PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

How do "Big Name" machines respond to generic XP OEM disks?

 
 
axinar@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Dec 2004
Actually, after considerable digging, I've decided I may be going about
this whole project backwards.

Considering some of the staggering price differences between the
various customizable options -- Falcon Northwest, Alienware, Velocity
Micro, IBuyPower, Dell, etc, etc, and the monolithic jobs like Sony,
HP, Gateway, (and the Powerspec which seems to exist in some sort of
bizarre netherworld between a true clone and a monolith) the thought
crosses my mind it might actually be CHEAPER to buy one of the
monolithic machines AND an XP OEM disc (even the full boxed verson in
addition to a monolith is cheaper than some of the configs I have run)
and round up the rest of the hardware drivers from the net.

QUESTION ... obviously there are mechanisms in the restore discs and
the restore partitions of the monoliths to prevent them from being
installed on another machine, but do any of them have any mechanisms to
allow a new full copy of XP to be loaded on THEM?

Thanks!

Ax

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Raymond J. Johnson Jr.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Dec 2004
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> Actually, after considerable digging, I've decided I may be going about
> this whole project backwards.
>
> Considering some of the staggering price differences between the
> various customizable options -- Falcon Northwest, Alienware, Velocity
> Micro, IBuyPower, Dell, etc, etc, and the monolithic jobs like Sony,
> HP, Gateway, (and the Powerspec which seems to exist in some sort of
> bizarre netherworld between a true clone and a monolith) the thought
> crosses my mind it might actually be CHEAPER to buy one of the
> monolithic machines AND an XP OEM disc (even the full boxed verson in
> addition to a monolith is cheaper than some of the configs I have run)
> and round up the rest of the hardware drivers from the net.
>
> QUESTION ... obviously there are mechanisms in the restore discs and
> the restore partitions of the monoliths to prevent them from being
> installed on another machine, but do any of them have any mechanisms to
> allow a new full copy of XP to be loaded on THEM?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ax
>


1) You should look up "monolith" and find out what it means.

2) There's no reason you shouldn't be able to install your own version
of XP, assuming that any special drivers are on a separate disk and not
on the OEM "restore" disk. Even if that's the case, it's usually
possible to download the drivers, if necessary. You should be aware that
installation of an OS not provided by the OEM could void the warranty.
 
Reply With Quote
 
justme
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Dec 2004
Dell, HP, Gateway, Emachine etc all come with the OEM version of XP
installed, why would you want to go through the additional expense of buying
yet another version of XP? True you don't get the OEM XP cd but you have a
way of restoring back to original. I don't see how having the actual cd
would buy you anything.

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
Actually, after considerable digging, I've decided I may be going about
this whole project backwards.

Considering some of the staggering price differences between the
various customizable options -- Falcon Northwest, Alienware, Velocity
Micro, IBuyPower, Dell, etc, etc, and the monolithic jobs like Sony,
HP, Gateway, (and the Powerspec which seems to exist in some sort of
bizarre netherworld between a true clone and a monolith) the thought
crosses my mind it might actually be CHEAPER to buy one of the
monolithic machines AND an XP OEM disc (even the full boxed verson in
addition to a monolith is cheaper than some of the configs I have run)
and round up the rest of the hardware drivers from the net.

QUESTION ... obviously there are mechanisms in the restore discs and
the restore partitions of the monoliths to prevent them from being
installed on another machine, but do any of them have any mechanisms to
allow a new full copy of XP to be loaded on THEM?

Thanks!

Ax


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hall
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Dec 2004
I have a feeling that you are a troll in the making..

A clone is any computer based on X86 architecture other than IBM, so forget
this 'true clone' jive.. all computer vendors will sell/supply OEM operating
systems.. OEM is cheaper that retail versions..

The major manufacturers offer stylish, reasonably well balanced systems..
they have extensive service networks.. they make ranges of computers to suit
performance and pocket.. the essence is that they try to provide the
complete computing solution..

Mom & Pop vendors tend to put cheap parts in cheap cases.. you get what you
pay for in this world..

You can also build your own.. it is not difficult, is no cheaper, but at
least you know what has gone into it..

Future-proofing is anathema to the world of computers.. technology can make
quantum leaps overnight, kicking even the best of today's systems firmly
into touch..

Just buy a computer that you can afford, and quit stalling..


