PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Dual core Opteron vs dual core Athlon

 
 
Old Guy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10th Mar 2007

Greetings,

I'm currently running an Athlon 4200 X2 o/c'ed to 2.6ghz. No voltage
change from stock.

I would like to get as much out of the system to extend its life as much
as possible. I just upgraded my wife's computer with an Opteron 170
2.0ghz processor from a 3700 San Diego. Big difference and it seems
faster than my system without being overclocked.

Hard drive is already there (Raptor 150). 2gig CAS2 memory. 7600GT
video board.

I like a very responsive system, but I'm not a gamer. I've been thinking
of upgrading to a more robust / faster processor. An Opty 175 is a
possibility.

Would there be a difference in performance between the 4200 X2 and an
Opteron 175?

TIA

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Wes Newell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10th Mar 2007
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:49:57 -0600, Old Guy wrote:

> Would there be a difference in performance between the 4200 X2 and an
> Opteron 175?


Yes. The 175 has 1MB l2 cache while the X2 4200+ only has 512K per core.
The X2 4400+ is the same as the 175. But to be honest, they all run at
2.2GHz, so it would really depend on the apps you run and if they would
take advantage of the larger caches. if not, then they'd all run about the
same speed. Actually the one with the smaller cache would be slightly
faster due to a little more overhead of the 1MB caches of the 175/4400+.

--
Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
http://mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html Usenet alt.video.ptv.mythtv
My server http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
HD Tivo S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Guest
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Mar 2007

"Wes Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:cjrIh.455$8u4.87@trnddc08...
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:49:57 -0600, Old Guy wrote:
>
>> Would there be a difference in performance between the 4200 X2 and an
>> Opteron 175?

>
> Yes. The 175 has 1MB l2 cache while the X2 4200+ only has 512K per core.
> The X2 4400+ is the same as the 175. But to be honest, they all run at
> 2.2GHz, so it would really depend on the apps you run and if they would
> take advantage of the larger caches. if not, then they'd all run about the
> same speed. Actually the one with the smaller cache would be slightly
> faster due to a little more overhead of the 1MB caches of the 175/4400+.
>
> --
> Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org
> http://mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html Usenet alt.video.ptv.mythtv
> My server http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php
> HD Tivo S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm
>


Well, I just upgraded from an X2 2.2ghz(forget the 4400+?) to an Opteron
1212. Sam 2ghz RAM, but the Opteron runs a lot faster than the 2,2ghz! Now
it could be and probably is the memory being faster, but I like the
improvement. The only reason I upgraded is to allow for CPU upgrades in the
AM2 set.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual opteron dual core cpu..only one recognised Rock Windows Vista General Discussion 1 7th Feb 2007 06:39 AM
Dual core: Core 2 Duo vs. Athlon 64 X2? Cyde Weys Computer Hardware 12 12th Jan 2007 01:35 AM
Seeking CPU recommendation: Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Athlon 64 x2 4800 dual core DJ AMD 64 Bit 8 6th Dec 2005 09:31 PM
Quad Opteron and Octal Opteron and Windows XP =?Utf-8?B?YXBlc29jY2Vy?= Windows XP Hardware 6 13th Nov 2005 01:38 PM
Athlon 64 FX or Dual Opteron? Xenophon Processors 24 2nd Apr 2004 01:20 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.