Your doubts are well founded. If these .oft files are simply boilerplate messages, then they should work fine if dropped into a network share.
If, however, they are Outlook custom message forms designed with custom properties, they will not work from a file share. Assuming you have OL2003 SP2 (which is what you need to be up-to-date on security issues), they will work only when used internally and published to the Organizational Forms library, which is a special system folder on the Exchange server, or to each individual user's Personal Forms library.
So, you might want to give us a little more detail about the purpose and nature of these .oft files.
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm
and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
"Amedee Van Gasse" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Dear lazyweb,
>
> We are preparing a migration from Lotus Notes to Exchange 2003 +
> Outlook 2003 (SP unknown).
> I have a question about the distribution of Outlook templates (.oft
> files).
>
> Currently we already provide Word, Excel and Powerpoint templates
> (.dot/.xlt/.pot) on a network share, and when the Office installation
> is pushed to a client pc, a registry key is added that changes the
> file location of workgroup templates. (One of the many mysteries of
> Office: why can you only configure this in Word, and why does this
> setting also apply to Excel and Powerpoint? What if Word isn't
> installed?)
>
> One opinion I heard about distributing .oft files, is that we can
> simply drop them in the same network share and Outlook will
> automagically find them. I personally doubt this.
> But documentation I found on the web suggests something else. I read
> an article on microsoft.com about "publishing to organisational
> folders" and it isn't clear to me if they mean filesystem folders or
> Exchange public folders. I have also found conflicting documentation,
> and to make matters worse, some things seem to depend on service pack
> level.
>
> So now I am a bit confused. Dear lazyweb, what is the simplest way to
> distribute outlook templates in an Exchange+Outlook 2003 environment,
> with the least amount of administrative overhead, easy deployable at
> first installation, and user friendly? I don't want them to browse to
> the network share, Outlook should just present the correct template
> folder to the user.
>
>
> --
> Amedee Van Gasse
> SE Office
>