<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Actually, after considerable digging, I've decided I may be going about
> this whole project backwards.
>
> Considering some of the staggering price differences between the
> various customizable options -- Falcon Northwest, Alienware, Velocity
> Micro, IBuyPower, Dell, etc, etc, and the monolithic jobs like Sony,
> HP, Gateway, (and the Powerspec which seems to exist in some sort of
> bizarre netherworld between a true clone and a monolith) the thought
> crosses my mind it might actually be CHEAPER to buy one of the
> monolithic machines AND an XP OEM disc (even the full boxed verson in
> addition to a monolith is cheaper than some of the configs I have run)
> and round up the rest of the hardware drivers from the net.
>
> QUESTION ... obviously there are mechanisms in the restore discs and
> the restore partitions of the monoliths to prevent them from being
> installed on another machine, but do any of them have any mechanisms to
> allow a new full copy of XP to be loaded on THEM?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ax
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Frank
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st Dec 2004

"Mike Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:exxis$(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have a feeling that you are a troll in the making..
>
> A clone is any computer based on X86 architecture other than IBM, so
> forget this 'true clone' jive.. all computer vendors will sell/supply OEM
> operating systems.. OEM is cheaper that retail versions..
>
> The major manufacturers offer stylish, reasonably well balanced systems..
> they have extensive service networks.. they make ranges of computers to
> suit performance and pocket.. the essence is that they try to provide the
> complete computing solution..
>
> Mom & Pop vendors tend to put cheap parts in cheap cases.. you get what
> you pay for in this world..
>
> You can also build your own.. it is not difficult, is no cheaper, but at
> least you know what has gone into it..
>
> Future-proofing is anathema to the world of computers.. technology can
> make quantum leaps overnight, kicking even the best of today's systems
> firmly into touch..
>
> Just buy a computer that you can afford, and quit stalling..


You are very uninformed.....


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hall
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Jan 2005

"Frank" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Mike Hall" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:exxis$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>I have a feeling that you are a troll in the making..
>>
>> A clone is any computer based on X86 architecture other than IBM, so
>> forget this 'true clone' jive.. all computer vendors will sell/supply OEM
>> operating systems.. OEM is cheaper that retail versions..
>>
>> The major manufacturers offer stylish, reasonably well balanced systems..
>> they have extensive service networks.. they make ranges of computers to
>> suit performance and pocket.. the essence is that they try to provide the
>> complete computing solution..
>>
>> Mom & Pop vendors tend to put cheap parts in cheap cases.. you get what
>> you pay for in this world..
>>
>> You can also build your own.. it is not difficult, is no cheaper, but at
>> least you know what has gone into it..
>>
>> Future-proofing is anathema to the world of computers.. technology can
>> make quantum leaps overnight, kicking even the best of today's systems
>> firmly into touch..
>>
>> Just buy a computer that you can afford, and quit stalling..

>
> You are very uninformed.....
>


Frank

I didn't say that the major manufacturer stuff was good or any better or
that their support and service network is any good or better.. I chose not
to pass judgement as it is up to the buyer to make a final choice..

Personally, I wouldn't touch major manufacturer or mom&pop stuff, preferring
to build my own.. so where am I so uninformed?..

Mike


 
Reply With Quote
 
cquirke (MVP Win9x)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd Jan 2005
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

>Considering some of the staggering price differences between the
>various customizable options -- Falcon Northwest, Alienware, Velocity
>Micro, IBuyPower, Dell, etc, etc, and the monolithic jobs like Sony,
>HP, Gateway, (and the Powerspec which seems to exist in some sort of
>bizarre netherworld between a true clone and a monolith) the thought
>crosses my mind it might actually be CHEAPER to buy one of the
>monolithic machines AND an XP OEM disc (even the full boxed verson in
>addition to a monolith is cheaper than some of the configs I have run)
>and round up the rest of the hardware drivers from the net.


You're about to make a costly purchase. If you can't be bothered to
figure out what makes some PCs cost more than others, and are buying
on price alone, then you deserve what you will get.

Paying MS for 2 licenses for one PC is a bad answer - basically, you
are saying that gouging the user is a good way to make more money.

I guess it's Darwin take the hindmost, though...



>------------------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

The rights you save may be your own
>------------------ ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

 
Reply With Quote
 
axinar@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Jan 2005

cquirke (MVP Win9x) wrote:

> You're about to make a costly purchase. If you can't be bothered to
> figure out what makes some PCs cost more than others, and are buying
> on price alone, then you deserve what you will get.
>
> Paying MS for 2 licenses for one PC is a bad answer - basically, you
> are saying that gouging the user is a good way to make more money.
>
> I guess it's Darwin take the hindmost, though...


