Dustin wrote:

>Heres mine:
>
>http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/dnsbenchmark.jpg

Finally upgraded to Win 7?

--
It's weird... people say they're not like apes. Now how do you
explain football then? -Mitch Hedberg

G. Morgan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> Dustin wrote:
>
>>Heres mine:
>>
>>http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/dnsbenchmark.jpg
>
> Finally upgraded to Win 7?
>

Win7? You see a start button! don't ya? With a win2k style desktop. [g]
It's windows XP with the eye candy turned off.


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

G. Morgan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> Bear wrote:
>
>>
>>Damn, Cox's servers are closer than Symantec's to my location yet the
>>DNSBenchmark shows Symantec's DNS servers to be faster. In fact, it is
>>fastest of the performance of 4,849 resolvers.
>>
>>http://bearware.info/screenshots/DNSBenchmark000.png
>
>
> You don't want the ones colored brown, that means they play games
> with misspellings and sites they view as 'bad'.

He also didn't actually run the benchmark. Notice no blue bar across the
top and no grid lines.


--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

Dustin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:XnsA02FB1C05BE6AHHI2948AJD832@no:

> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:XnsA02F897A3C359bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>
>> As I was telling you throughout this discussion that there are other
>> factors at play than the speed of electricity. You were wrong.
>
> Umm, no. You're trying to twist what I told you into what you've told
> me. Won't work. You tried to tell me a server some distance away from
> a closer one would always be faster. I explained that's not true and
> why.

Liar

>
> When I mentioned electricity, You went further down the spiral and
> tried to educate me on basic electrical principles. Moron.

Liar
>
>> I was certified by the United States Air Force.
>
> And your electrical rank is? Are you journeyman, lineman, master? what
> EXACTLY? Did you keep up with it or just let it go?

Went much deeper into it, the rest is non of your business.
>
>
>> Not at all. Considering you claim yourself to be an expert, mouthed
>> off a lot here in a dinigrating manner, and were wrong...indicates
>
> Cite where I was wrong. an MID will do fine. I don't claim myself as
> an expert without being able to back it up.

Liar
>
>> expert advices is of limited value many times...depending on who it
>> is coming from. Experts always have a tendency to over rate
>> themselves and go too far....it almost becomes a religion to them and
>
> I personally find that amatuers, posers and wannabe's tend to do this.

It /is/ what you are doing...well outside your reach you go.
>
>> they want people to take their words on blind faith...especially when
>> they have other agendas involved. You were wrong here.
>
> I've *never* wanted you or anyone else to take things I've said on
> blind faith. I'm always willing to provide supporting evidence for
> anything I've said. Recently, I mentioned mbam was a memory hog,
> someone disagreed. I provided steps anybody can take to duplicate the
> results and see for themselves that mbam chews ram. So you see,
> asshole, I don't want you to take my word for it, I want you to see it
> with your own eyes and KNOW I WAS RIGHT. That, is far far more
> important to me.

Liar. You were wrong in this thread and you know it. Now you are
crawfishing. I figured you would try to do so, but the thread is there.
>
> I'll give you another one. Sometime ago, an individual tried to load
> winxp with SP1 using a known blacklisted key. I told them they'd be
> specifically told by the service pack the key isn't valid and won't
> install. They didn't believe me, so they did the test as was
> suggested. Guess what? It did EXACTLY what I said it would, He was
> kind enough to post with those findings, dining on crow in the
> process.

WTF are you talking about all this **** for.
>
> Another individual by the name of Relic claimed windows XP doesn't
> have backup registries you could use in a pinch; He was suggesting the
> original known good ones to be replaced and reinstall. For a known
> registry corruption error. I suggested replacing hive files from the
> _restore folder would get the machine back up and going, as it was
> just a corrupted registry file. This went on for days, until a 3rd
> party did the test and confirmed! my results.

WTF are you talking aobut all this **** for.
>
> I'll 0wn you just like I did them, anytime you wanna challenge me.

Son, you don't stand a chance.
>
>>> I don't think Symantec would be as willing as you to misstate facts.
>>>
>> LOL...too egotistical to admit defeat eh.
>
> Egotistical? HAHAHA. Right, dude, I posted my dns benchmark. It
> doesn't agree with your claims. Symantec isn't even in the top 5.
>
>
You performed a faulty test. I ran the entire custom list process and
posted the results. You didn't. You accused me of falsifying it. You are
a liar, a **** and a coward.

