According the the Seventh Edition of the Turabian Guide, the now-approved
style for footnote numbering is non-superscript, and with a period following
the number. The only suggestion I've found is to delete the number in the
footnote, then re-type the number along with a period. Losing the
auto-numbering capability isn't really something I want, since that seems
that would lead to trouble in moving or re-ordering footnotes. I'm guessing
the answer may lie in tweaking a footnote field, but...

See http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/MacrosVBA/...scptFnotes.htm

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA

"MikeZ_74" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:61778D76-78B0-482F-878F-(E-Mail Removed)...
> According the the Seventh Edition of the Turabian Guide, the now-approved
> style for footnote numbering is non-superscript, and with a period
> following
> the number. The only suggestion I've found is to delete the number in the
> footnote, then re-type the number along with a period. Losing the
> auto-numbering capability isn't really something I want, since that seems
> that would lead to trouble in moving or re-ordering footnotes. I'm
> guessing
> the answer may lie in tweaking a footnote field, but...
>