Check this out though:

The machine in question is a Powerspec 9262 -- 3.4 GHz, 1 GB RAM, 250
GB HD, 16X DVD-ROM, 16X dual layer DVD+R 8X DVD-R, XP Pro. Sticker is
$1299 - $100 rebate = $1199 + $150 for an XP OEM disk = $1349.

Now, it's almost impossible to do an apples & apples as it looks like
Dell pretty much forces you into a 15 month subscription to either
Norton or McAfee, but, near as I can tell, the closest config that I
could come up with on Dell was on a Dimension 8400 which came out to
$1768.

$1768 - $1349 = $419 that I'm ahead even though I had to pay that
S.O.B. Gates for two licenses for the same box.

Ax

 
Reply With Quote
 
cquirke (MVP Win9x)
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Jan 2005
On 3 Jan 2005 08:12:27 -0800, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>The machine in question is a Powerspec 9262 -- 3.4 GHz, 1 GB RAM, 250
>GB HD, 16X DVD-ROM, 16X dual layer DVD+R 8X DVD-R, XP Pro. Sticker is
>$1299 - $100 rebate = $1199 + $150 for an XP OEM disk = $1349.


Motherboard chipset? Proprietary parts? Micro-ATX? PSU power
rating? Integrated SVGA with no slot for alternate?

If it's the wrong spec, the price is irrelevant.

I'd forget the lame bland stuff entirely, and find someone clued
enough to assemble the spec you want. I doubt very much whether
there'd be much price variance, assuming the spec was similar. Simply
having the same processor, RAM, HD and peripherals is not "similar".



>--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

Tech Support: The guys who follow the
'Parade of New Products' with a shovel.
>--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

 
Reply With Quote
 
axinar@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Jan 2005

cquirke (MVP Win9x) wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2005 08:12:27 -0800, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>
> >The machine in question is a Powerspec 9262 -- 3.4 GHz, 1 GB RAM,

250
> >GB HD, 16X DVD-ROM, 16X dual layer DVD+R 8X DVD-R, XP Pro. Sticker

is
> >$1299 - $100 rebate = $1199 + $150 for an XP OEM disk = $1349.

>
> Motherboard chipset? Proprietary parts? Micro-ATX? PSU power
> rating? Integrated SVGA with no slot for alternate?
>
> If it's the wrong spec, the price is irrelevant.
>
> I'd forget the lame bland stuff entirely, and find someone clued
> enough to assemble the spec you want. I doubt very much whether
> there'd be much price variance, assuming the spec was similar.

Simply
> having the same processor, RAM, HD and peripherals is not "similar".


That's just it ... near as I can tell, on the hardware side anyway,
this beast actually is a "true clone", or certainly as close as I have
seen in an "off-the-shelf" box ...

http://www.powerspec.com/systems/sys...selection=9262

Motherboard is at full ATX -- Intel D915PGN -- 4 DDR-400 RAM slots,
Intel 915P chipset.

Now, it has some sort of on-board "Realtek ALC860" on-board sound that
I haven't been able to figure out how to disable in BIOS, but I'm
guessing XP would recognize a Soundblaster Audigy or something if I
installed one.

It has a PCI Express X16 video slot that came from the factory with an
nVidia GeForce FX 5300 128MB video card which I swapped out for an ATI
X600 All-In-Wonder card almost immediately and it seems to be working
perfectly.

Nope ... looks like this box really is a clone ... only problem is that
the system restore disk has no ability to go into fdisk or do any other
customization that I have been able to see -- to say nothing of forcing
an installation of some sort of Norton trial version or something of
the sort.

So near and yet so far ...

Ax

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"save as" and "open" do not respond in MS Word prabu.ganesh@gmail.com Microsoft Word Document Management 10 15th Jun 2006 11:22 PM
respond to "go to sleep" and "wake up" events Dan Microsoft Dot NET Compact Framework 2 14th Jun 2006 07:25 AM
How can I bypass the requirement to respond "yes" to "item.sent" =?Utf-8?B?Qm9ic2ll?= Microsoft Outlook Discussion 1 22nd Jan 2006 11:32 PM
""Generic Host Process for Win32 Services"" error!!! ÀÌÇØÁÖ Windows XP General 1 12th May 2005 11:03 AM
Shared Disks shows under "Unknown group" in "MY Network Places Nevio Windows XP General 0 6th Jun 2004 11:17 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM.