I used to have a collection of links to documents found on the web that
contained tracked changes but I think they've been cleaned up by now. The
government and MS documents were the best. lol
I'm all about the "clicks" too but it only takes once to overlook something
and it's usually in a document someone else created. :-)
When I work on documents with tracked changes I add the reviewing commands I
use the most to my Quick Access Toolbar (which is placed below the Ribbon.)
and it makes it much easier. If you don't know how to add commands,
right-click the command and then click "Add to Quick Access Toolbar". You
can also add an entire group, such as the Changes group, by right-clicking
the group name instead of a command in the group. Removal is essentially the
same, right-click the command on the QAT and use the Remove command.
Please post all follow-up questions to the newsgroup. Requests for
assistance by email cannot be acknowledged.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton
Microsoft Office MVP
Coauthor of Word 2007 Inside Out:
http://www.microsoft.com/MSPress/boo...x#AboutTheBook
Word FAQ:
http://mvps.org/word
TechTrax eZine:
http://mousetrax.com/techtrax/
MVP FAQ site:
http://mvps.org/
"Kenneth D. Forbus" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message news

A709FEB-E452-4344-9737-(E-Mail Removed)...
>I know what you mean re the amusement (or horror) of seeing what other
>people
> have done in their drafts. Not to mention the proceedings of a conference
> that shall remain nameless which insistent on editable RTF files, and made
> the PDF for the proceedings after editing them with change tracking on,
> and
> "printing" them in Final with Markup mode. Ugh.
>
> But, on the other hand, a couple of clicks adds up quickly. So far, I'm
> undecided on whether the ribbon bar in 2007 is an improvement or a setback
> in
> terms of my efficiency, since I'm finding myself going back and forth a
> lot
> more now. I personally find it a lot easier to treat the publishing of
> something as a distinct and explicit act, where one scrubs all tracked
> changes anyway.
>
> "Beth Melton" wrote:
>
>> Interesting article title. I'm not sure if I would consider a security
>> option "annoying". Personally, I don't mind the two or three "clicks" it
>> takes to change the Markup View -- a couple clicks are worth the risk of
>> sending out something that could be embarrassing. Not to mention it's
>> always
>> fun to encounter a document that someone unknowingly sent or published on
>> the web with tracked changes and the best way to find them is to make
>> sure
>> you can see them when the document opens. ;-)
>> "margilowry" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:F658930D-08B6-4B35-B165-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > I'm not really sure if this will help you but I found it through a
>> > Google
>> > search:
>> >
>> > http://www.twoorthree.net/2006/10/ho...urn_off_1.html
>>
>>
>>