"xrrr" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Nmapb.979$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I disagree - seems loads of people have problems with Cat3.8. See the
"Call
> of Duty" thread from yesterday.
>
> The Det52 drivers are all over the shop. I had a GeForceFX for 3 weeks
> (came free with a new PC), the driver bugs and shoddy performance made me
go
> out and buy a Radeon again!
>
> Seems that there is no site out there yet!
Sorry, I wasn't referring to general problems with the Cat 3.8 drivers,
xrrr, when you talked about "safest drivers" I thought you were referring to
the apparently bogus monitor burnout problem. But I have to say, I'm having
no problems with them at all; in fact they seem excellent.
patrickp
>
> "patrickp" <(E-Mail Removed) - take five to email me> wrote in
> message news:7ETnb.3791$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > "Xrrr" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:bnoflb$rv2$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Given the grief over Catalyst 3.8 and Detonator 52 is there anywhere
on
> > > t'internet that gives a "whats the safest drivers to use for my card".
> > >
> > > e.g. Radeon 9700 Pro - Cat3.7 (few problems)
> > > Cat3.8 (mega problems reported)
> > >
> > >
> > Given that the reported grief with the Cat 3.8 driver appears to be
> entirely
> > spurious (I can't say for the Detonator drivers) it would seem this is
not
> > yet an appropriate topic for this ng.
> >
> > patrickp
> >
> >
>
>
|
Similar Threads
