PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Does Acronis True Image Home 2011 stores some recovery records ?

 
 
Castor Nageur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
Hi all,

I am actually trying Acronis TIH 2011.

* But because a backup is a very sensible file, do you know if TIH
stores some recovery records like WinRAR does or like you can do
externally with QuickPAR?

Thanks to these records, you can recover a corrupted archive.
I searched in the Acronis manuals and in the software settings but did
not find anything like this.

Thanks in advance if you can provide some more information.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Arno
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
Castor Nageur <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hi all,


> I am actually trying Acronis TIH 2011.


> * But because a backup is a very sensible file, do you know if TIH
> stores some recovery records like WinRAR does or like you can do
> externally with QuickPAR?


> Thanks to these records, you can recover a corrupted archive.
> I searched in the Acronis manuals and in the software settings but did
> not find anything like this.


> Thanks in advance if you can provide some more information.


What is the issue? If you are concerned your backup can be
accesses by people that shopuld not, you shpuld not put
any plaintext data in there in the first place. One apporahc
is to use an encrypted container and back it up in encrypted
form. Look for example at the free and excellent Truecrypt
for that.

Arno
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: (E-Mail Removed)
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Castor Nageur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
On 21 fév, 16:02, Arno <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> What is the issue? If you are concerned your backup can be
> accesses by people that shopuld not


No I am not concerned by other people accesses my backup (anyway,
Acronis already has an encryption option for this), I was asking if a
corrupted archive can be recovered using redundancy bits (stored in
recovery records).
Corruption already happened to me when sectors of my hard disk became
unreadable because of a mechanical problem.
Of course I changed my hard disk and thanks to the recovery records
stored in my RAR files, I was able to rebuild my RAR files which had
some data stored in the unreadable sectors.

I was just asking if Acronis True Image Home 2011 was implementing
such a feature or not ?

 
Reply With Quote
 
Arno
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
Castor Nageur <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On 21 f?v, 16:02, Arno <m...@privacy.net> wrote:


>> What is the issue? If you are concerned your backup can be
>> accesses by people that shopuld not


> No I am not concerned by other people accesses my backup (anyway,
> Acronis already has an encryption option for this), I was asking if a
> corrupted archive can be recovered using redundancy bits (stored in
> recovery records).
> Corruption already happened to me when sectors of my hard disk became
> unreadable because of a mechanical problem.
> Of course I changed my hard disk and thanks to the recovery records
> stored in my RAR files, I was able to rebuild my RAR files which had
> some data stored in the unreadable sectors.


> I was just asking if Acronis True Image Home 2011 was implementing
> such a feature or not ?


No idea. But keep in mind that error correction coding allways
has hard limits on what it can do.

Arno
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: (E-Mail Removed)
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rod Speed
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
Castor Nageur wrote
> Arno <m...@privacy.net> wrote


>> What is the issue? If you are concerned your backup
>> can be accesses by people that shopuld not


> No I am not concerned by other people accesses my backup (anyway,
> Acronis already has an encryption option for this), I was asking if a
> corrupted archive can be recovered using redundancy bits (stored in
> recovery records).


> Corruption already happened to me when sectors of my hard
> disk became unreadable because of a mechanical problem.


Sounds like you backed up to the same physical drive.

Thats a very unsatisfactory way to do backups.

> Of course I changed my hard disk and thanks to the recovery
> records stored in my RAR files, I was able to rebuild my RAR
> files which had some data stored in the unreadable sectors.


> I was just asking if Acronis True Image Home 2011
> was implementing such a feature or not ?


The obvious alternative is more than one backup to more than one physical drive.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Castor Nageur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
On 21 fév, 20:21, Arno <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> No idea. But keep in mind that error correction coding allways
> has hard limits on what it can do.


QuickPAR can recover up to 10% of any piece of data located anywhere
of your corrupted file.
Imagine, you saved an archive on a DVD, forgot it and stored it in bad
conditions.
If you retrieve it damaged years later, you will still be able to
recover your data (if no more than 10% of your data was damaged).

Obviously, I can not imagine generating some QuickPAR redundancy files
on my 100 GB Acronis backups because it would take an entire day. The
idea was Acronis could do it on the fly (like WinRAR does) but I do
not think it does it.



 
Reply With Quote
 
DevilsPGD
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      21st Feb 2011
In message
<0ce5fa3e-a630-4620-9c96-(E-Mail Removed)>
someone claiming to be Castor Nageur <(E-Mail Removed)> typed:

>On 21 fév, 20:21, Arno <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> No idea. But keep in mind that error correction coding allways
>> has hard limits on what it can do.

