PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

DNS cache settings, default & otherwise

 
 
Fryed
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Sep 2008
Issue here is as follows: I've been running a performance/security check-up
tool on my PC (XP Home) and it suggests optimizing my DNS cache settings.
Particularly, it suggests changing both the existing times for positive
responses (86400 seconds by default) and negative responses (300 seconds).
Accordingly, I created the registry keys MaxCacheTtl and MaxNegativeCacheTtl
in the LocalMachine registry branch, setting both times different than the
defaults. Still, the PC check-up tool indicates the same values of 86400 and
300 (upon restarting of course). Any help is welcome!

Furthermore, if the DNS cache has default times, why wouldn't MaxCacheTtl
and MaxNegativeCacheTtl exist by default?

Thanks
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
DrTeeth
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Sep 2008
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:15:00 -0700, just as I was about to take a
herb, Fryed <(E-Mail Removed)> disturbed my reverie and
wrote:

>Furthermore, if the DNS cache has default times, why wouldn't MaxCacheTtl
>and MaxNegativeCacheTtl exist by default?


If a value exists by default, it does not have to be listed. A listing
is used either to modify the default or to place it there for future
reference.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Fryed
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Oct 2008
Your reply answered my second question and I thank you. Any comment on the
first one? My PC checkup tool still tells me the positive and negative ttl's
are the defaults, even after creating the appropriate DWORD values and
changing the times (and restarting of course). Is there an extra step I've
left out?

"DrTeeth" wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:15:00 -0700, just as I was about to take a
> herb, Fryed <(E-Mail Removed)> disturbed my reverie and
> wrote:
>
> >Furthermore, if the DNS cache has default times, why wouldn't MaxCacheTtl
> >and MaxNegativeCacheTtl exist by default?

>
> If a value exists by default, it does not have to be listed. A listing
> is used either to modify the default or to place it there for future
> reference.
> --
>
> Cheers,
>
> DrT
>
> ** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
> ** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
> ** out of someone who richly deserves it.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IE 6 Cache settings =?Utf-8?B?dWx0cmEgYWs=?= Windows XP Internet Explorer 2 17th Feb 2006 03:14 AM
DNS cache settings in XP Pro Alex Coleman Windows XP General 1 22nd Oct 2005 03:16 PM
DNS cache settings in XP Pro Alex Coleman Microsoft Windows 2000 Networking 1 22nd Oct 2005 03:16 PM
Default Object Settings - Tables - Fixing Default Settings =?Utf-8?B?Um9iZXJ0IFQu?= Microsoft Powerpoint 4 2nd May 2005 04:13 PM
XP SP2 and cache settings =?Utf-8?B?QW5pbmU=?= Windows XP General 2 13th Sep 2004 02:15 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 PM.