Jack (MVP-Networking). wrote:
> Just as a notion.
> All of this VPN or otherwise, would pending on having two
> independent Internet accounts (might be very costly way to share
> two LAN computers). Clear this issue before you continue with any
> thing else.
Don J wrote:
> Maybe VPN is not a good idea! A description of my problem which
> someone suggested could be solved through VPN is as follows:
<snipped - as it is listed below as original thread>
GHalleck wrote:
> Just tossing out an idea because it seems so simple for a situation
> like this...why not go wireless and a local intranet?
This is why I have no clue as to the reason for starting another post - it
has done nothing but complicate matters.
See the response I already gave in the original thread this must have
formed from...
http://groups.google.com/group/micro...6e81186d824176
Server:
http://www.onecomputerguy.com/networ...vpn_server.htm
Client:
http://www.onecomputerguy.com/networking/xp_vpn.htm
You could setup a Dynamic DNS account with someone like DynDNS.com and an
update client on one or both machines so that you only have to remember some
simplistic name instead of having to worry about getting the new IP
everytime the 'hotel-like institution' gives the machine a new address. ;-)
So - either we are missing some information here (is it a 'hotel-like
institution' where each room is somehow separated from all other system
(firewalled) or something else? What exactly *is* what you are trying to
do? How do you get your IP? Will you be paying for each connection in each
'room' in this 'hotel-like institution' individually?
Please give as much detail about your situation as possible.
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html