I'm done with such as you.


--
Bear
http://bearware.info
The real Bear's header path is:
news.sunsite.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-
mail

Dustin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:XnsA02FBEFFDDC81HHI2948AJD832@no:

> G. Morgan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> Bear wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Damn, Cox's servers are closer than Symantec's to my location yet the
>>>DNSBenchmark shows Symantec's DNS servers to be faster. In fact, it
>>>is fastest of the performance of 4,849 resolvers.
>>>
>>>http://bearware.info/screenshots/DNSBenchmark000.png
>>
>>
>> You don't want the ones colored brown, that means they play games
>> with misspellings and sites they view as 'bad'.
>
> He also didn't actually run the benchmark. Notice no blue bar across
> the top and no grid lines.
>
>

That is an image of the custom list results which you didn't do and have
no clue, talking about results which you have no knowledge of as you
didn't perform the process, and that is a direct image from the results.
I can call you out on that too...and you would be proven wrong on that
one also. Dustin...you lost and don't have the balls to admit it.

See ya round.

--
Bear
http://bearware.info
The real Bear's header path is:
news.sunsite.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-
mail

Dustin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:XnsA02FB25AF5894HHI2948AJD832@no:

> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:XnsA02F89DA34FB2bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>
>> Dustin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> news:XnsA02F8311ADAA0HHI2948AJD832@no:
>>
>>> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>> news:XnsA02F63254151Dbearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>>>
>>>> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>>> news:XnsA02C4560CC195bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>>>>
>>>>> Norton ConnectSafe
>>>>
>>>> Damn, Cox's servers are closer than Symantec's to my location yet
>>>> the DNSBenchmark shows Symantec's DNS servers to be faster. In
>>>> fact, it is fastest of the performance of 4,849 resolvers.
>>>>
>>>> http://bearware.info/screenshots/DNSBenchmark000.png
>>>
>>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/dnsbenchmark.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Must be something going on other than the speed of electricity.
>>>
>>> As already explained.
>>
>> You did not ... I did. You were hung up on how close a server was,
>> and I explained to you that other factors were at play. You only
>> spouted that out after I proved you wrong and only since today.
>> Yesterday was a different story Mr. Crawfish.
>
> Nice try.. I keep MID's tho.
>
> Heres what you actually said...
> Message-ID: <XnsA02F63254151Dbearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104>
>
> This is what I said
> Message-ID: <XnsA02F801CB2C1EHHI2948AJD832@no>
> Packet switching, fiber and routing all play a part. As well as server
> load. IE: If the Cox DNS server is busy, symantec might outrun it's
> replies from YOUR physical location. That does NOT mean it'll be the
> same for everyone else using Cox.
>
> I stand by what I said. Symantec is far slower for my systems, as is
> proven in the dnsbenchmark jpg I already posted. Your claims of
> symantec always being faster than your ISP (I don't even use Cox, but
> Cox is faster on my benchmark) were wrong for a variety of reasons.
> Your pathetic attempts to talk down or otherwise try and belittle me
> do you no good. You're an idiot and we all know it.
>
>
>

Nice try, but you can easily prove yourself wrong by running the custom
list process which you admitted you haven't done and as a result are
talking outta your ass.

You lost. Simple as that. You are a ****, a liar and a coward.

Best to move on Dustin...your in over your head. I'm moving on.

--
Bear
http://bearware.info
The real Bear's header path is:
news.sunsite.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-
mail

Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:XnsA02FB6F012D26bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:

> Went much deeper into it, the rest is non of your business.

Nice ****ing try. Master electrician is the deepest rank. A master
electrician can work on anything from residential,commercial,industrial
AND marine. I've asked as clearly as I can. You obviously aren't
interested in discussion where you'd have to present facts that I or
anyone else might already know or could look up. I don't blame you in
this case for not answering my questions. You lied and I've caught you.

I don't care that you've been trained by the air force. Unless you
continued the field, you are not a master electrician. As you are not a
master electrician, theres NO ****ING WAY you're anything above it. You
probably left with equ rank to a journeymans license and never pursued
it further. It's not like you'd have time wiring things when flying
planes anyhow.

