Thanks..
Submitted using http://www.outlookforums.com

You can't since POP3 doesn't support this. Use IMAP instead (if supported)
or move the contents from the additional folders on-line to your Inbox
folder so it can be downloaded via POP3.

--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more

http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers

-----

"aaa" <kamikaza1[at]gmail[dot]com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks.. Submitted using http://www.outlookforums.com

newsgroups_DELETE_ wrote on Sat, 19 December 2009 07:32
> You can't since POP3 doesn't support this. Use IMAP instead (if supported)
> or move the contents from the additional folders on-line to your Inbox
> folder so it can be downloaded via POP3.
>
> --
> Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
> Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
> http://www.howto-outlook.com/
> Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
>
> http://www.msoutlook.info/
> Real World Questions, Real World Answers
>
> -----
>
> "aaa" <kamikaza1[at]gmail[dot]com> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Thanks.. Submitted using http://www.outlookforums.com


Thank you for your quick response.
Hmmm well i got another problem you might solve..
Im using yahoo with pop3.
when i receive messages they are being marked as read.
The account used by several workers. so I want them to stay unread.
Is it possible?

Submitted using http://www.outlookforums.com

aaa wrote:

> Im using yahoo with pop3.
> when i receive messages they are being marked as read.
> The account used by several workers.

You use Yahoo mail for a BUSINESS?

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:35:23 +0000
Gordon Gordon <(E-Mail Removed)> articulated:

> aaa wrote:
>
> > Im using yahoo with pop3.
> > when i receive messages they are being marked as read.
> > The account used by several workers.
>
> You use Yahoo mail for a BUSINESS?

Pathetic as it is, there are small firms using the commercial version
of GMail for businesses as well. It really amazes me since the cost of
setting up a mail server is negligible. The only real cost is in
obtaining a static IP from you ISP.

--
Carmel

|::::=======
|::::=======
|===========
|===========
|

What!? Me worry?

A. E. Neuman

Well, truthfully there is more cost than just the static ip - running a mail
server in the office is beyond the scope of many users - they need it
configured, the mail backed up etc - that can get expensive.

Sites such as godaddy sell domains for under $10 a year that include free
email and other email plans for less than the cost of a static IP. Plus I
thought both yahoo and gmail support using your own domain name for their
paid accounts.


--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com/

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-(E-Mail Removed)

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-(E-Mail Removed)

Poll: What version of Outlook do you use?
http://forums.slipstick.com/showthread.php?t=27072


"Carmel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:35:23 +0000
> Gordon Gordon <(E-Mail Removed)> articulated:
>
>> aaa wrote:
>>
>> > Im using yahoo with pop3.
>> > when i receive messages they are being marked as read.
>> > The account used by several workers.
>>
>> You use Yahoo mail for a BUSINESS?
>
> Pathetic as it is, there are small firms using the commercial version
> of GMail for businesses as well. It really amazes me since the cost of
> setting up a mail server is negligible. The only real cost is in
> obtaining a static IP from you ISP.
>
> --
> Carmel
>
> |::::=======
> |::::=======
> |===========
> |===========
> |
>
> What!? Me worry?
>
> A. E. Neuman
>
>

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:55:11 -0500
Diane Poremsky [MVP] <(E-Mail Removed)> articulated:

> Well, truthfully there is more cost than just the static ip - running
> a mail server in the office is beyond the scope of many users - they
> need it configured, the mail backed up etc - that can get expensive.

I run a Postfix/Dovecot mail system on an old Gateway GT5160LE PC. It
could easily service a medium office with no problems. If I were to
invest in a more powerful server & memory, the field would be virtually
unlimited. As it now stands, it services a small office flawlessly,
offering complete SPAM/AV controls via "amavisd-new". Mail backup is
handled via 'rsync' run via a CRON job. Anyone could set up a similar
system.

The advantage, other than e-mail, for a static IP is that the user
(company) can more easily run its own Web-Server, which would allow
them total control over its operation. I will agree that running a
Web-Server might be a slight daunting experience for many users;
however, it the user is willing to invest the time, it is a skill well
worth learning. In addition, running your own FTP (seriously
depreciated) server, or a modern 'rsync' server might prove to be a
valuable asset to the firm.


--
Carmel

|::::=======
|::::=======
|===========
|===========
|

For adult education nothing beats children.

aaa wrote:
<snip - removed duplicated post>

Also see replies to your SAME post submitted all of 4 minutes earlier in a
SEPARATE thread titled simply "yahoo pop".

A company using yahoo addresses for mail generally has little interest
learning how to run their own mail and web server - and frankly, its not
necessary. There are plenty of hosting companies that offer affordable
domain mail hosting, leaving the company to focus on their business, not
tinkering with technology. All they need to do is buy a domain name and
pick a hosting company. Cost will be as little as $60/yr and they won't need
to learn how to configure and secure the mail and web servers.


--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com/

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-(E-Mail Removed)

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-(E-Mail Removed)

Poll: What version of Outlook do you use?
http://forums.slipstick.com/showthread.php?t=27072


"Carmel" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:55:11 -0500
> Diane Poremsky [MVP] <(E-Mail Removed)> articulated:
>
>> Well, truthfully there is more cost than just the static ip - running
>> a mail server in the office is beyond the scope of many users - they
>> need it configured, the mail backed up etc - that can get expensive.
>
> I run a Postfix/Dovecot mail system on an old Gateway GT5160LE PC. It
> could easily service a medium office with no problems. If I were to
> invest in a more powerful server & memory, the field would be virtually
> unlimited. As it now stands, it services a small office flawlessly,
> offering complete SPAM/AV controls via "amavisd-new". Mail backup is
> handled via 'rsync' run via a CRON job. Anyone could set up a similar
> system.
>
> The advantage, other than e-mail, for a static IP is that the user
> (company) can more easily run its own Web-Server, which would allow
> them total control over its operation. I will agree that running a
> Web-Server might be a slight daunting experience for many users;
> however, it the user is willing to invest the time, it is a skill well
> worth learning. In addition, running your own FTP (seriously
> depreciated) server, or a modern 'rsync' server might prove to be a
> valuable asset to the firm.
>
>
> --
> Carmel
>
> |::::=======
> |::::=======
> |===========
> |===========
> |
>
> For adult education nothing beats children.
>
>

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:54:58 -0500
Diane Poremsky [MVP] <(E-Mail Removed)> articulated:

> A company using yahoo addresses for mail generally has little
> interest learning how to run their own mail and web server - and
> frankly, its not necessary. There are plenty of hosting companies
> that offer affordable domain mail hosting, leaving the company to
> focus on their business, not tinkering with technology. All they
> need to do is buy a domain name and pick a hosting company. Cost will
> be as little as $60/yr and they won't need to learn how to configure
> and secure the mail and web servers.

I believe that Sturgeon's revelation can be applied to a very large
segment of the 'Hosting community'. Unfortunately, all too many users
fail to "RTFM" or "STW" and consequently are incapable of doing
anything other than out sourcing simple projects. In the end, it costs
far more than you might think.

--
Carmel

|::::=======
|::::=======
|===========
|===========
|

After I run your program, let's make love like crazed weasels, OK?