Lesley Anne <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks, Rod...
> I doubted I'd be able to selectively image the
> OS & Program Files but I wanted to be sure.
Yeah, you do sometimes see a situation where it doesnt
look like its possible, but it turns out that there is an easy way.
> I do want to emphasize that what I want to do is 'image' not
> 'backup' - I've already backed up (multiple times) my important
> data files (including bookmarks & email, etc). What I want is to
> have a quick way to restore my system in case of disaster without
> the arduous task of reinstalling Windows and all my programs.
Sure. But a decent backup program can do
that, without needing to produce an image.
> If I just copy the Windows & Program Files folders to
> my second hard drive, reformat the C drive, then copy
> back the two folders containing the OS & Programs,
> it's my understanding that this will not work, right?
The better backup progs will do that. They usually
call that disaster recovery or something close to that.
> But an image containing the OS & Program Files
> (+everything else on C: except the data files) will?
Yes.
> The reason I don't want to just image C: as it exists
> now with nearly all 20GB full is that I'd like to put an
> image on cdr's. Even if the process compresses the
> image down to 10GB or so, that's still a lot of cd's.
Yes.
> By temporarily deleting all the data off C:
> and just imaging the OS & programs, then it's
> reduced to less than 2GB and a couple of cd's.
Yes, and if you have a separate partition for the OS and programs,
and just image that, you dont even need to do the copying.
> Copying all the mp3's, etc back to C: (from the second hard drive)
> after imaging will take a bit of time but nowhere near that needed
> to swap in and out a dozen or more cdr's on my old 4X burner!
True. Thats why I now have a separate partition
for the OS and programs and just image that.
I mostly do that in case a service pack install
goes pear shaped, and I write the image to
another physical drive, so the number of CDs
isnt relevant, its just quicker to image just the
OS and programs which increases the likelyhood
that I'll bother before installing a critical update etc.
> Rod Speed <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>> lesley anne <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
> >> Is there a drive imaging program that will let me image ONLY the
> >> C:\Windows & the C:\Program Files folders to allow for a quick restore
> >> of just the operating system (win98se) and my current programs?
> >
> >Nope, the word image means the entire partition or drive.
> >
> >Any decent full backup program will do what you want tho.
> >
> >Or you could repartition the drive so you have
> >one small boot partition when that stuff in it and
> >the rest of the stuff in a separate data partition.
> >
> >> My C: drive is 20GB but 16+GB are mp3 & other data files that
> >> are already backed up to my second hard drive (& to cd-r's) so
> >> there is no need to take all the time and space to image them.
> >
> >Correct.
> >
> >> Windows is taking up just under 700MB & Program Files is using
> >> 1GB so an image that just had those two critical folders to get me
> >> back up & running in case of a disaster would be quick & easy.
> >
> >Correct.
> >
> >> So can I selectively chose which folders to
> >> image using Ghost, Drive Image, BootitNg
> >
> >Nope.
> >
> >> or another program?
> >
> >Yes, any of the full backup programs will do what you want,
> >allow you to specify what gets backed up and what doesnt.
> >
> >> If not, I see a several alternatives:
> >
> >> 1) delete the data files temporarily and image
> >> the smaller C: then copy the data back.
> >
> >Thats not likely to be any faster than imaging the whole thing.
> >
> >> 2) partition C: and move non-OS/program files to a new partition.
> >
> >Yep, that will certainly work fine.
> >
> >> I'd rather not do this if avoidable.
> >
> >You'd really need to image the entire drive first
> >for safety, but its a very viable approach if you
> >want to keep using Ghost or Drive Image.
> >
> >> I don't need to do frequent images, just one that is
> >> dependable now and an occasional new one in the future.
> >
> >Maybe. What does keep changing quite a bit is stuff like favourites
> >and even just the email if you keep that in the default location.
> >
> >It would probably best to just use a real backup
> >program and no an imaging app. Thats built in with XP.
> >
>