>>> Not at all. Considering you claim yourself to be an expert, mouthed
>>> off a lot here in a dinigrating manner, and were wrong...indicates
>>
>> Cite where I was wrong. an MID will do fine. I don't claim myself as
>> an expert without being able to back it up.
>
> Liar

So you have an MID then? Post it.

> It /is/ what you are doing...well outside your reach you go.

You've yet to present anything for discussion that's well outside my
reach. Seriously. I've written hacking tools and real viruses for
christs sake. Just what do you think you can really teach me, you non
coding little shitstain?

>> I've *never* wanted you or anyone else to take things I've said on
>> blind faith. I'm always willing to provide supporting evidence for
>> anything I've said. Recently, I mentioned mbam was a memory hog,
>> someone disagreed. I provided steps anybody can take to duplicate
>> the results and see for themselves that mbam chews ram. So you see,
>> asshole, I don't want you to take my word for it, I want you to see
>> it with your own eyes and KNOW I WAS RIGHT. That, is far far more
>> important to me.
>
> Liar. You were wrong in this thread and you know it. Now you are
> crawfishing. I figured you would try to do so, but the thread is
> there.

I think you should seriously consider a dictionary. If cost is a
concern, many free ones online do exist.

>>
>> I'll give you another one. Sometime ago, an individual tried to load
>> winxp with SP1 using a known blacklisted key. I told them they'd be
>> specifically told by the service pack the key isn't valid and won't
>> install. They didn't believe me, so they did the test as was
>> suggested. Guess what? It did EXACTLY what I said it would, He was
>> kind enough to post with those findings, dining on crow in the
>> process.
>
> WTF are you talking about all this **** for.

It's not ****. It's evidence for my claims. I told you, I backup what I
say. I love to backup what I say. I'm the kind of guy who will tell you
at 4pm on tuesday in the middle of the mall, I'm going to walk upto you
and break your nose. Rest assured, at 4pm on tuesday in the middle of
the mall with a crowd of people watching, I'd walk upto you and break
your nose. I don't hide it, I WANT YOU TO KNOW I DID IT. Same thing with
computers, Bear.

I like people to underestimate me and my actions. So that when I make
good on the promise, their totally surprised and horrified at the same
time. It's a ****ing rush dude.

>> Another individual by the name of Relic claimed windows XP doesn't
>> have backup registries you could use in a pinch; He was suggesting
>> the original known good ones to be replaced and reinstall. For a
>> known registry corruption error. I suggested replacing hive files
>> from the _restore folder would get the machine back up and going, as
>> it was just a corrupted registry file. This went on for days, until
>> a 3rd party did the test and confirmed! my results.
>
> WTF are you talking aobut all this **** for.

See above.

>> I'll 0wn you just like I did them, anytime you wanna challenge me.
>
> Son, you don't stand a chance.

I already 0wned you Bear the first time I wrote a working program. The
rest is just gravy.

> You performed a faulty test. I ran the entire custom list process and
> posted the results. You didn't. You accused me of falsifying it. You
> are a liar, a **** and a coward.

No blue bar, no graph. No test ran. You know the custom list process
finds DNS servers intentionally which would be fastest for you, FOR YOU,
not necessarily for me or anybody else. Even If I do a custom list,
it'll find servers faster for ME, they still won't match your findings.
It's basic internet 101 for the answer as to why. Hell, it's the same
answer as to why this thread is stupid in my opinion. Server speed times
vary for a variety of reasons. You're outlandish claim of symantec
whooping ass just doesn't jive with reality.