>
>QuickPAR can recover up to 10% of any piece of data located anywhere
>of your corrupted file.


10% isn't a hard number either, you can recover up to whatever
percentage of data you want based on the amount of PAR2 blocks you
created in the first place.

Nothing stops you from creating 100% PAR2 blocks and throwing away the
entire original media.

Also, even if you set the threshold at 10%, you can't necessarily throw
away 10% of the original media. You can throw away or damage 10% of the
blocks of the original media, but you couldn't damage 10% of every block
and recover.

This difference is mostly academic since damage will often be grouped
together, but it's worth considering if your fear is long-term bitrot.

>Imagine, you saved an archive on a DVD, forgot it and stored it in bad
>conditions.
>If you retrieve it damaged years later, you will still be able to
>recover your data (if no more than 10% of your data was damaged).
>
>Obviously, I can not imagine generating some QuickPAR redundancy files
>on my 100 GB Acronis backups because it would take an entire day. The
>idea was Acronis could do it on the fly (like WinRAR does) but I do
>not think it does it.


I'm not sure why your imagination precludes letting a computer run for
several hours at once, but it's entirely possible, it just takes a
while.

QuickPAR takes a long time because the math is complex (it's CPU-bound),
and the fact that it runs after the fact vs during the original backup
wouldn't make much difference in terms of the total runtime. There are
other algorithms that might be more efficient on CPU resources, but few
that offer the redundancy that PAR2 does.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Tomlinson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Feb 2011
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Arno <(E-Mail Removed)>
writes

>What is the issue?


I think he's concerned that a TrueImage archive may become inaccessible
if it becomes damaged, and is asking if tools exist to extract files
from a damaged or corrupted TI archive.

This is one of the problems with backup and proprietary image/archive
files. I use a utility (QuickShadow) which stores backup files
normally, i.e. they're accessible without QuickShadow installed.

--
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Tomlinson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Feb 2011
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, Mark F
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes

>The program seems to only backup file files. In particular
>Windows Registry and the information that the restored file has
>to be in a particular location is not retained. Thus, one would
>still need at least an image backup program to be able to restore
>a Windows system


Yes. QuickShadow is produced with simplicity in mind. As you say, it's
a file backup utility, not a system imager. Once nice feature is that
it monitors file changes and additions and backs these up almost as soon
as they are created or modified.

It does what I want - hassle-free backup to a NAS in another location
over the LAN. Anyone posting here will know that once backup becomes a
chore, it doesn't get done.

I emailed the author with a couple of suggestions and had a positive
reply. As soon as he releases a version that implements those features
I'll be registering and paying for my copy.

--
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")


 
Reply With Quote
 
Castor Nageur
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Feb 2011
"Rod Speed" <(E-Mail Removed)> écrivait
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> Sounds like you backed up to the same physical drive.


No I did not. I used to storing my RAR archives (I was using WinRAR before
Acronis) on a different disk. The archive disk had a mechanical problem so
some sectors became unaccessible so my archives were corrupted.
I was not using WinRAR or QuickPAR recovery records at this time so I was
unable to restore my archive.
Fortunately, my original files were OK !

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Acronis True Image vs. SyncToy + 50 questions about Acronis and SSD drives :-) RJK Windows XP General 3 29th Aug 2012 06:27 AM
Acronis True Image recovery of Vista Image mrh981 Windows Vista General Discussion 1 2nd Jul 2008 03:57 AM
SWsoft Acronis Disk Director Suite 9.0 Build 508, Acronis OS Selector 8.0 Build 917, Acronis Partition Expert 2003 Build 292, Acronis Power Utilities 2004 Build 502, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS.PROXY v1.10.17.WINALL, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS v5.50.10260 for CITRI vvcd Storage Devices 2 4th Dec 2005 12:46 PM
SWsoft Acronis Disk Director Suite 9.0 Build 508, Acronis OS Selector 8.0 Build 917, Acronis Partition Expert 2003 Build 292, Acronis Power Utilities 2004 Build 502, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS.PROXY v1.10.17.WINALL, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS v5.50.10260 for CITRI code_fu Anti-Virus 2 2nd Oct 2004 09:32 AM
SWsoft Acronis Disk Director Suite 9.0 Build 508, Acronis OS Selector 8.0 Build 917, Acronis Partition Expert 2003 Build 292, Acronis Power Utilities 2004 Build 502, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS.PROXY v1.10.17.WINALL, F-SECURE.ANTI vIRUS v5.50.10260 for CITRI code_fu Windows XP Basics 0 2nd Oct 2004 05:11 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:03 PM.