PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

How do I get a true calculation?

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?cmVja3lyb28=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th May 2006
Hi. I think I have just posted this question, but I can't find it now, so my
apologies.....
I need to start at number 1 and multiply it by 2 - then multiply that answer
by 2, then multiply that answer by 2 and carry on until I have done that 480
times!!
when I try to do this in excel, I either get the answer 4.72237E+21 (which
means nothing to me) or £4,722,366,482,869,650,000,000.0 which isn't a true
calculation as I have worked it out up to a point, but I dont have enough
spaces on my calculator. Bearing in mind that I have not used excel since I
last worked (about 3 years ago), answers as simple as possible please.
Thanks

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Niek Otten
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th May 2006
So what you require is 2 to the power of 479 or 480?
Your result is 2^408, not 2^480.

--
Kind regards,

Niek Otten


--
Kind regards,

Niek Otten

"reckyroo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:BCB6F46A-D69E-46FA-AD2B-(E-Mail Removed)...
| Hi. I think I have just posted this question, but I can't find it now, so my
| apologies.....
| I need to start at number 1 and multiply it by 2 - then multiply that answer
| by 2, then multiply that answer by 2 and carry on until I have done that 480
| times!!
| when I try to do this in excel, I either get the answer 4.72237E+21 (which
| means nothing to me) or £4,722,366,482,869,650,000,000.0 which isn't a true
| calculation as I have worked it out up to a point, but I dont have enough
| spaces on my calculator. Bearing in mind that I have not used excel since I
| last worked (about 3 years ago), answers as simple as possible please.
| Thanks
|


 
Reply With Quote
 
Niek Otten
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th May 2006
Sorry, little mistake, your result is 2^72.

--
Kind regards,

Niek Otten

"Niek Otten" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
| So what you require is 2 to the power of 479 or 480?
| Your result is 2^408, not 2^480.
|
| --
| Kind regards,
|
| Niek Otten
|
|
| --
| Kind regards,
|
| Niek Otten
|
| "reckyroo" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:BCB6F46A-D69E-46FA-AD2B-(E-Mail Removed)...
|| Hi. I think I have just posted this question, but I can't find it now, so my
|| apologies.....
|| I need to start at number 1 and multiply it by 2 - then multiply that answer
|| by 2, then multiply that answer by 2 and carry on until I have done that 480
|| times!!
|| when I try to do this in excel, I either get the answer 4.72237E+21 (which
|| means nothing to me) or £4,722,366,482,869,650,000,000.0 which isn't a true
|| calculation as I have worked it out up to a point, but I dont have enough
|| spaces on my calculator. Bearing in mind that I have not used excel since I
|| last worked (about 3 years ago), answers as simple as possible please.
|| Thanks
||
|
|


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?am9ldTIwMDRAaG90bWFpbC5jb20=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th May 2006
"reckyroo" wrote:
> I need to start at number 1 and multiply it by 2 - then
> multiply that answer by 2, then multiply that answer by
> 2 and carry on until I have done that 480 times!!


That can be written =2^480 in Excel, which reads "2 to the
power of 480".

> when I try to do this in excel, I either get the answer
> 4.72237E+21 (which means nothing to me)


It means "4.72237 times 10 to the 21" -- that is, 472237
followed by 16 zeros. It is called scientific notation. If you
change the format to Number (Format > Cells > Number >
Number, you will see something closer to what you expect.

But that is 4.72237E+21 2^72, not 2^480. 2^480 is closer
to 3.1217E+144.

> or £4,722,366,482,869,650,000,000.0 which isn't a true
> calculation as I have worked it out up to a point, but I dont
> have enough spaces on my calculator.


And just like your calculator, Excel -- and all computational
devices -- have a limit to the "space" in which they can
represent a number. Some calculators simply give up beyond
that. Excel does its best by showing numbers in scientific
notation, by default. But even if you use the Number format,
only the first 15 non-zero digits are accurate, more or less.
(The 15th digit might be rounded.)

> answers as simple as possible please.


Hope that's simple enough.

And to answer your question ("how do I get a true calculation"),
there are multiprecision arithmetic add-ins that claim to have
more accuracy. I have not personal experience with any of them.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If calculation in text box > 1 hour set check box = True Jmac Microsoft Access Forms 2 23rd Jun 2010 05:20 PM
True/False calculation converted to checkbox? BlueWolverine Microsoft Access Forms 3 8th Dec 2008 07:51 PM
how do I use OR in a way that true return calculation =?Utf-8?B?TlpSTQ==?= Microsoft Excel Worksheet Functions 2 11th Nov 2006 03:37 PM
How do I get a true calculation? =?Utf-8?B?cmVja3lyb28=?= Microsoft Excel New Users 1 7th May 2006 08:20 PM
true/false field calculation =?Utf-8?B?S3lsaWU=?= Microsoft Access Queries 2 19th Dec 2005 12:28 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 PM.