--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by, and
the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:XnsA02FB81259733bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:

> Dustin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:XnsA02FB25AF5894HHI2948AJD832@no:
>
>> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> news:XnsA02F89DA34FB2bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>>
>>> Dustin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>> news:XnsA02F8311ADAA0HHI2948AJD832@no:
>>>
>>>> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>>> news:XnsA02F63254151Dbearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>>>>
>>>>> Bear <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>>>>> news:XnsA02C4560CC195bearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Norton ConnectSafe
>>>>>
>>>>> Damn, Cox's servers are closer than Symantec's to my location yet
>>>>> the DNSBenchmark shows Symantec's DNS servers to be faster. In
>>>>> fact, it is fastest of the performance of 4,849 resolvers.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bearware.info/screenshots/DNSBenchmark000.png
>>>>
>>>> http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/dnsbenchmark.jpg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Must be something going on other than the speed of electricity.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As already explained.
>>>
>>> You did not ... I did. You were hung up on how close a server was,
>>> and I explained to you that other factors were at play. You only
>>> spouted that out after I proved you wrong and only since today.
>>> Yesterday was a different story Mr. Crawfish.
>>
>> Nice try.. I keep MID's tho.
>>
>> Heres what you actually said...
>> Message-ID: <XnsA02F63254151Dbearbottoms1gmail.AC@130.225.254.104>
>>
>> This is what I said
>> Message-ID: <XnsA02F801CB2C1EHHI2948AJD832@no>
>> Packet switching, fiber and routing all play a part. As well as
>> server load. IE: If the Cox DNS server is busy, symantec might
>> outrun it's replies from YOUR physical location. That does NOT mean
>> it'll be the same for everyone else using Cox.
>>
>> I stand by what I said. Symantec is far slower for my systems, as is
>> proven in the dnsbenchmark jpg I already posted. Your claims of
>> symantec always being faster than your ISP (I don't even use Cox,
>> but Cox is faster on my benchmark) were wrong for a variety of
>> reasons. Your pathetic attempts to talk down or otherwise try and
>> belittle me do you no good. You're an idiot and we all know it.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Nice try, but you can easily prove yourself wrong by running the
> custom list process which you admitted you haven't done and as a
> result are talking outta your ass.

Bear.. The custom list process is designed to find faster DNS servers
based on my location. The results will vary from yours and poohs and
others who choose to run it. Same as the default test. Nothing flawed
using the default test. It didn't go out of it's way to find faster
servers for me, which would skew the results.

> You lost. Simple as that. You are a ****, a liar and a coward.

I've lost nothing but a little time here and there responding to your
stupid comments. And really, they're stupid.

I don't find the word **** to be offensive Bear. I find your remarks
concerning liar and coward a bit childish and unwarranted. I freely post
with my real name. I've never worked as a snitch for the CIA flying
illegal narcotics into or out of the country, Billy.

I do find it funny that someone with your past has the audacity to call
me a coward. I can't think of many things worse than a lowlife snitching
scumbag. Like, you.

If you want me to cite proof of that claim, You just ask. I'd be happy
to. Nah **** it, I'm going to drop some urls for others to ponder right
now. I'll show you "****". Boy.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO...ENA/welch.html
http://prorev.com/bottoms.htm



> Best to move on Dustin...your in over your head. I'm moving on.

I've yet to be in over my head on any discussion with you.



--
Character is doing the right thing when nobody's looking. There are too
many people who think that the only thing that's right is to get by,
and the only thing that's wrong is to get caught. - J.C. Watts

Dustin wrote:

>G. Morgan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> Dustin wrote:
>>
>>>Heres mine:
>>>
>>>http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/dnsbenchmark.jpg
>>
>> Finally upgraded to Win 7?
>>
>
>Win7? You see a start button! don't ya? With a win2k style desktop. [g]
>It's windows XP with the eye candy turned off.

I noticed the 'show desktop' icon in the LhS of the tray after I
posted. I used to have Win 7 setup with the 'classic' look, I
thought that's what you had going on!

--
I wanted to buy a candle holder, but the store didn't have one.
So I got a cake. -Mitch Hedberg

Dustin wrote:

>G. Morgan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> Bear wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Damn, Cox's servers are closer than Symantec's to my location yet the
>>>DNSBenchmark shows Symantec's DNS servers to be faster. In fact, it is
>>>fastest of the performance of 4,849 resolvers.
>>>
>>>http://bearware.info/screenshots/DNSBenchmark000.png
>>
>>
>> You don't want the ones colored brown, that means they play games
>> with misspellings and sites they view as 'bad'.
>
>He also didn't actually run the benchmark. Notice no blue bar across the
>top and no grid lines.

Oh, yeah. He just did the first step.

--
Rice is great if you're really hungry and want to eat two
thousand of something. -Mitch Hedberg