PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

DNS Best practices: Where to piont secondary DC's?

 
 
KW
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Jul 2006
I have three domain controllers in my environment and I want to ensure they
are configured for best practices. Here is a high level layout of my
scenerio:

2000 ADS, single forest, no child domains. All DC's have DNS installed.

DC01.mydomain.com
Pri DNS = DC01
Sec DNS = nothing

DC02.mydomain.com
Pri DNS = DC02
Sec DNS = DC01

DC03.mydomain.com
Pri DNS = DC03
Sec DNS = DC01

I assumed that all DC's were supposed to point to themselves for DNS until I
read an MS article ID 275278. This expresses a few concerns about DNS
servers islanding themselves if pointed to themselves. I am thinking about
configuring DC02 and DC03 to point to DC01 and set their alternates to be
DC03 and DC02. My only hesitation was at the bottom of the article it says
it applies to Windows 2000 SP1 and SP2.

Obviously more complex domains require more complex configurations, but I
want to ensure this is still best practice in its simplest form.

Thanks for reading
Kevin


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Kurt
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Jul 2006
Ya, I've found that they should all point to another as their preferred and
to themselves as the alternate. Most of the time it works fine either way,
but there are circumstances where something that requires DNS resolution
runs before the local DNS service has started up. It can lead to long
startups, or scripts that can't be located, etc.

....kurt

"KW" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have three domain controllers in my environment and I want to ensure they
>are configured for best practices. Here is a high level layout of my
>scenerio:
>
> 2000 ADS, single forest, no child domains. All DC's have DNS installed.
>
> DC01.mydomain.com
> Pri DNS = DC01
> Sec DNS = nothing
>
> DC02.mydomain.com
> Pri DNS = DC02
> Sec DNS = DC01
>
> DC03.mydomain.com
> Pri DNS = DC03
> Sec DNS = DC01
>
> I assumed that all DC's were supposed to point to themselves for DNS until
> I read an MS article ID 275278. This expresses a few concerns about DNS
> servers islanding themselves if pointed to themselves. I am thinking
> about configuring DC02 and DC03 to point to DC01 and set their alternates
> to be DC03 and DC02. My only hesitation was at the bottom of the article
> it says it applies to Windows 2000 SP1 and SP2.
>
> Obviously more complex domains require more complex configurations, but I
> want to ensure this is still best practice in its simplest form.
>
> Thanks for reading
> Kevin
>



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.Logging.LoggingExceptionHandler,Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.Logging,Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null from configuration couldnot be created. golla.venkatesulu@gmail.com Microsoft Dot NET Framework 0 7th Jan 2008 02:40 PM
when my C# service impersonates a secondary account does the secondary account need any special permissions? what are they? Daniel Microsoft Dot NET Framework 3 22nd Aug 2006 08:57 PM
when my C# service impersonates a secondary account does the secondary account need any special permissions? what are they? Daniel Microsoft Dot NET 0 22nd Aug 2006 06:36 PM
Deleting a restore piont Helge Haensel Windows XP General 3 21st Sep 2004 10:26 AM
showing power piont janetteallan@hotmail.com Microsoft Powerpoint 4 20th Apr 2004 07:18 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.