Currently in the monthly calendar view, December, at the upper right I have
two smaller calendars, one being December and the other January 2005. In most
other calendars that I've seen, you would find the month prior, November, and
the month to come, January 2005. I can't seem to find a way to make this
happen. It seems redundant and rather pointless to have a miniature version
of the current month when the month prior and following allow for three
months at-a-glance? Please help.

Drag the separators to show your preferred view.

--�
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.

After furious head scratching, Tom asked:

| Currently in the monthly calendar view, December, at the upper right
| I have two smaller calendars, one being December and the other
| January 2005. In most other calendars that I've seen, you would find
| the month prior, November, and the month to come, January 2005. I
| can't seem to find a way to make this happen. It seems redundant and
| rather pointless to have a miniature version of the current month
| when the month prior and following allow for three months
| at-a-glance? Please help.

Milly, Would be more explicit. This makes no sense to me. This question is
exactly the one I need answered. I would like to print next year's calendar
from outlook, but having the same month twice on a page is not what I'm
looking for.

"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:

> Drag the separators to show your preferred view.
>
> --�
> Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
>
> Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
> the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
> account will be deleted without reading.
>
> After furious head scratching, Tom asked:
>
> | Currently in the monthly calendar view, December, at the upper right
> | I have two smaller calendars, one being December and the other
> | January 2005. In most other calendars that I've seen, you would find
> | the month prior, November, and the month to come, January 2005. I
> | can't seem to find a way to make this happen. It seems redundant and
> | rather pointless to have a miniature version of the current month
> | when the month prior and following allow for three months
> | at-a-glance? Please help.
>
>
>