dual core or dual CPU, not sure which.
And I'm sure at least 1GB memory........

Right now the machines are 800mhx, 512RAM.......

 
Reply With Quote
 
art@chicagorsvp.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Jun 2006

(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I need to build 2 machines. One will be a web server running Apache,
> > and the other will be a mail server running Postfix. I'll be running
> > Red Hat.
> >
> > I have a T1, but what I am wondering about is the speed of the machine
> > itself to deal with all the processing of emails and such....... the
> > system does in excess of 50,000 emails per day.
> >
> > Anyhow, which is better for this kind of job, a dual core processor, or
> > a motherboard with 2 CPU's?? I would also assume memory is a big
> > factor??

>
> I recently looked at newest multi-CPU Mboards, and could not find any
> as modern as dual-core-single-CPU ones - front bus speeds are still
> at 2-years-old level, built-in SCSI is UW160, not UW320, none of them
> even offers onboard 1.5 GB/s SATA.
> Whereas latest boards with a single AM2 socket must be much faster with
>
> 2GB/s access to memory and up to 6 onboard SATA-II 3GB/s channels.
>
> If multitasking really becomes a concern, I'd suggest to look at
> 8-core SPARC-based machines (entry box starts at $3.5K).
> You'll probably look at $4.5K for a reasonable configuration,
> but then a single box will most likely be able to handle the load of
> BOTH
> your services. You can run them in separate containers (virtual hosts).
>
> Porting Apache and Postfix content to SPARC/Solaris must be trivial.
> Not sure if Fedora runs on 8-core SPARCs yet, but for sure it will
> soon.
> My choise would be Solaris, anyway.
> Whereas Intel and AMD would certainly win on single-thread crunching,
> SPARC is much better in context switching.
> I have no association with Sun, being just a happy customer,
> and I have no intetnion to start a flame here.
>
> Regards,
> Andrei



Well, I'm not looking to spend $4K. I can be satisfied with a couple
of Asus motherboards, and either dual core or dual CPU, not sure which.
And I'm sure at least 1GB memory........

Right now the machines are 800mhx, 512RAM.......

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 Brian Cryer ATI Video Cards 4 16th Jan 2008 11:23 PM
Re: Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 John Weiss ATI Video Cards 6 4th Jan 2008 10:09 AM
Re: Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 Patrick Vervoorn ATI Video Cards 1 3rd Jan 2008 10:10 PM
Re: Should I go Dual Core or Quad Core? Intel C2 DUO E6850 vs. Quad-Core Q6600 John Weiss ATI Video Cards 0 3rd Jan 2008 09:54 PM
Which Notebook to buy? Intel Centrino, Core DUO, Core Duo 2, AMD Turion, Single Core pattyjamas@hotmail.com Computer Hardware 4 31st Aug 2006 02:11 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 PM.